* [PATCH] xfs: Comment out unreachable code within xchk_fscounters() @ 2023-06-06 13:37 ` cem 2023-06-06 13:43 ` Carlos Maiolino 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: cem @ 2023-06-06 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-xfs From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> Comment the code out so kernel test robot stop complaining about it every single test build. Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> --- fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c index e382a35e98d88..b1148bea7fabc 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ xchk_fscounters( */ return 0; +#if 0 /* * If ifree exceeds icount by more than the minimum variance then * something's probably wrong with the counters. @@ -489,4 +490,5 @@ xchk_fscounters( xchk_set_corrupt(sc); return 0; +#endif } -- 2.30.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: Comment out unreachable code within xchk_fscounters() 2023-06-06 13:37 ` [PATCH] xfs: Comment out unreachable code within xchk_fscounters() cem @ 2023-06-06 13:43 ` Carlos Maiolino 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2023-06-06 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-xfs On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:37:10PM +0200, cem@kernel.org wrote: > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> > > Comment the code out so kernel test robot stop complaining about it > every single test build. Please, ignore this, as commenting out the unreachable code created another warnings. I'll fix it and resend the patch. Sorry the noise. > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> > --- > fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c > index e382a35e98d88..b1148bea7fabc 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c > @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ xchk_fscounters( > */ > return 0; > > +#if 0 > /* > * If ifree exceeds icount by more than the minimum variance then > * something's probably wrong with the counters. > @@ -489,4 +490,5 @@ xchk_fscounters( > xchk_set_corrupt(sc); > > return 0; > +#endif > } > -- > 2.30.2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-06 13:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <T_8tV8A10oGZEuptzXoj3XFlD_-Ubqx0imHpEcDfSogB7Zfy2zaQhiSq2U9pkW3E65U6VKUJ46394RCv5lGGMA==@protonmail.internalid>
2023-06-06 13:37 ` [PATCH] xfs: Comment out unreachable code within xchk_fscounters() cem
2023-06-06 13:43 ` Carlos Maiolino
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.