All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_srichara@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add support for param_page read exec_ops
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522154916.3bb7be4e@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511133017.6307-4-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>

Hi Md,

quic_mdalam@quicinc.com wrote on Thu, 11 May 2023 19:00:15 +0530:

> This change will add exec_ops for PARAM_PAGE_READ command.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Change in [v2]
> 
> * Missed to post Cover-letter, so posting v2 patch with cover-letter
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index d2f2a8971907..8717d5086f80 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -3086,7 +3086,96 @@ static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_su
>  
>  static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_subop *subop)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> +	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> +	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
> +	unsigned int op_id = 0;
> +	unsigned int len = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
> +
> +	q_op.cmd_reg |= PAGE_ACC | LAST_PAGE;
> +
> +	pre_command(host, NAND_CMD_PARAM);
> +	/*
> +	 * NAND_CMD_PARAM is called before we know much about the FLASH chip
> +	 * in use. we configure the controller to perform a raw read of 512
> +	 * bytes to read onfi params

There is no guess to do, just follow what the core asks.

> +	 */
> +	if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg);
> +	else
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg);

There is something wrong here.

> +
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR0, 0);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR1, 0);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 0 << CW_PER_PAGE
> +					| 512 << UD_SIZE_BYTES
> +					| 5 << NUM_ADDR_CYCLES
> +					| 0 << SPARE_SIZE_BYTES);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG1, 7 << NAND_RECOVERY_CYCLES
> +					| 0 << CS_ACTIVE_BSY
> +					| 17 << BAD_BLOCK_BYTE_NUM
> +					| 1 << BAD_BLOCK_IN_SPARE_AREA
> +					| 2 << WR_RD_BSY_GAP
> +					| 0 << WIDE_FLASH
> +					| 1 << DEV0_CFG1_ECC_DISABLE);
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EBI2_ECC_BUF_CFG, 1 << ECC_CFG_ECC_DISABLE);
> +
> +	/* configure CMD1 and VLD for ONFI param probing in QPIC v1 */
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD,
> +			      (nandc->vld & ~READ_START_VLD));
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD1,
> +			      (nandc->cmd1 & ~(0xFF << READ_ADDR))
> +			      | NAND_CMD_PARAM << READ_ADDR);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
> +
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE, nandc->cmd1);
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, nandc->vld);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, 512, 1);
> +
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD1, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc->buf_count = 512;

The length is provided by the instruction.

> +	memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);
> +
> +	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);
> +
> +	read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer,
> +		      nandc->buf_count, 0);
> +
> +	/* restore CMD1 and VLD regs */
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE, 1, 0);
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = submit_descs(nandc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure in sbumitting param page descriptor\n");
> +
> +	free_descs(nandc);
> +
> +	ret = qcom_wait_rdy_poll(chip, q_op.rdy_timeout_ms);
> +
> +	instr = q_op.data_instr;
> +	op_id = q_op.data_instr_idx;
> +	len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
> +	memcpy(instr->ctx.data.buf.in, nandc->data_buffer, len);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int qcom_read_id_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subop *subop)


Thanks,
Miquèl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
Cc: mani@kernel.org, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_srichara@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add support for param_page read exec_ops
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:49:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522154916.3bb7be4e@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511133017.6307-4-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>

Hi Md,

quic_mdalam@quicinc.com wrote on Thu, 11 May 2023 19:00:15 +0530:

> This change will add exec_ops for PARAM_PAGE_READ command.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Change in [v2]
> 
> * Missed to post Cover-letter, so posting v2 patch with cover-letter
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index d2f2a8971907..8717d5086f80 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -3086,7 +3086,96 @@ static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_su
>  
>  static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_subop *subop)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> +	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> +	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
> +	unsigned int op_id = 0;
> +	unsigned int len = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
> +
> +	q_op.cmd_reg |= PAGE_ACC | LAST_PAGE;
> +
> +	pre_command(host, NAND_CMD_PARAM);
> +	/*
> +	 * NAND_CMD_PARAM is called before we know much about the FLASH chip
> +	 * in use. we configure the controller to perform a raw read of 512
> +	 * bytes to read onfi params

There is no guess to do, just follow what the core asks.

> +	 */
> +	if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg);
> +	else
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg);

There is something wrong here.

> +
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR0, 0);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR1, 0);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 0 << CW_PER_PAGE
> +					| 512 << UD_SIZE_BYTES
> +					| 5 << NUM_ADDR_CYCLES
> +					| 0 << SPARE_SIZE_BYTES);
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG1, 7 << NAND_RECOVERY_CYCLES
> +					| 0 << CS_ACTIVE_BSY
> +					| 17 << BAD_BLOCK_BYTE_NUM
> +					| 1 << BAD_BLOCK_IN_SPARE_AREA
> +					| 2 << WR_RD_BSY_GAP
> +					| 0 << WIDE_FLASH
> +					| 1 << DEV0_CFG1_ECC_DISABLE);
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EBI2_ECC_BUF_CFG, 1 << ECC_CFG_ECC_DISABLE);
> +
> +	/* configure CMD1 and VLD for ONFI param probing in QPIC v1 */
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD,
> +			      (nandc->vld & ~READ_START_VLD));
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD1,
> +			      (nandc->cmd1 & ~(0xFF << READ_ADDR))
> +			      | NAND_CMD_PARAM << READ_ADDR);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
> +
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE, nandc->cmd1);
> +		nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, nandc->vld);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, 512, 1);
> +
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD1, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
> +
> +	nandc->buf_count = 512;

The length is provided by the instruction.

> +	memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);
> +
> +	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);
> +
> +	read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer,
> +		      nandc->buf_count, 0);
> +
> +	/* restore CMD1 and VLD regs */
> +	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE, 1, 0);
> +		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = submit_descs(nandc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure in sbumitting param page descriptor\n");
> +
> +	free_descs(nandc);
> +
> +	ret = qcom_wait_rdy_poll(chip, q_op.rdy_timeout_ms);
> +
> +	instr = q_op.data_instr;
> +	op_id = q_op.data_instr_idx;
> +	len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
> +	memcpy(instr->ctx.data.buf.in, nandc->data_buffer, len);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int qcom_read_id_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subop *subop)


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-22 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11 13:30 [PATCH 0/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op() Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30 ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30   ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-22 13:35   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-22 13:35     ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-24  9:13     ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-24  9:13       ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add support for reset, readid, status exec_op Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30   ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-22 13:45   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-22 13:45     ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-24  9:24     ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-24  9:24       ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-26 17:27       ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-26 17:27         ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-11 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add support for param_page read exec_ops Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30   ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-22 13:49   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-05-22 13:49     ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-24  9:28     ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-24  9:28       ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add support for read, write, erase exec_ops Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30   ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-22 13:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-22 13:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2023-05-24  9:32     ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-24  9:32       ` Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Remove legacy interface implementation Md Sadre Alam
2023-05-11 13:30   ` Md Sadre Alam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230522154916.3bb7be4e@xps-13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_srichara@quicinc.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.