From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: io: new binding for IO accessible NVMEM devices
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:32:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130203251.GA3290808-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127175831.26753-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
>
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be accessed using
> IO mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
What do we call nvmem using ISA/PCI IO space? That was my first thought
seeing "IO". Probably unlikely, but still. "MMIO" instead?
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..67e0aae9cd94
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/io.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: IO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> + This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by simply
> + mapping a predefined IO address.
> +
> + It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> + handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> + proper layout.
As the accesses are memory-mapped, the child nodes should also have
memory-mapped addresses. IOW, you need 'ranges', '#address-cells',
'#size-cells'.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: io-nvmem
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
The first addition here will be access size restrictions. Perhaps add
that now (reg-io-width).
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + nvmem@10000 {
> + compatible = "io-nvmem";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: io: new binding for IO accessible NVMEM devices
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:32:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130203251.GA3290808-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127175831.26753-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
>
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be accessed using
> IO mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
What do we call nvmem using ISA/PCI IO space? That was my first thought
seeing "IO". Probably unlikely, but still. "MMIO" instead?
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..67e0aae9cd94
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/io.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: IO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> + This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by simply
> + mapping a predefined IO address.
> +
> + It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> + handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> + proper layout.
As the accesses are memory-mapped, the child nodes should also have
memory-mapped addresses. IOW, you need 'ranges', '#address-cells',
'#size-cells'.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: io-nvmem
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
The first addition here will be access size restrictions. Perhaps add
that now (reg-io-width).
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + nvmem@10000 {
> + compatible = "io-nvmem";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: io: new binding for IO accessible NVMEM devices
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:32:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130203251.GA3290808-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127175831.26753-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
>
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be accessed using
> IO mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
What do we call nvmem using ISA/PCI IO space? That was my first thought
seeing "IO". Probably unlikely, but still. "MMIO" instead?
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..67e0aae9cd94
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/io.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/io.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: IO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> + This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by simply
> + mapping a predefined IO address.
> +
> + It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> + handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> + proper layout.
As the accesses are memory-mapped, the child nodes should also have
memory-mapped addresses. IOW, you need 'ranges', '#address-cells',
'#size-cells'.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: io-nvmem
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
The first addition here will be access size restrictions. Perhaps add
that now (reg-io-width).
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + nvmem@10000 {
> + compatible = "io-nvmem";
> + reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 17:58 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: io: new binding for IO accessible NVMEM devices Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-27 17:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-27 17:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-27 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: add generic driver for devices with I/O based access Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-27 17:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-27 17:58 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-01-30 20:56 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-30 20:56 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-30 20:56 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-30 20:32 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-01-30 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: io: new binding for IO accessible NVMEM devices Rob Herring
2023-01-30 20:32 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230130203251.GA3290808-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.