From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 10/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/lwt converted to inline assembly
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:42:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421174234.2391278-11-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421174234.2391278-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/lwt automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c | 234 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c | 189 --------------
3 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 33a50dbc2321..54c30fe1b693 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include "verifier_ld_ind.skel.h"
#include "verifier_leak_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_loops1.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_lwt.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_map_ret_val.skel.h"
#include "verifier_masking.skel.h"
@@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ void test_verifier_jeq_infer_not_null(void) { RUN(verifier_jeq_infer_not_null)
void test_verifier_ld_ind(void) { RUN(verifier_ld_ind); }
void test_verifier_leak_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_leak_ptr); }
void test_verifier_loops1(void) { RUN(verifier_loops1); }
+void test_verifier_lwt(void) { RUN(verifier_lwt); }
void test_verifier_map_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ptr); }
void test_verifier_map_ret_val(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ret_val); }
void test_verifier_masking(void) { RUN(verifier_masking); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5ab746307309
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("invalid direct packet write for LWT_IN")
+__failure __msg("cannot write into packet")
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ *(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_out")
+__description("invalid direct packet write for LWT_OUT")
+__failure __msg("cannot write into packet")
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ *(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("direct packet write for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ *(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_IN")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_out")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_OUT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("overlapping checks for direct packet access")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void checks_for_direct_packet_access(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = r2; \
+ r1 += 6; \
+ if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u16*)(r2 + 6); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("make headroom for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void make_headroom_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = r1; \
+ r2 = 34; \
+ r3 = 0; \
+ call %[bpf_skb_change_head]; \
+ /* split for s390 to succeed */ \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r2 = 42; \
+ r3 = 0; \
+ call %[bpf_skb_change_head]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_skb_change_head)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_OUT")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_XMIT")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("check skb->tc_classid half load not permitted for lwt prog")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__naked void not_permitted_for_lwt_prog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 0;"
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ "r0 = *(u16*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]);"
+#else
+ "r0 = *(u16*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]);"
+#endif
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + 2),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 5c8944d0b091..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,189 +0,0 @@
-{
- "invalid direct packet write for LWT_IN",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "cannot write into packet",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
-{
- "invalid direct packet write for LWT_OUT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "cannot write into packet",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT,
-},
-{
- "direct packet write for LWT_XMIT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
- "direct packet read for LWT_IN",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
-{
- "direct packet read for LWT_OUT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT,
-},
-{
- "direct packet read for LWT_XMIT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
- "overlapping checks for direct packet access",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
- "make headroom for LWT_XMIT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 34),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
- /* split for s390 to succeed */
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 42),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
- "invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
- "invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_OUT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
- "invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_XMIT",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
- "check skb->tc_classid half load not permitted for lwt prog",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
-#else
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + 2),
-#endif
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 17:42 [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/24] selftests/bpf: Add notion of auxiliary programs for test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bpf_get_stack " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/btf_ctx_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/d_path " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_packet_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/jeq_infer_not_null " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/loops1 " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_in_map " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr_mixing " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/precise " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/prevent_map_lookup " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ref_tracking " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/regalloc " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/runtime_jit " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/search_pruning " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/sock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/spin_lock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/subreg " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/unpriv " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_illegal_alu " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_ptr_arith " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-04-21 19:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 19:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 20:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230421174234.2391278-11-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.