From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 23/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_illegal_alu converted to inline assembly
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:42:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421174234.2391278-24-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421174234.2391278-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/value_illegal_alu automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c | 95 -----------
3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 94405bf00b47..56b9248a15c0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
#include "verifier_unpriv_perf.skel.h"
#include "verifier_value_adj_spill.skel.h"
#include "verifier_value.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_value_illegal_alu.skel.h"
#include "verifier_value_or_null.skel.h"
#include "verifier_var_off.skel.h"
#include "verifier_xadd.skel.h"
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ void test_verifier_unpriv(void) { RUN(verifier_unpriv); }
void test_verifier_unpriv_perf(void) { RUN(verifier_unpriv_perf); }
void test_verifier_value_adj_spill(void) { RUN(verifier_value_adj_spill); }
void test_verifier_value(void) { RUN(verifier_value); }
+void test_verifier_value_illegal_alu(void) { RUN(verifier_value_illegal_alu); }
void test_verifier_value_or_null(void) { RUN(verifier_value_or_null); }
void test_verifier_var_off(void) { RUN(verifier_var_off); }
void test_verifier_xadd(void) { RUN(verifier_xadd); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..71814a753216
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_value_illegal_alu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+ unsigned int index;
+ int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, long long);
+ __type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_hash_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 1")
+__failure __msg("R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 &= 8; \
+ r1 = 22; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+l0_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 2")
+__failure __msg("R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ w0 += 0; \
+ r1 = 22; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+l0_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 3")
+__failure __msg("R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_3(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 /= 42; \
+ r1 = 22; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+l0_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 4")
+__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_4(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = be64 r0; \
+ r1 = 22; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+l0_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("map element value illegal alu op, 5")
+__failure __msg("R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'")
+__msg_unpriv("leaking pointer from stack off -8")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void value_illegal_alu_op_5(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r1; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r3 = 4096; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r0; \
+ lock *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) += r3; \
+ r0 = *(u64*)(r2 + 0); \
+ r1 = 22; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+l0_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
deleted file mode 100644
index d6f29eb4bd57..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-{
- "map element value illegal alu op, 1",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr = "R0 bitwise operator &= on pointer",
- .result = REJECT,
-},
-{
- "map element value illegal alu op, 2",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr = "R0 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited",
- .result = REJECT,
-},
-{
- "map element value illegal alu op, 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, 42),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr = "R0 pointer arithmetic with /= operator",
- .result = REJECT,
-},
-{
- "map element value illegal alu op, 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
- BPF_ENDIAN(BPF_FROM_BE, BPF_REG_0, 64),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
- .errstr = "invalid mem access 'scalar'",
- .result = REJECT,
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "map element value illegal alu op, 5",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 4096),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 22),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8",
- .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'",
- .result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 17:42 [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/24] selftests/bpf: Add notion of auxiliary programs for test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bpf_get_stack " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/btf_ctx_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/d_path " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_packet_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/jeq_infer_not_null " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/loops1 " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/lwt " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_in_map " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr_mixing " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/precise " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/prevent_map_lookup " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ref_tracking " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/regalloc " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/runtime_jit " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/search_pruning " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/sock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/spin_lock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/subreg " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/unpriv " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_ptr_arith " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-04-21 19:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 19:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 20:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230421174234.2391278-24-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.