All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH Review V2 1/2] drm/amdgpu: fix unexpected block id
@ 2023-04-11  9:32 Stanley.Yang
  2023-04-11  9:32 ` [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag Stanley.Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley.Yang @ 2023-04-11  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amd-gfx, Hawking.Zhang, Tao.Zhou1, Guchun.Chen; +Cc: Stanley.Yang

Aldebaran supports VCN and JPEG RAS, it reports unexpected
block id message during VCN and JPEG RAS initialization if VCN
and JPEG block id not defined.

Change-Id: Icceb43556eec802f11c2077c1c58a1e92c9df599
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h | 4 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_ras_if.h  | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h
index ef38f4c93df0..17b3d1992e80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h
@@ -583,6 +583,10 @@ amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(enum amdgpu_ras_block block) {
 		return TA_RAS_BLOCK__FUSE;
 	case AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__MCA:
 		return TA_RAS_BLOCK__MCA;
+	case AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__VCN:
+		return TA_RAS_BLOCK__VCN;
+	case AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG:
+		return TA_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG;
 	default:
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "RAS ERROR: unexpected block id %d\n", block);
 		return TA_RAS_BLOCK__UMC;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_ras_if.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_ras_if.h
index 509d8a1945eb..30d0482ac466 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_ras_if.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ta_ras_if.h
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ enum ta_ras_block {
 	TA_RAS_BLOCK__MP1,
 	TA_RAS_BLOCK__FUSE,
 	TA_RAS_BLOCK__MCA,
+	TA_RAS_BLOCK__VCN,
+	TA_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG,
 	TA_NUM_BLOCK_MAX
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
  2023-04-11  9:32 [PATCH Review V2 1/2] drm/amdgpu: fix unexpected block id Stanley.Yang
@ 2023-04-11  9:32 ` Stanley.Yang
  2023-04-11  9:37   ` Zhang, Hawking
  2023-04-11 10:08   ` Lazar, Lijo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley.Yang @ 2023-04-11  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amd-gfx, Hawking.Zhang, Tao.Zhou1, Guchun.Chen; +Cc: Stanley.Yang

XGMI RAS should be according to the gmc xgmi physical nodes number,
XGMI RAS should not be enabled if xgmi num_physical_nodes is zero.

Change-Id: Idf3600b30584b10b528e7237d103d84d5097b7e0
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 4069bce9479f..c2c4d978896c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -2430,6 +2430,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_check_supported(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 			else
 				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__VCN |
 							1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG);
+
+			/*
+			 * XGMI RAS is not supported if xgmi num physical nodes
+			 * is zero
+			 */
+			if (adev->gmc.xmgi.num_physical_nodes == 0)
+				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__XGMI_WAFL);
 		} else {
 			dev_info(adev->dev, "SRAM ECC is not presented.\n");
 		}
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
  2023-04-11  9:32 ` [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag Stanley.Yang
@ 2023-04-11  9:37   ` Zhang, Hawking
  2023-04-11 10:08   ` Lazar, Lijo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Hawking @ 2023-04-11  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yang, Stanley, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhou1, Tao,
	Chen, Guchun
  Cc: Yang, Stanley

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

You might consider use ! adev->gmc.xmgi.num_physical_nodes, apart from that

Series is

Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>

Regards,
Hawking
-----Original Message-----
From: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 17:33
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: Yang, Stanley <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag

XGMI RAS should be according to the gmc xgmi physical nodes number, XGMI RAS should not be enabled if xgmi num_physical_nodes is zero.

Change-Id: Idf3600b30584b10b528e7237d103d84d5097b7e0
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 4069bce9479f..c2c4d978896c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -2430,6 +2430,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_check_supported(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
                        else
                                adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__VCN |
                                                        1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG);
+
+                       /*
+                        * XGMI RAS is not supported if xgmi num physical nodes
+                        * is zero
+                        */
+                       if (adev->gmc.xmgi.num_physical_nodes == 0)
+                               adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__XGMI_WAFL);
                } else {
                        dev_info(adev->dev, "SRAM ECC is not presented.\n");
                }
--
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
  2023-04-11  9:32 ` [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag Stanley.Yang
  2023-04-11  9:37   ` Zhang, Hawking
@ 2023-04-11 10:08   ` Lazar, Lijo
  2023-04-11 10:20     ` Yang, Stanley
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lazar, Lijo @ 2023-04-11 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yang, Stanley, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhang, Hawking,
	Zhou1, Tao, Chen, Guchun
  Cc: Yang, Stanley

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

>  if (adev->gmc.xmgi.

This looks like a typo. Should be gmc.xgmi 

Thanks,
Lijo

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Stanley.Yang
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 3:03 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: Yang, Stanley <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag

XGMI RAS should be according to the gmc xgmi physical nodes number, XGMI RAS should not be enabled if xgmi num_physical_nodes is zero.

Change-Id: Idf3600b30584b10b528e7237d103d84d5097b7e0
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 4069bce9479f..c2c4d978896c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -2430,6 +2430,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_check_supported(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 			else
 				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__VCN |
 							1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG);
+
+			/*
+			 * XGMI RAS is not supported if xgmi num physical nodes
+			 * is zero
+			 */
+			if (adev->gmc.xmgi.num_physical_nodes == 0)
+				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 << AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__XGMI_WAFL);
 		} else {
 			dev_info(adev->dev, "SRAM ECC is not presented.\n");
 		}
--
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
  2023-04-11 10:08   ` Lazar, Lijo
@ 2023-04-11 10:20     ` Yang, Stanley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yang, Stanley @ 2023-04-11 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lazar, Lijo, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhang, Hawking,
	Zhou1, Tao, Chen, Guchun

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Thanks, It's a typo, I have fixed it before be merged.

Regards,
Stanley
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 6:08 PM
> To: Yang, Stanley <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
> Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao
> <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
> Cc: Yang, Stanley <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
> 
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> 
> >  if (adev->gmc.xmgi.
> 
> This looks like a typo. Should be gmc.xgmi
> 
> Thanks,
> Lijo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Stanley.Yang
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 3:03 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zhang, Hawking
> <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Chen,
> Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
> Cc: Yang, Stanley <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
> Subject: [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag
> 
> XGMI RAS should be according to the gmc xgmi physical nodes number,
> XGMI RAS should not be enabled if xgmi num_physical_nodes is zero.
> 
> Change-Id: Idf3600b30584b10b528e7237d103d84d5097b7e0
> Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> index 4069bce9479f..c2c4d978896c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> @@ -2430,6 +2430,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ras_check_supported(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev)
>  			else
>  				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 <<
> AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__VCN |
>  							1 <<
> AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__JPEG);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * XGMI RAS is not supported if xgmi num physical
> nodes
> +			 * is zero
> +			 */
> +			if (adev->gmc.xmgi.num_physical_nodes == 0)
> +				adev->ras_hw_enabled &= ~(1 <<
> AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__XGMI_WAFL);
>  		} else {
>  			dev_info(adev->dev, "SRAM ECC is not
> presented.\n");
>  		}
> --
> 2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-11 10:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-11  9:32 [PATCH Review V2 1/2] drm/amdgpu: fix unexpected block id Stanley.Yang
2023-04-11  9:32 ` [PATCH Review V2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: correct ras enabled flag Stanley.Yang
2023-04-11  9:37   ` Zhang, Hawking
2023-04-11 10:08   ` Lazar, Lijo
2023-04-11 10:20     ` Yang, Stanley

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.