From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Yichun Zhang <yichun@openresty.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net, stable v1 1/3] virtio_net: reorder some funcs
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 01:53:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230308015204-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308024935.91686-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:49:33AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> The purpose of this is to facilitate the subsequent addition of new
> functions without introducing a separate declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
this one isn't for stable naturally, stable can use forward declarations
instead.
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb5e68ed3ec2..8b31a04052f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,52 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> return skb;
> }
>
> +static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> +{
> + unsigned int len;
> + unsigned int packets = 0;
> + unsigned int bytes = 0;
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> + if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> +
> + pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> +
> + bytes += skb->len;
> + napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> + } else {
> + struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> +
> + bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> + xdp_return_frame(frame);
> + }
> + packets++;
> + }
> +
> + /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> + * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> + */
> + if (!packets)
> + return;
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> + sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> + sq->stats.packets += packets;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> +{
> + if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> + return false;
> + else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> struct send_queue *sq,
> struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> @@ -1714,52 +1760,6 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> return stats.packets;
> }
>
> -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> -{
> - unsigned int len;
> - unsigned int packets = 0;
> - unsigned int bytes = 0;
> - void *ptr;
> -
> - while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> - if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> -
> - pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -
> - bytes += skb->len;
> - napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> - } else {
> - struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> -
> - bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> - xdp_return_frame(frame);
> - }
> - packets++;
> - }
> -
> - /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> - * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> - */
> - if (!packets)
> - return;
> -
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> - sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> - sq->stats.packets += packets;
> - u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> -}
> -
> -static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> -{
> - if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> - return false;
> - else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> - return true;
> - else
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Yichun Zhang <yichun@openresty.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net, stable v1 1/3] virtio_net: reorder some funcs
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 01:53:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230308015204-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308024935.91686-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:49:33AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> The purpose of this is to facilitate the subsequent addition of new
> functions without introducing a separate declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
this one isn't for stable naturally, stable can use forward declarations
instead.
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb5e68ed3ec2..8b31a04052f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,52 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> return skb;
> }
>
> +static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> +{
> + unsigned int len;
> + unsigned int packets = 0;
> + unsigned int bytes = 0;
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> + if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> +
> + pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> +
> + bytes += skb->len;
> + napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> + } else {
> + struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> +
> + bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> + xdp_return_frame(frame);
> + }
> + packets++;
> + }
> +
> + /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> + * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> + */
> + if (!packets)
> + return;
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> + sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> + sq->stats.packets += packets;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> +{
> + if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> + return false;
> + else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> struct send_queue *sq,
> struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> @@ -1714,52 +1760,6 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> return stats.packets;
> }
>
> -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> -{
> - unsigned int len;
> - unsigned int packets = 0;
> - unsigned int bytes = 0;
> - void *ptr;
> -
> - while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> - if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> -
> - pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -
> - bytes += skb->len;
> - napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> - } else {
> - struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> -
> - bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> - xdp_return_frame(frame);
> - }
> - packets++;
> - }
> -
> - /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> - * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> - */
> - if (!packets)
> - return;
> -
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> - sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> - sq->stats.packets += packets;
> - u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> -}
> -
> -static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> -{
> - if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> - return false;
> - else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> - return true;
> - else
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 2:49 [PATCH net, stable v1 0/3] add checking sq is full inside xdp xmit Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 2:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 2:49 ` [PATCH net, stable v1 1/3] virtio_net: reorder some funcs Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 2:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 6:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-03-08 6:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-08 2:49 ` [PATCH net, stable v1 2/3] virtio_net: separate the logic of checking whether sq is full Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 2:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 2:49 ` [PATCH net, stable v1 3/3] virtio_net: add checking sq is full inside xdp xmit Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 2:49 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 5:20 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-08 6:59 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-08 7:14 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 7:14 ` Xuan Zhuo
2023-03-08 8:13 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-08 12:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-08 12:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-03-09 1:49 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-09 6:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-11 0:50 ` [PATCH net, stable v1 0/3] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230308015204-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yichun@openresty.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.