From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"zbr@ioremap.net" <zbr@ioremap.net>,
"brauner@kernel.org" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"ecree.xilinx@gmail.com" <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"socketcan@hartkopp.net" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"petrm@nvidia.com" <petrm@nvidia.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:43:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601094314.61aa2d5b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6A9C1580-8B7B-42DB-B37A-A948F68E3FFF@oracle.com>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:34:08 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > The code may have security implications, I really don't feel like I can
> > be the sole reviewer. There's a bunch of experts working at Oracle,
> > maybe you could get one of them to put their name on it? I can apply
> > the patches, I just want to be sure I'm not the _only_ reviewer.
>
> Thanks so much for your response. There is someone at Oracle who
> looked at this some time ago and is familiar enough with this to
> review the code - but he is not a kernel committer - he sends
> occasional patches upstream which get committed - would it be ok if
> he reviewed it along with you and then you could commit it? If you
> know of someone from Oracle who could also potentially review it,
> please let me know.
I meant someone seasoned. IMHO one of the benefits of employing
upstream experts for corporation like Oracle should be that you
can lean on them for reviews:
$ git log --format='%ae' --author='Oracle' --since='2 years ago' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
811 willy@infradead.org
312 rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk
91 Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com
60 vishal.moola@gmail.com
$ git log --format='%ae' --author='@oracle.com' --since='2 years ago' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
451 chuck.lever@oracle.com
154 michael.christie@oracle.com
118 nick.alcock@oracle.com
71 martin.petersen@oracle.com
59 mike.kravetz@oracle.com
58 sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com
55 liam.howlett@oracle.com
53 anand.jain@oracle.com
32 dai.ngo@oracle.com
32 allison.henderson@oracle.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-31 23:55 [PATCH v4 0/6] Process connector bug fixes & enhancements Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01 4:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01 4:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01 18:24 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01 19:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-01 19:58 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-03 20:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-02 2:32 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-03 20:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-04 18:06 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-26 23:58 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-27 17:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-11 16:04 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:15 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:34 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:43 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-06-01 16:49 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] netlink: Add new netlink_release function Anjali Kulkarni
2023-04-01 4:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] connector/cn_proc: Add filtering to fix some bugs Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] connector/cn_proc: Test code for proc connector Anjali Kulkarni
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:38 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:53 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-01 17:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-02 22:23 ` Anjali Kulkarni
2023-06-02 23:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-31 23:55 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] connector/cn_proc: Allow non-root users access Anjali Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230601094314.61aa2d5b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=anjali.k.kulkarni@oracle.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.