All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310144704.1542045-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)

It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 2 +-
 drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c     | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
index 929720387102..e123de6e8c67 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int setup_static_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 static int setup_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 		       struct scmi_optee_channel *channel)
 {
-	if (of_find_property(cinfo->dev->of_node, "shmem", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(cinfo->dev->of_node, "shmem"))
 		return setup_static_shmem(dev, cinfo, channel);
 	else
 		return setup_dynamic_shmem(dev, channel);
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
index 042c2043929d..8b5e5daa9fae 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
@@ -764,19 +764,19 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto free_mrq;
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#clock-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#clock-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_clocks(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
 	}
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#reset-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#reset-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_resets(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
 	}
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_powergates(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
-- 
2.39.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310144704.1542045-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)

It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 2 +-
 drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c     | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
index 929720387102..e123de6e8c67 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int setup_static_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 static int setup_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 		       struct scmi_optee_channel *channel)
 {
-	if (of_find_property(cinfo->dev->of_node, "shmem", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(cinfo->dev->of_node, "shmem"))
 		return setup_static_shmem(dev, cinfo, channel);
 	else
 		return setup_dynamic_shmem(dev, channel);
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
index 042c2043929d..8b5e5daa9fae 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
@@ -764,19 +764,19 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto free_mrq;
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#clock-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#clock-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_clocks(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
 	}
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#reset-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#reset-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_resets(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
 	}
 
-	if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells")) {
 		err = tegra_bpmp_init_powergates(bpmp);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto free_mrq;
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring [this message]
2023-03-10 14:47 ` [PATCH] firmware: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Rob Herring
2023-03-23 12:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-03-23 12:00   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-04 13:30   ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-04 13:30     ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-04 16:58     ` Rob Herring
2023-04-04 16:58       ` Rob Herring
2023-04-04 19:52       ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-04 19:52         ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-04 19:53 ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-04 19:53   ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230310144704.1542045-1-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.