All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 67/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:25:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230131092504.2880505-68-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131092504.2880505-1-maz@kernel.org>

Due to the way ARMv8.4-NV suppresses traps when accessing EL2
system registers, we can't track when the guest changes its
HCR_EL2.TGE setting. This means we always trap EL1 TLBIs,
even if they don't affect any guest.

This obviously has a huge impact on performance, as we handle
TLBI traps as a normal exit, and a normal VHE host issues
thousands of TLBIs when booting (and quite a few when running
userspace).

A cheap way to reduce the overhead is to handle the limited
case of {E2H,TGE}=={1,1} as a guest fixup, as we already have
the right mmu configuration in place. Just execute the decoded
instruction right away and return to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c    |  6 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 25 ++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 238c6613cf47..a3555b90d9e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -168,6 +168,47 @@ void deactivate_traps_vhe_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	__deactivate_traps_common(vcpu);
 }
 
+static bool kvm_hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+{
+	u32 instr;
+	u64 val;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ideally, we would never trap on EL1 TLB invalidations when the
+	 * guest's HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} == {1,1}. But "thanks" to ARMv8.4, we
+	 * don't trap writes to HCR_EL2, meaning that we can't track
+	 * changes to the virtual TGE bit. So we leave HCR_EL2.TTLB set on
+	 * the host. Oopsie...
+	 *
+	 * In order to speed-up EL1 TLBIs from the vEL2 guest when TGE is
+	 * set, try and handle these invalidation as quickly as possible,
+	 * without fully exiting (unless this needs forwarding).
+	 */
+	if (!vcpu_has_nv2(vcpu) ||
+	    !vcpu_is_el2(vcpu) ||
+	    (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE))
+		return false;
+
+	instr = esr_sys64_to_sysreg(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
+	if (sys_reg_Op0(instr) != TLBI_Op0 ||
+	    sys_reg_Op1(instr) != TLBI_Op1_EL1)
+		return false;
+
+	val = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu));
+	__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(NULL, val, instr);
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+{
+	if (kvm_hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(vcpu, exit_code))
+		return true;
+
+	return kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg(vcpu, exit_code);
+}
+
 static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
@@ -216,7 +257,7 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 static const exit_handler_fn hyp_exit_handlers[] = {
 	[0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]		= NULL,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32]		= kvm_hyp_handle_cp15_32,
-	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg_vhe,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_SVE]		= kvm_hyp_handle_fpsimd,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD]		= kvm_hyp_handle_fpsimd,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW]		= kvm_hyp_handle_iabt_low,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
index c4389db4cc22..beb162468c0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ void __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 val, u64 sys_encoding)
 	dsb(ishst);
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
+	if (mmu)
+		__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	/*
 	 * Execute the same instruction as the guest hypervisor did,
@@ -240,5 +241,6 @@ void __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 val, u64 sys_encoding)
 	dsb(ish);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	if (mmu)
+		__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1a1ae7ff218e..924afc40ab8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -3110,6 +3110,8 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u32 sys_encoding = sys_insn(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+	u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
 
 	if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && forward_traps(vcpu, HCR_TTLB))
 		return false;
@@ -3131,24 +3133,13 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 
 	mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
 
-	if ((__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) {
-		u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
-
-		mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
-		if (mmu)
-			__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
+	mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
+	if (mmu)
+		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
 
-		mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
-		if (mmu)
-			__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * ARMv8.4-NV allows the guest to change TGE behind
-		 * our back, so we always trap EL1 TLBIs from vEL2...
-		 */
-		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
-	}
+	mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
+	if (mmu)
+		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
 
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 67/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:25:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230131092504.2880505-68-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131092504.2880505-1-maz@kernel.org>

Due to the way ARMv8.4-NV suppresses traps when accessing EL2
system registers, we can't track when the guest changes its
HCR_EL2.TGE setting. This means we always trap EL1 TLBIs,
even if they don't affect any guest.

This obviously has a huge impact on performance, as we handle
TLBI traps as a normal exit, and a normal VHE host issues
thousands of TLBIs when booting (and quite a few when running
userspace).

A cheap way to reduce the overhead is to handle the limited
case of {E2H,TGE}=={1,1} as a guest fixup, as we already have
the right mmu configuration in place. Just execute the decoded
instruction right away and return to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c    |  6 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 25 ++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 238c6613cf47..a3555b90d9e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -168,6 +168,47 @@ void deactivate_traps_vhe_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	__deactivate_traps_common(vcpu);
 }
 
