Re: [OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

Re: [OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

[Alexis Lothoré]

On 5/22/23 16:52, Alexis Lothoré via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have been briefed about the need to add an infrastructure to be able to
> retrieve some test files (test output, logs, etc) in Yocto/CI
> automation to ease debugging of some hard-to-reproduce issues. Before
> starting to implement a solution, I would like to get some feedback about
> what I have understood from the original issue and what I propose to
> implement to improve this. Please find below my reflexions, feel free
> to comment, correct, enrich and/or approve.
> 
> # Motivation
> 
> Some test failures appearing in automatic testing can be hard to fix, based
> on too few informations from failing tests (see
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901 ). Sometimes
> packages/binaries under test are able to generate more detailed output in a
> dedicated file, but there is actually no standardized way of retrieving
> such output files. There has been some custom efforts done to solve this issue
> for specific recipes, for example for lttng-tools tests :
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=2ea27691aa57951aaba3cc1714a080a112d15408 
> 
> The goal of this RFC is to propose an architecture for a generic system which
> allows to retrieve an arbitrary list of files from a test run.
> 
> # Use case example
> 
> lttng-tools recipe provides LTTNG tools tests as ptests (see
> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/run-ptest) and generate some log
> files (error.log, test-suite.log), it would be convenient to retrieve those
> files.
> 
> # Proposal
> 
> - Introduce an "artifacts.conf" file
>   - this file contains a "files of interest" list to be retrieved onto
>     host after running ptests (exact format to be defined)
>   - artifacts.conf is specific to a ptest package and is stored next to
>     run-ptest script in package
>   - artifacts.conf contains, for each ptest package, the following
>     informations:
>     - name of file to retrieve
>   - artifacts.conf will be installed in target image (as for
>     package-specific run-ptest script)
>   - each ptest package MAY have an artifacts.conf file
> - When running ptests, for each available ptest, ptest-runner (on the
>   target) will read artifacts.conf if it exists, and retrieve
>   corresponding artifacts file in an artifacts directory, with one
>   subdirectory per ptest.
>   - Artifacts will be aggregated only if at least one test has a status
>     different from "PASS"
> - Once tests are finished, tests manager on host (ptest.py) will fetch
>   artifacts directory. It will put this directory alongside testresults
>   file on host
> - This mechanism will work for both real targets and emulated targets
>   (Qemu), and will based on SSH to transfer artifacts back to host
> 
> # Additional questions
> 
> - once retrieved from target, aside from default test results directory
>   (build/tmp/log/oeqa/<...>), where should we store artifacts ? For
>   automated testing, should we publish them alongside other test and
>   regression reports (in web server directory) ?
> - current proposal is focused on ptests: should I broaden the scope and
>   include all kind of runtime tests (as found in
>   meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases ?)
> - are there examples of tests producing files to retrieve with non-static
>   names (which will then require the artifacts.conf to be smarter) ? 
> 

Fixing Alexandre Belloni's address in CC, sorry for the noise

-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Re: [OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

[Alexander Kanavin]

I think having to write a custom artifacts.conf for each ptest is not
a good direction, as it's both too much work, and requires good
understanding what is important in the output and what isn't :) When a
ptest fails, it would be enough to simply make a tarball of
/usr/lib/component/ptest/ with everything in it. Maybe /tmp and
/var/log as well.

