From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] dma: Allow dma_get_cache_alignment() to return the smaller cache_line_size()
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 07:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230520054209.GA319@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518173403.1150549-3-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 06:33:50PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On architectures like arm64, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is larger than most cache
> line size configurations deployed. However, the single kernel binary
> requirement doesn't allow the smaller ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Permit an
> architecture to opt in to dma_get_cache_alignment() returning
> cache_line_size() which can be probed at run-time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 2 ++
> kernel/dma/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 3288a1339271..b29124341317 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ static inline int dma_set_min_align_mask(struct device *dev,
>
> static inline int dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_CACHE_LINE_SIZE))
> + return cache_line_size();
> #ifdef ARCH_HAS_DMA_MINALIGN
> return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN;
> #endif
Maybe allowing architectures to simply override
dma_get_cache_alignment would be a little cleaner rather than adding
yet another abstraction? That might also be able to repace
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in follow on cleanup.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] dma: Allow dma_get_cache_alignment() to return the smaller cache_line_size()
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 07:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230520054209.GA319@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518173403.1150549-3-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 06:33:50PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On architectures like arm64, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is larger than most cache
> line size configurations deployed. However, the single kernel binary
> requirement doesn't allow the smaller ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Permit an
> architecture to opt in to dma_get_cache_alignment() returning
> cache_line_size() which can be probed at run-time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 2 ++
> kernel/dma/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index 3288a1339271..b29124341317 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ static inline int dma_set_min_align_mask(struct device *dev,
>
> static inline int dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_CACHE_LINE_SIZE))
> + return cache_line_size();
> #ifdef ARCH_HAS_DMA_MINALIGN
> return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN;
> #endif
Maybe allowing architectures to simply override
dma_get_cache_alignment would be a little cleaner rather than adding
yet another abstraction? That might also be able to repace
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in follow on cleanup.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 17:33 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 15:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 15:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] dma: Allow dma_get_cache_alignment() to return the smaller cache_line_size() Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-20 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-05-20 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-20 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-20 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-20 10:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-20 10:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm/slab: Simplify create_kmalloc_cache() args and make it static Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm/slab: Limit kmalloc() minimum alignment to dma_get_cache_alignment() Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] drivers/base: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 9:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-19 9:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] drivers/gpu: " Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] drivers/usb: " Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 9:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-19 9:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] drivers/spi: " Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] drivers/md: " Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] arm64: Allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smaller cache_line_size() Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] scatterlist: Add dedicated config for DMA flags Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-20 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-20 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] dma-mapping: Force bouncing if the kmalloc() size is not cache-line-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-20 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-20 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] iommu/dma: Force bouncing if the size is not cacheline-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 12:29 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-19 12:29 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-19 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 14:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 15:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 15:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 17:09 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-19 17:09 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-22 7:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-22 7:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-23 15:47 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-23 15:47 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm: slab: Reduce the kmalloc() minimum alignment if DMA bouncing possible Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 11:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-19 11:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] arm64: Enable ARCH_WANT_KMALLOC_DMA_BOUNCE for arm64 Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Linus Torvalds
2023-05-18 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-18 18:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-18 18:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-18 18:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 18:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 18:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-05-18 18:46 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230520054209.GA319@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.