Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som and pcm-959 dev board

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:25:08AM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> > On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote:
> > > Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and
> > > the Phytec PCM-959 development kit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v4
> > >      * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml
> > 
> > How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make
> > the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this
> > series?
> 
> Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk
> off devices one at a time?
> 
> If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple
> rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable)
> this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit
> before you sent your patch set.
> 
> 
> Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following:
> 
> 1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit.
> 2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done
>    it should be an easy rebase before submission.
> 3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update.
> 
> 
> I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your
> priorities list.

If you are willing to do #1, that's certainly my preference.

Rob