From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Yajun Wu <yajunw@nvidia.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>, <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vhost-user: Remove the nested event loop to unbreak the DPDK use case
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230123092119.074e456b@bahia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119172424.478268-1-groug@kaod.org>
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:24:22 +0100
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> The nested event loop was introduced in QEMU 6.0 to allow servicing
> of requests coming from the slave channel while waiting for an ack
> from the back-end on the master socket. It turns out this is fragile
> and breaks if the servicing of the slave channel causes a new message
> to be sent on the master socket. This is exactly what happens when
> using DPDK as reported in [0].
>
> The only identified user for the nested loop is DAX enablement that
> isn't upstream yet. Just drop the code for now. Some more clever
> solution should be designed when the need to service concurrent
> requests from both channels arises again.
>
> Greg Kurz (2):
> Revert "vhost-user: Monitor slave channel in vhost_user_read()"
> Revert "vhost-user: Introduce nested event loop in vhost_user_read()"
>
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 100 ++++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>
Hi Michael,
Can you please merge this series as you kindly proposed in [0] ?
This will help to fix [1] which is currently blocking downstream
testing.
Cheers,
--
Greg
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230118060102-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org/
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155173
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 17:24 [PATCH 0/2] vhost-user: Remove the nested event loop to unbreak the DPDK use case Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "vhost-user: Monitor slave channel in vhost_user_read()" Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 18:39 ` Greg Kurz
2023-01-19 21:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-20 15:03 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "vhost-user: Introduce nested event loop " Greg Kurz
2023-01-20 15:13 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-23 8:21 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230123092119.074e456b@bahia \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=yajunw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.