From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, jes@trained-monkey.org,
pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, logang@deltatee.com, song@kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tests 5/5] tests: add a regression test for raid456 deadlock
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:09:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524110938.00005999@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523133900.3149123-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On Tue, 23 May 2023 21:39:00 +0800
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> The deadlock is described in [1], as the last patch described, it's
> fixed first by [2], however this fix will be reverted and the deadlock
> is supposed to be fixed by [3].
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/5ed54ffc-ce82-bf66-4eff-390cb23bc1ac@molgen.mpg.de/T/#t
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20220621031129.24778-1-guoqing.jiang@linux.dev/
> [3]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20230322064122.2384589-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> tests/24raid456deadlock | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/24raid456deadlock
>
> diff --git a/tests/24raid456deadlock b/tests/24raid456deadlock
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..161c3ab8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/24raid456deadlock
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +devs="$dev0 $dev1 $dev2 $dev3 $dev4 $dev5"
> +runtime=120
> +pid=""
> +old=`cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio`
> +
> +test_write_action()
> +{
> + while true; do
> + echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action &> /dev/null
> + sleep 0.1
> + echo idle > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action &> /dev/null
> + done
> +}
> +
> +test_write_back()
> +{
> + fio -filename=$md0 -bs=4k -rw=write -numjobs=1 -name=test \
> + -time_based -runtime=$runtime &> /dev/null
> +}
> +
> +set_up_test()
> +{
> + fio -h &> /dev/null || die "fio not found"
> +
> + # create a simple raid6
> + mdadm -Cv -R -n 6 -l6 $md0 $devs --assume-clean || die "create raid6
> failed" +
> + # trigger dirty pages write back
> + echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> +}
> +
> +clean_up_test()
> +{
> + echo $old > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> +
> + kill -9 $pid
> + sync $md0
> +
> + if ! mdadm -S $md0; then
> + die "can't stop array, deadlock is probably triggered"
> + fi
Stop is problematic, I described why in previous patch.
You can clean up array manually by ( I think you should to limit complexity):
echo inactive > /sys/block/mdX/md/array_state
echo clear > /sys/block/mdX/md/array_state
Probably, one of those actions will hang right? The question is how we can
catch it.
I'm fine with current approach too:
Acked-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Mariusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-23 13:38 [PATCH tests 0/5] tests: add some regression tests Yu Kuai
2023-05-23 13:38 ` [PATCH tests 1/5] tests: add a new test to check if pluged bio is unlimited for raid10 Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 7:53 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-24 8:26 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 9:00 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-24 9:09 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-23 13:38 ` [PATCH tests 2/5] tests: add a new test for rdev lifetime Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 8:33 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-24 9:05 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 10:38 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-23 13:38 ` [PATCH tests 3/5] tests: support to skip checking dmesg Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 8:40 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-23 13:38 ` [PATCH tests 4/5] tests: add a regression test for raid10 deadlock Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 8:48 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-24 9:07 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-23 13:39 ` [PATCH tests 5/5] tests: add a regression test for raid456 deadlock Yu Kuai
2023-05-24 9:09 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk [this message]
2023-05-24 7:56 ` [PATCH tests 0/5] tests: add some regression tests Paul Menzel
2023-05-24 9:11 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230524110938.00005999@linux.intel.com \
--to=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.