All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: mmio: new binding for MMIO accessible NVMEM devices
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:06:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203210654.GA877968-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201064717.18410-2-zajec5@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 07:47:14AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
> 
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be MMIO accessed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml       | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..27e3f6142769
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/mmio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MMIO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> +  This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by using MMIO
> +  (memory-mapped I/O access).
> +
> +  It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> +  handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> +  proper layout.

Please add some guidance based on the discussion about when this should 
and shouldn't be used. Specifically, anything with potential write 
accesses should use a device specific compatible and not the generic 
one.

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: mmio-nvmem
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  reg-io-width:
> +    description: |
> +      The size (in bytes) of the IO accesses that should be performed
> +      on the device.
> +    enum: [1, 2, 4, 8]
> +
> +required:
> +  - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    nvmem@10000 {
> +        compatible = "mmio-nvmem";
> +        reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> +    };
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: mmio: new binding for MMIO accessible NVMEM devices
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:06:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203210654.GA877968-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201064717.18410-2-zajec5@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 07:47:14AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> With the NVMEM layouts binding in place we should now use:
> 1. NVMEM device access bindings
> 2. NVMEM content description bindings
> 
> This binding allows describing NVMEM devices that can be MMIO accessed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml       | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..27e3f6142769
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mmio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/mmio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MMIO access based NVMEM
> +
> +description: |
> +  This binding describes simple NVMEM devices that can be accessed by using MMIO
> +  (memory-mapped I/O access).
> +
> +  It's a generic solution for providing NVMEM content access. The way of
> +  handling actual content may be device specific and can be described using a
> +  proper layout.

Please add some guidance based on the discussion about when this should 
and shouldn't be used. Specifically, anything with potential write 
accesses should use a device specific compatible and not the generic 
one.

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: mmio-nvmem
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  reg-io-width:
> +    description: |
> +      The size (in bytes) of the IO accesses that should be performed
> +      on the device.
> +    enum: [1, 2, 4, 8]
> +
> +required:
> +  - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    nvmem@10000 {
> +        compatible = "mmio-nvmem";
> +        reg = <0x10000000 0x10000>;
> +    };
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-01  6:47 [PATCH 0/4] nvmem: add and use generic MMIO NVMEM Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: mmio: new binding for MMIO accessible NVMEM devices Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47   ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-03 21:06   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-02-03 21:06     ` Rob Herring
2023-02-01  6:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvmem: add generic driver for devices with MMIO access Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47   ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  9:41   ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2023-02-01  9:41     ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2023-02-01 11:52   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-02-01 11:52     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-02-02  9:24   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-02-02  9:24     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-02-01  6:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmem: mtk-efuse: replace driver with a generic MMIO one Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47   ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  8:48   ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01  8:48     ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01  9:30     ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  9:30       ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01 10:46       ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01 10:46         ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01 11:01         ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01 11:01           ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01 11:11           ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01 11:11             ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01 18:54         ` Rob Herring
2023-02-01 18:54           ` Rob Herring
2023-02-01 20:15           ` Michael Walle
2023-02-01 20:15             ` Michael Walle
2023-02-02 23:44             ` Rob Herring
2023-02-02 23:44               ` Rob Herring
2023-02-01  6:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvmem: uniphier-efuse: " Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  6:47   ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  7:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] nvmem: add and use generic MMIO NVMEM Rafał Miłecki
2023-02-01  7:50   ` Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230203210654.GA877968-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.