From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: iproc: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310144720.1544531-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
index fee036b07cd4..649fcb449f34 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ int iproc_msi_init(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct device_node *node)
if (!of_device_is_compatible(node, "brcm,iproc-msi"))
return -ENODEV;
- if (!of_find_property(node, "msi-controller", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "msi-controller"))
return -ENODEV;
if (pcie->msi)
@@ -585,8 +585,7 @@ int iproc_msi_init(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct device_node *node)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (of_find_property(node, "brcm,pcie-msi-inten", NULL))
- msi->has_inten_reg = true;
+ msi->has_inten_reg = of_property_read_bool(node, "brcm,pcie-msi-inten");
msi->nr_msi_vecs = msi->nr_irqs * EQ_LEN;
msi->bitmap = devm_bitmap_zalloc(pcie->dev, msi->nr_msi_vecs,
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: iproc: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310144720.1544531-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
index fee036b07cd4..649fcb449f34 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ int iproc_msi_init(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct device_node *node)
if (!of_device_is_compatible(node, "brcm,iproc-msi"))
return -ENODEV;
- if (!of_find_property(node, "msi-controller", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "msi-controller"))
return -ENODEV;
if (pcie->msi)
@@ -585,8 +585,7 @@ int iproc_msi_init(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct device_node *node)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (of_find_property(node, "brcm,pcie-msi-inten", NULL))
- msi->has_inten_reg = true;
+ msi->has_inten_reg = of_property_read_bool(node, "brcm,pcie-msi-inten");
msi->nr_msi_vecs = msi->nr_irqs * EQ_LEN;
msi->bitmap = devm_bitmap_zalloc(pcie->dev, msi->nr_msi_vecs,
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring [this message]
2023-03-10 14:47 ` [PATCH] PCI: iproc: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties Rob Herring
2023-03-13 20:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-13 20:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230310144720.1544531-1-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.