From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
Cc: yong.wu@mediatek.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: iommu: memory: Use unmanaged iommu domain for the APU
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:50:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130225032.GA3667757-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130102722.133271-4-abailon@baylibre.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:27:22AM +0100, Alexandre Bailon wrote:
> This updates the iommu id to use unmanaged iommu domain for the APU.
> This is required by remoteproc to use the iommu.
Explain how a mixture of DTs with or without this value changed would
work with kernels with or without support for unmanaged domains? Looks
like a compatibility problem to me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> index 56d5a5dd519e7..86d82a8f6017d 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
> #define M4U_PORT_MDP_WROT0 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 7)
> #define M4U_PORT_MDP_RDMA1 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 8)
> #define M4U_PORT_DISP_FAKE0 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 9)
> -#define M4U_PORT_APU_READ MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 10)
> -#define M4U_PORT_APU_WRITE MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 11)
> +#define M4U_PORT_APU_READ MTK_M4U_UNMANAGED_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 10)
> +#define M4U_PORT_APU_WRITE MTK_M4U_UNMANAGED_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 11)
>
> /* larb1 */
> #define M4U_PORT_VENC_RCPU MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB1_ID, 0)
> --
> 2.38.2
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
Cc: yong.wu@mediatek.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: iommu: memory: Use unmanaged iommu domain for the APU
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:50:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130225032.GA3667757-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130102722.133271-4-abailon@baylibre.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:27:22AM +0100, Alexandre Bailon wrote:
> This updates the iommu id to use unmanaged iommu domain for the APU.
> This is required by remoteproc to use the iommu.
Explain how a mixture of DTs with or without this value changed would
work with kernels with or without support for unmanaged domains? Looks
like a compatibility problem to me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> index 56d5a5dd519e7..86d82a8f6017d 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/memory/mediatek,mt8365-larb-port.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
> #define M4U_PORT_MDP_WROT0 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 7)
> #define M4U_PORT_MDP_RDMA1 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 8)
> #define M4U_PORT_DISP_FAKE0 MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 9)
> -#define M4U_PORT_APU_READ MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 10)
> -#define M4U_PORT_APU_WRITE MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 11)
> +#define M4U_PORT_APU_READ MTK_M4U_UNMANAGED_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 10)
> +#define M4U_PORT_APU_WRITE MTK_M4U_UNMANAGED_ID(M4U_LARB0_ID, 11)
>
> /* larb1 */
> #define M4U_PORT_VENC_RCPU MTK_M4U_ID(M4U_LARB1_ID, 0)
> --
> 2.38.2
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 10:27 [PATCH 0/3] Add support of unmanaged domain to mediatek IOMMU Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 10:27 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add support of unmanaged iommu domain Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 10:27 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 11:57 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 11:57 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 11:58 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 11:58 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu: " Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 10:27 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-31 13:08 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-31 13:08 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-31 14:15 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-31 14:15 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-31 15:31 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-31 15:31 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-02-14 5:48 ` Yong Wu (吴勇)
2023-02-14 5:48 ` Yong Wu (吴勇)
2023-09-14 8:07 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-09-14 8:07 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-09-14 14:19 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-14 14:19 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: iommu: memory: Use unmanaged iommu domain for the APU Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 10:27 ` Alexandre Bailon
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Alexandre Mergnat
2023-01-30 22:50 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-01-30 22:50 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230130225032.GA3667757-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=abailon@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.