Alex

On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 16:58, Alexis Lothoré via
lists.openembedded.org
<alexis.lothore=bootlin.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/22/23 16:52, Alexis Lothoré via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > I have been briefed about the need to add an infrastructure to be able to
> > retrieve some test files (test output, logs, etc) in Yocto/CI
> > automation to ease debugging of some hard-to-reproduce issues. Before
> > starting to implement a solution, I would like to get some feedback about
> > what I have understood from the original issue and what I propose to
> > implement to improve this. Please find below my reflexions, feel free
> > to comment, correct, enrich and/or approve.
> >
> > # Motivation
> >
> > Some test failures appearing in automatic testing can be hard to fix, based
> > on too few informations from failing tests (see
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901 ). Sometimes
> > packages/binaries under test are able to generate more detailed output in a
> > dedicated file, but there is actually no standardized way of retrieving
> > such output files. There has been some custom efforts done to solve this issue
> > for specific recipes, for example for lttng-tools tests :
> > https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=2ea27691aa57951aaba3cc1714a080a112d15408
> >
> > The goal of this RFC is to propose an architecture for a generic system which
> > allows to retrieve an arbitrary list of files from a test run.
> >
> > # Use case example
> >
> > lttng-tools recipe provides LTTNG tools tests as ptests (see
> > meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/run-ptest) and generate some log
> > files (error.log, test-suite.log), it would be convenient to retrieve those
> > files.
> >
> > # Proposal
> >
> > - Introduce an "artifacts.conf" file
> >   - this file contains a "files of interest" list to be retrieved onto
> >     host after running ptests (exact format to be defined)
> >   - artifacts.conf is specific to a ptest package and is stored next to
> >     run-ptest script in package
> >   - artifacts.conf contains, for each ptest package, the following
> >     informations:
> >     - name of file to retrieve
> >   - artifacts.conf will be installed in target image (as for
> >     package-specific run-ptest script)
> >   - each ptest package MAY have an artifacts.conf file
> > - When running ptests, for each available ptest, ptest-runner (on the
> >   target) will read artifacts.conf if it exists, and retrieve
> >   corresponding artifacts file in an artifacts directory, with one
> >   subdirectory per ptest.
> >   - Artifacts will be aggregated only if at least one test has a status
> >     different from "PASS"
> > - Once tests are finished, tests manager on host (ptest.py) will fetch
> >   artifacts directory. It will put this directory alongside testresults
> >   file on host
> > - This mechanism will work for both real targets and emulated targets
> >   (Qemu), and will based on SSH to transfer artifacts back to host
> >
> > # Additional questions
> >
> > - once retrieved from target, aside from default test results directory
> >   (build/tmp/log/oeqa/<...>), where should we store artifacts ? For
> >   automated testing, should we publish them alongside other test and
> >   regression reports (in web server directory) ?
> > - current proposal is focused on ptests: should I broaden the scope and
> >   include all kind of runtime tests (as found in
> >   meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases ?)
> > - are there examples of tests producing files to retrieve with non-static
> >   names (which will then require the artifacts.conf to be smarter) ?
> >
>
> Fixing Alexandre Belloni's address in CC, sorry for the noise
>
> --
> Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#181597): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181597
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99066378/1686489
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

Re: [OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

[Alexis Lothoré]

Hello Alexander, thanks for the feedback

On 5/23/23 11:50, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> I think having to write a custom artifacts.conf for each ptest is not
> a good direction, as it's both too much work, and requires good
> understanding what is important in the output and what isn't :) When a
> ptest fails, it would be enough to simply make a tarball of
> /usr/lib/component/ptest/ with everything in it. Maybe /tmp and
> /var/log as well.

Indeed, it can be tedious to write an artifacts conf file for each ptest.
