From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ning Cai <ncai@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:43:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116193722.50360-1-ahalaney@redhat.com>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:37:23 -0600 Andrew Halaney wrote:
> I've been working on a newer Qualcomm platform (sa8540p-ride) which has
> a variant of dwmac5 in it. This patch is something Ning stumbled on when
> adding some support for it downstream, and has been in my queue as I try
> and get some support ready for review on list upstream.
>
> Since it isn't really related to the particular hardware I decided to
> pop it on list now. Please let me know if instead of enabling by default
> (which the original implementation did and is why I went that route) a
> message like "Safety features detected but not enabled in software" is
> preferred and platforms are skipped unless they opt-in for enablement.
Could you repost and CC Wong Vee Khee, and maybe some other Intel folks
who have been touching stmmac recently? They are probably the best to
comment / review.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ning Cai <ncai@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:43:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116193722.50360-1-ahalaney@redhat.com>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:37:23 -0600 Andrew Halaney wrote:
> I've been working on a newer Qualcomm platform (sa8540p-ride) which has
> a variant of dwmac5 in it. This patch is something Ning stumbled on when
> adding some support for it downstream, and has been in my queue as I try
> and get some support ready for review on list upstream.
>
> Since it isn't really related to the particular hardware I decided to
> pop it on list now. Please let me know if instead of enabling by default
> (which the original implementation did and is why I went that route) a
> message like "Safety features detected but not enabled in software" is
> preferred and platforms are skipped unless they opt-in for enablement.
Could you repost and CC Wong Vee Khee, and maybe some other Intel folks
who have been touching stmmac recently? They are probably the best to
comment / review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 19:37 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default Andrew Halaney
2023-01-16 19:37 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-01-18 3:43 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-18 3:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-18 15:30 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-01-18 15:30 ` Andrew Halaney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ncai@quicinc.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.