All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify IRQ test commands execution
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:35:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230415023542.77601-9-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230415023542.77601-1-dlemoal@kernel.org>

For the commands COMMAND_RAISE_LEGACY_IRQ, COMMAND_RAISE_MSI_IRQ and
COMMAND_RAISE_MSIX_IRQ, the function pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
sets the STATUS_IRQ_RAISED status flag and calls the epc function
pci_epc_raise_irq() directly. However, this is also exactly what the
pci_epf_test_raise_irq() function does. Avoid duplicating these
operations by directly using pci_epf_test_raise_irq() for the IRQ test
commands. It is OK to do so as the host side endpoint test driver always
set the correct IRQ type for the IRQ test commands.

At the same time, the IRQ number check done for the
COMMAND_RAISE_MSI_IRQ and COMMAND_RAISE_MSIX_IRQ commands can also be
moved to pci_epf_test_raise_irq() to also check the IRQ number requested
by the host for other test commands.

Overall, this significantly simplifies the pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
function.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 43 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index 3835e558937a..ee90ba3a957b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -613,6 +613,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
 	struct pci_epf *epf = epf_test->epf;
 	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
 	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
+	int count;
 
 	reg->status |= STATUS_IRQ_RAISED;
 
@@ -622,10 +623,22 @@ static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
 				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY, 0);
 		break;
 	case IRQ_TYPE_MSI:
+		count = pci_epc_get_msi(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
+		if (reg->irq_number > count || count <= 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Invalid MSI IRQ number %d / %d\n",
+				reg->irq_number, count);
+			return;
+		}
 		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
 				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI, reg->irq_number);
 		break;
 	case IRQ_TYPE_MSIX:
+		count = pci_epc_get_msix(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
+		if (reg->irq_number > count || count <= 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Invalid MSIX IRQ number %d / %d\n",
+				reg->irq_number, count);
+			return;
+		}
 		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
 				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX, reg->irq_number);
 		break;
@@ -638,13 +651,11 @@ static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
 static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	int ret;
-	int count;
 	u32 command;
 	struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = container_of(work, struct pci_epf_test,
 						     cmd_handler.work);
 	struct pci_epf *epf = epf_test->epf;
 	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
-	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
 	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
 	struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg = epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar];
 
@@ -660,10 +671,10 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 		goto reset_handler;
 	}
 
-	if (command & COMMAND_RAISE_LEGACY_IRQ) {
-		reg->status = STATUS_IRQ_RAISED;
-		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
-				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY, 0);
+	if ((command & COMMAND_RAISE_LEGACY_IRQ) ||
+	    (command & COMMAND_RAISE_MSI_IRQ) ||
+	    (command & COMMAND_RAISE_MSIX_IRQ)) {
+		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
 		goto reset_handler;
 	}
 
@@ -697,26 +708,6 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 		goto reset_handler;
 	}
 
-	if (command & COMMAND_RAISE_MSI_IRQ) {
-		count = pci_epc_get_msi(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
-		if (reg->irq_number > count || count <= 0)
-			goto reset_handler;
-		reg->status = STATUS_IRQ_RAISED;
-		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
-				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI, reg->irq_number);
-		goto reset_handler;
-	}
-
-	if (command & COMMAND_RAISE_MSIX_IRQ) {
-		count = pci_epc_get_msix(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
-		if (reg->irq_number > count || count <= 0)
-			goto reset_handler;
-		reg->status = STATUS_IRQ_RAISED;
-		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
-				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX, reg->irq_number);
-		goto reset_handler;
-	}
-
 reset_handler:
 	queue_delayed_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler,
 			   msecs_to_jiffies(1));
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-15  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-15  2:35 [PATCH v5 00/17] PCI endpoint fixes and improvements Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] PCI: endpoint: Automatically create a function specific attributes group Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] PCI: endpoint: Move pci_epf_type_add_cfs() code Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion initialization Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion detection Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] PCI: epf-test: Use dmaengine_submit() to initiate DMA transfer Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify read/write/copy test functions Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_raise_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] PCI: epf-test: Improve handling of command and status registers Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup request result handling Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify DMA support checks Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify transfers result print Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Free IRQs before removing the device Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Re-init completion for every test Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Do not write status in IRQ handler Damien Le Moal
2023-04-15  2:35 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Simplify pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] PCI endpoint fixes and improvements Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230415023542.77601-9-dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.