If it is tolerable to get an archive of the whole ptest directory (+ possibly
/var/log and /tmp), we can go for it and fine-tune later if needed. In this
case, I could either keep artifacts.conf to list the directories we want for all
ptests, or completely drop it.

I will let this RFC run for more time before starting to implement something,
but if no one come back on this, I will apply your suggestion.

Kind regards,

> 
> Alex
> 
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 16:58, Alexis Lothoré via
> lists.openembedded.org
> <alexis.lothore=bootlin.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/22/23 16:52, Alexis Lothoré via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I have been briefed about the need to add an infrastructure to be able to
>>> retrieve some test files (test output, logs, etc) in Yocto/CI
>>> automation to ease debugging of some hard-to-reproduce issues. Before
>>> starting to implement a solution, I would like to get some feedback about
>>> what I have understood from the original issue and what I propose to
>>> implement to improve this. Please find below my reflexions, feel free
>>> to comment, correct, enrich and/or approve.
>>>
>>> # Motivation
>>>
>>> Some test failures appearing in automatic testing can be hard to fix, based
>>> on too few informations from failing tests (see
>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901 ). Sometimes
>>> packages/binaries under test are able to generate more detailed output in a
>>> dedicated file, but there is actually no standardized way of retrieving
>>> such output files. There has been some custom efforts done to solve this issue
>>> for specific recipes, for example for lttng-tools tests :
>>> https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=2ea27691aa57951aaba3cc1714a080a112d15408
>>>
>>> The goal of this RFC is to propose an architecture for a generic system which
>>> allows to retrieve an arbitrary list of files from a test run.
>>>
>>> # Use case example
>>>
>>> lttng-tools recipe provides LTTNG tools tests as ptests (see
>>> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/run-ptest) and generate some log
>>> files (error.log, test-suite.log), it would be convenient to retrieve those
>>> files.
>>>
>>> # Proposal
>>>
>>> - Introduce an "artifacts.conf" file
>>>   - this file contains a "files of interest" list to be retrieved onto
>>>     host after running ptests (exact format to be defined)
>>>   - artifacts.conf is specific to a ptest package and is stored next to
>>>     run-ptest script in package
>>>   - artifacts.conf contains, for each ptest package, the following
>>>     informations:
>>>     - name of file to retrieve
>>>   - artifacts.conf will be installed in target image (as for
>>>     package-specific run-ptest script)
>>>   - each ptest package MAY have an artifacts.conf file
>>> - When running ptests, for each available ptest, ptest-runner (on the
>>>   target) will read artifacts.conf if it exists, and retrieve
>>>   corresponding artifacts file in an artifacts directory, with one
>>>   subdirectory per ptest.
>>>   - Artifacts will be aggregated only if at least one test has a status
>>>     different from "PASS"
>>> - Once tests are finished, tests manager on host (ptest.py) will fetch
>>>   artifacts directory. It will put this directory alongside testresults
>>>   file on host
>>> - This mechanism will work for both real targets and emulated targets
>>>   (Qemu), and will based on SSH to transfer artifacts back to host
>>>
>>> # Additional questions
>>>
>>> - once retrieved from target, aside from default test results directory
>>>   (build/tmp/log/oeqa/<...>), where should we store artifacts ? For
>>>   automated testing, should we publish them alongside other test and
>>>   regression reports (in web server directory) ?
>>> - current proposal is focused on ptests: should I broaden the scope and
>>>   include all kind of runtime tests (as found in
>>>   meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases ?)
>>> - are there examples of tests producing files to retrieve with non-static
>>>   names (which will then require the artifacts.conf to be smarter) ?
>>>
>>
>> Fixing Alexandre Belloni's address in CC, sorry for the noise
>>
>> --
>> Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
>> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
>> https://bootlin.com
>>
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#181597): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181597
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99066378/1686489
>> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>