+static bool kvm_hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+{
+	u32 instr;
+	u64 val;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ideally, we would never trap on EL1 TLB invalidations when the
+	 * guest's HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} == {1,1}. But "thanks" to ARMv8.4, we
+	 * don't trap writes to HCR_EL2, meaning that we can't track
+	 * changes to the virtual TGE bit. So we leave HCR_EL2.TTLB set on
+	 * the host. Oopsie...
+	 *
+	 * In order to speed-up EL1 TLBIs from the vEL2 guest when TGE is
+	 * set, try and handle these invalidation as quickly as possible,
+	 * without fully exiting (unless this needs forwarding).
+	 */
+	if (!vcpu_has_nv2(vcpu) ||
+	    !vcpu_is_el2(vcpu) ||
+	    (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE))
+		return false;
+
+	instr = esr_sys64_to_sysreg(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
+	if (sys_reg_Op0(instr) != TLBI_Op0 ||
+	    sys_reg_Op1(instr) != TLBI_Op1_EL1)
+		return false;
+
+	val = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu));
+	__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(NULL, val, instr);
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+{
+	if (kvm_hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(vcpu, exit_code))
+		return true;
+
+	return kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg(vcpu, exit_code);
+}
+
 static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
@@ -216,7 +257,7 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 static const exit_handler_fn hyp_exit_handlers[] = {
 	[0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]		= NULL,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32]		= kvm_hyp_handle_cp15_32,
-	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg_vhe,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_SVE]		= kvm_hyp_handle_fpsimd,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD]		= kvm_hyp_handle_fpsimd,
 	[ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW]		= kvm_hyp_handle_iabt_low,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
index c4389db4cc22..beb162468c0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ void __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 val, u64 sys_encoding)
 	dsb(ishst);
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
+	if (mmu)
+		__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	/*
 	 * Execute the same instruction as the guest hypervisor did,
@@ -240,5 +241,6 @@ void __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 val, u64 sys_encoding)
 	dsb(ish);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	if (mmu)
+		__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1a1ae7ff218e..924afc40ab8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -3110,6 +3110,8 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u32 sys_encoding = sys_insn(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+	u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
 
 	if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && forward_traps(vcpu, HCR_TTLB))
 		return false;
@@ -3131,24 +3133,13 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 
 	mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
 
-	if ((__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) {
-		u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
-		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
-
-		mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
-		if (mmu)
-			__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
+	mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
+	if (mmu)
+		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
 
-		mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
-		if (mmu)
-			__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * ARMv8.4-NV allows the guest to change TGE behind
-		 * our back, so we always trap EL1 TLBIs from vEL2...
-		 */
-		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
-	}
+	mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
+	if (mmu)
+		__kvm_tlb_el1_instr(mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
 
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-31  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 170+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-31  9:23 [PATCH v8 00/69] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23 ` [PATCH v8 01/69] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 12:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-01-31 12:03     ` Catalin Marinas
2023-01-31 13:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 13:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 13:47   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-01-31 13:47     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-01-31 14:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 14:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 17:34       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-01-31 17:34         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-01-31 20:04         ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 20:04           ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 21:26           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 21:26             ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:01             ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:01               ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 20:44         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 20:44           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23 ` [PATCH v8 02/69] KVM: arm64: Use the S2 MMU context to iterate over S2 table Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23 ` [PATCH v8 03/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce nested virtualization VCPU feature Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23 ` [PATCH v8 04/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VCPU to EL2 registers if VCPU nested virt is set Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 05/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 06/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 07/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested virt VCPU primitives for vEL2 VCPU state Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 08/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 09/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VMPIDR_EL2 and VPIDR_EL2 to sane values Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 20:17   ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:09       ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:09         ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:16         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:16           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 10/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Support virtual EL2 exceptions Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 11/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 12/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle trapped ERET from " Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 13/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 14/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle virtual EL2 registers in vcpu_read/write_sys_reg() Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 15/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 16/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.E2H specially Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 17/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Save/Restore vEL2 sysregs Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 18/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate PSTATE.M for a guest hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 19/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 20/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add accessors for SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 21/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 22/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 23/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 24/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.{TFP,FPEN} settings Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 25/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 26/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 27/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 28/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow a sysreg to be hidden from userspace only Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 29/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 30/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Forward debug traps to the nested guest Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 31/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for nested virtualization Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 32/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Only toggle cache for virtual EL2 when SCTLR_EL2 changes Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 33/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Filter out unsupported features from ID regs Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 34/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Hide RAS from nested guests Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 35/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 36/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 37/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 38/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Restrict S2 RD/WR permissions to match the guest's Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 39/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 40/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Set a handler for the system instruction traps Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 41/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate AT instructions from virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 42/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 43/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Fold guest's HCR_EL2 configuration into the host's Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 44/69] KVM: arm64: nv: arch_timer: Support hyp timer emulation Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 45/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of EL2-specific timer registers Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 46/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Load timer before the GIC Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 47/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Nested GICv3 Support Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 48/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't load the GICv4 context on entering a nested guest Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 49/69] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Emulate the HW bit in software Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 50/69] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Allow userland to set VGIC maintenance IRQ Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 51/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement maintenance interrupt forwarding Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 52/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Deal with broken VGIC on maintenance interrupt delivery Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 53/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested GICv3 tracepoints Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 54/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to request KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 55/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of FEAT_TTL TLB invalidation Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 56/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Invalidate TLBs based on shadow S2 TTL-like information Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 57/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Tag shadow S2 entries with nested level Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 58/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Add include containing the VNCR_EL2 offsets Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 59/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Map VNCR-capable registers to a separate page Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 60/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Move nested vgic state into the sysreg file Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 61/69] KVM: arm64: Add FEAT_NV2 cpu feature Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 62/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with FEAT_NV2 Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 63/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Publish emulated timer interrupt state in the in-memory state Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24 ` [PATCH v8 64/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate VNCR page when required Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25 ` [PATCH v8 65/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Enable ARMv8.4-NV support Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25 ` [PATCH v8 66/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track 'InHost' exception returns Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-31  9:25   ` [PATCH v8 67/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25 ` [PATCH v8 68/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Use FEAT_ECV to trap access to EL0 timers Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25 ` [PATCH v8 69/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Accelerate EL0 timer read accesses when FEAT_ECV is on Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31  9:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:13 ` [PATCH v8 00/69] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:13   ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 22:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 22:20     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230131092504.2880505-68-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=chase.conklin@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.