From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@intel.com>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com>,
Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>,
hock.leong.kweh@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:25:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406072504.68e032e6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406024541.3556305-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:45:41 +0800 Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
>
> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.
Why did you resend this?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Looi Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@intel.com>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
Lai Peter Jun Ann <peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com>,
Zulkifli Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>,
hock.leong.kweh@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:25:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406072504.68e032e6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406024541.3556305-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:45:41 +0800 Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote:
> Some DT devices already have phy device configured in the DT/ACPI.
> Current implementation scans for a phy unconditionally even though
> there is a phy listed in the DT/ACPI and already attached.
>
> We should check the fwnode if there is any phy device listed in
> fwnode and decide whether to scan for a phy to attach to.
Why did you resend this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 2:45 [RESEND PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: check fwnode for phy device before scanning for phy Michael Sit Wei Hong
2023-04-06 2:45 ` Michael Sit Wei Hong
2023-04-06 14:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-04-06 14:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-06 14:40 ` Sit, Michael Wei Hong
2023-04-06 14:40 ` Sit, Michael Wei Hong
2023-04-06 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-04-06 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406072504.68e032e6@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=hock.leong.kweh@intel.com \
--cc=hong.aun.looi@intel.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com \
--cc=muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com \
--cc=tee.min.tan@intel.com \
--cc=weifeng.voon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.