-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Re: [OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 23/05/2023 17:37:25+0200, Alexis Lothor� wrote:
> Hello Alexander, thanks for the feedback
> 
> On 5/23/23 11:50, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > I think having to write a custom artifacts.conf for each ptest is not
> > a good direction, as it's both too much work, and requires good
> > understanding what is important in the output and what isn't :) When a
> > ptest fails, it would be enough to simply make a tarball of
> > /usr/lib/component/ptest/ with everything in it. Maybe /tmp and
> > /var/log as well.
> 
> Indeed, it can be tedious to write an artifacts conf file for each ptest.
> If it is tolerable to get an archive of the whole ptest directory (+ possibly
> /var/log and /tmp), we can go for it and fine-tune later if needed. In this
> case, I could either keep artifacts.conf to list the directories we want for all
> ptests, or completely drop it.
> 
> I will let this RFC run for more time before starting to implement something,
> but if no one come back on this, I will apply your suggestion.
> 

I think the requirement that I didn't convey properly is that there
should be one global conf file for the build.

> Kind regards,
> 
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 16:58, Alexis Lothor� via
> > lists.openembedded.org
> > <alexis.lothore=bootlin.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/22/23 16:52, Alexis Lothor� via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>> I have been briefed about the need to add an infrastructure to be able to
> >>> retrieve some test files (test output, logs, etc) in Yocto/CI
> >>> automation to ease debugging of some hard-to-reproduce issues. Before
> >>> starting to implement a solution, I would like to get some feedback about
> >>> what I have understood from the original issue and what I propose to
> >>> implement to improve this. Please find below my reflexions, feel free
> >>> to comment, correct, enrich and/or approve.
> >>>
> >>> # Motivation
> >>>
> >>> Some test failures appearing in automatic testing can be hard to fix, based
> >>> on too few informations from failing tests (see
> >>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901 ). Sometimes
> >>> packages/binaries under test are able to generate more detailed output in a
> >>> dedicated file, but there is actually no standardized way of retrieving
> >>> such output files. There has been some custom efforts done to solve this issue
> >>> for specific recipes, for example for lttng-tools tests :
> >>> https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=2ea27691aa57951aaba3cc1714a080a112d15408
> >>>
> >>> The goal of this RFC is to propose an architecture for a generic system which
> >>> allows to retrieve an arbitrary list of files from a test run.
> >>>
> >>> # Use case example
> >>>
> >>> lttng-tools recipe provides LTTNG tools tests as ptests (see
> >>> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/run-ptest) and generate some log
> >>> files (error.log, test-suite.log), it would be convenient to retrieve those
> >>> files.
> >>>
> >>> # Proposal
> >>>
> >>> - Introduce an "artifacts.conf" file
> >>>   - this file contains a "files of interest" list to be retrieved onto
> >>>     host after running ptests (exact format to be defined)
> >>>   - artifacts.conf is specific to a ptest package and is stored next to
> >>>     run-ptest script in package
> >>>   - artifacts.conf contains, for each ptest package, the following
> >>>     informations:
> >>>     - name of file to retrieve
> >>>   - artifacts.conf will be installed in target image (as for
> >>>     package-specific run-ptest script)
> >>>   - each ptest package MAY have an artifacts.conf file
> >>> - When running ptests, for each available ptest, ptest-runner (on the
> >>>   target) will read artifacts.conf if it exists, and retrieve
> >>>   corresponding artifacts file in an artifacts directory, with one
> >>>   subdirectory per ptest.
> >>>   - Artifacts will be aggregated only if at least one test has a status
> >>>     different from "PASS"
> >>> - Once tests are finished, tests manager on host (ptest.py) will fetch
> >>>   artifacts directory. It will put this directory alongside testresults
> >>>   file on host
> >>> - This mechanism will work for both real targets and emulated targets
> >>>   (Qemu), and will based on SSH to transfer artifacts back to host
> >>>
> >>> # Additional questions
> >>>
> >>> - once retrieved from target, aside from default test results directory
> >>>   (build/tmp/log/oeqa/<...>), where should we store artifacts ? For
> >>>   automated testing, should we publish them alongside other test and
> >>>   regression reports (in web server directory) ?
> >>> - current proposal is focused on ptests: should I broaden the scope and
> >>>   include all kind of runtime tests (as found in
> >>>   meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases ?)
> >>> - are there examples of tests producing files to retrieve with non-static
> >>>   names (which will then require the artifacts.conf to be smarter) ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Fixing Alexandre Belloni's address in CC, sorry for the noise
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alexis Lothor�, Bootlin
> >> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> >> https://bootlin.com
> >>
> >>
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >> View/Reply Online (#181597): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181597
> >> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99066378/1686489
> >> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alex.kanavin@gmail.com]
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >>
> 
> -- 
> Alexis Lothor�, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[OE-core][RFC] tests artifacts retriever

[Alexis Lothoré]

Hello everyone,
I have been briefed about the need to add an infrastructure to be able to
retrieve some test files (test output, logs, etc) in Yocto/CI
automation to ease debugging of some hard-to-reproduce issues. Before
starting to implement a solution, I would like to get some feedback about
what I have understood from the original issue and what I propose to
implement to improve this. Please find below my reflexions, feel free
to comment, correct, enrich and/or approve.

# Motivation

Some test failures appearing in automatic testing can be hard to fix, based
on too few informations from failing tests (see
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901 ). Sometimes
packages/binaries under test are able to generate more detailed output in a
dedicated file, but there is actually no standardized way of retrieving
such output files. There has been some custom efforts done to solve this issue
for specific recipes, for example for lttng-tools tests :
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=2ea27691aa57951aaba3cc1714a080a112d15408 

The goal of this RFC is to propose an architecture for a generic system which
allows to retrieve an arbitrary list of files from a test run.

# Use case example

lttng-tools recipe provides LTTNG tools tests as ptests (see
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/run-ptest) and generate some log
files (error.log, test-suite.log), it would be convenient to retrieve those
files.

# Proposal

- Introduce an "artifacts.conf" file
  - this file contains a "files of interest" list to be retrieved onto
    host after running ptests (exact format to be defined)
  - artifacts.conf is specific to a ptest package and is stored next to
    run-ptest script in package
  - artifacts.conf contains, for each ptest package, the following
    informations:
    - name of file to retrieve
  - artifacts.conf will be installed in target image (as for
    package-specific run-ptest script)
  - each ptest package MAY have an artifacts.conf file
- When running ptests, for each available ptest, ptest-runner (on the
  target) will read artifacts.conf if it exists, and retrieve
  corresponding artifacts file in an artifacts directory, with one
  subdirectory per ptest.
  - Artifacts will be aggregated only if at least one test has a status
    different from "PASS"
- Once tests are finished, tests manager on host (ptest.py) will fetch
  artifacts directory. It will put this directory alongside testresults
  file on host
- This mechanism will work for both real targets and emulated targets
  (Qemu), and will based on SSH to transfer artifacts back to host

# Additional questions

- once retrieved from target, aside from default test results directory
  (build/tmp/log/oeqa/<...>), where should we store artifacts ? For
  automated testing, should we publish them alongside other test and
  regression reports (in web server directory) ?
- current proposal is focused on ptests: should I broaden the scope and
  include all kind of runtime tests (as found in
  meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases ?)
- are there examples of tests producing files to retrieve with non-static
  names (which will then require the artifacts.conf to be smarter) ?