From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 01:15:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306020103.SKP4Pz6Z-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413-b4-vsock-dgram-v3-4-c2414413ef6a@bytedance.com>
Hi Bobby,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on ed72bd5a6790a0c3747cb32b0427f921bd03bb71]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bobby-Eshleman/vsock-dgram-generalize-recvmsg-and-drop-transport-dgram_dequeue/20230531-084049
base: ed72bd5a6790a0c3747cb32b0427f921bd03bb71
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413-b4-vsock-dgram-v3-4-c2414413ef6a%40bytedance.com
patch subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20230531 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230602/202306020103.SKP4Pz6Z-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4faf3aaf28226a4e950c103a14f6fc1d1fdabb1b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
mkdir -p ~/bin
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f69c7f6d6d618c47334134277ad9a2d3877020f5
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Bobby-Eshleman/vsock-dgram-generalize-recvmsg-and-drop-transport-dgram_dequeue/20230531-084049
git checkout f69c7f6d6d618c47334134277ad9a2d3877020f5
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash net/vmw_vsock/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306020103.SKP4Pz6Z-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:93:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:93:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:93:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:233:14: warning: no previous prototype for function 'vsock_find_bound_socket_common' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
^
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:233:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
^
static
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:652:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'vsock_bind_common' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
^
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:652:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
^
static
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:720:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'vsock_bind_stream' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
int vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
^
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:720:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
int vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
^
static
15 warnings generated.
vim +/vsock_find_bound_socket_common +233 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
232
> 233 struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
234 struct list_head *bind_table)
235 {
236 struct vsock_sock *vsk;
237
238 list_for_each_entry(vsk, bind_table, bound_table) {
239 if (vsock_addr_equals_addr(addr, &vsk->local_addr))
240 return sk_vsock(vsk);
241
242 if (addr->svm_port == vsk->local_addr.svm_port &&
243 (vsk->local_addr.svm_cid == VMADDR_CID_ANY ||
244 addr->svm_cid == VMADDR_CID_ANY))
245 return sk_vsock(vsk);
246 }
247
248 return NULL;
249 }
250
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 0:35 [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] virtio/vsock: support datagrams Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/8] vsock/dgram: generalize recvmsg and drop transport->dgram_dequeue Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 15:56 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-01 7:53 ` Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/8] vsock: refactor transport lookup code Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/8] vsock: support multi-transport datagrams Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 14:50 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 17:15 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/8] virtio/vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/8] virtio/vsock: support dgrams Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 16:09 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-31 18:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-06-01 7:54 ` Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/8] vsock: Add lockless sendmsg() support Bobby Eshleman
2023-05-31 15:42 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-31 16:22 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-01 19:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-31 0:35 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 8/8] tests: add vsock dgram tests Bobby Eshleman
2023-06-05 20:42 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] virtio/vsock: support datagrams Arseniy Krasnov
2023-05-31 21:10 ` Bobby Eshleman
2023-06-06 18:15 ` Arseniy Krasnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202306020103.SKP4Pz6Z-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.