From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 02/16] net: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) not sendpage in skb_send_sock()
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:54:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230623225513.2732256-3-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230623225513.2732256-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
Use sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than sendpage in
skb_send_sock(). This causes pages to be spliced from the source iterator
if possible.
This allows ->sendpage() to be replaced by something that can handle
multiple multipage folios in a single transaction.
Note that this could perhaps be improved to fill out a bvec array with all
the frags and then make a single sendmsg call, possibly sticking the header
on the front also.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
Notes:
ver #2)
- Wrap lines at 80.
net/core/skbuff.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index fee2b1c105fe..6c5915efbc17 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -2989,32 +2989,32 @@ int skb_splice_bits(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk, unsigned int offset,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_splice_bits);
-static int sendmsg_unlocked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
- struct kvec *vec, size_t num, size_t size)
+static int sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg)
{
struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
+ size_t size = msg_data_left(msg);
if (!sock)
return -EINVAL;
- return kernel_sendmsg(sock, msg, vec, num, size);
+
+ if (!sock->ops->sendmsg_locked)
+ return sock_no_sendmsg_locked(sk, msg, size);
+
+ return sock->ops->sendmsg_locked(sk, msg, size);
}
-static int sendpage_unlocked(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
- size_t size, int flags)
+static int sendmsg_unlocked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg)
{
struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
if (!sock)
return -EINVAL;
- return kernel_sendpage(sock, page, offset, size, flags);
+ return sock_sendmsg(sock, msg);
}
-typedef int (*sendmsg_func)(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
- struct kvec *vec, size_t num, size_t size);
-typedef int (*sendpage_func)(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
- size_t size, int flags);
+typedef int (*sendmsg_func)(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg);
static int __skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
- int len, sendmsg_func sendmsg, sendpage_func sendpage)
+ int len, sendmsg_func sendmsg)
{
unsigned int orig_len = len;
struct sk_buff *head = skb;
@@ -3034,8 +3034,9 @@ static int __skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
- ret = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sendmsg, kernel_sendmsg_locked,
- sendmsg_unlocked, sk, &msg, &kv, 1, slen);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &kv, 1, slen);
+ ret = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sendmsg, sendmsg_locked,
+ sendmsg_unlocked, sk, &msg);
if (ret <= 0)
goto error;
@@ -3066,11 +3067,18 @@ static int __skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
slen = min_t(size_t, len, skb_frag_size(frag) - offset);
while (slen) {
- ret = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sendpage, kernel_sendpage_locked,
- sendpage_unlocked, sk,
- skb_frag_page(frag),
- skb_frag_off(frag) + offset,
- slen, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+ struct bio_vec bvec;
+ struct msghdr msg = {
+ .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_DONTWAIT,
+ };
+
+ bvec_set_page(&bvec, skb_frag_page(frag), slen,
+ skb_frag_off(frag) + offset);
+ iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1,
+ slen);
+
+ ret = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sendmsg, sendmsg_locked,
+ sendmsg_unlocked, sk, &msg);
if (ret <= 0)
goto error;
@@ -3107,16 +3115,14 @@ static int __skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
int skb_send_sock_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
int len)
{
- return __skb_send_sock(sk, skb, offset, len, kernel_sendmsg_locked,
- kernel_sendpage_locked);
+ return __skb_send_sock(sk, skb, offset, len, sendmsg_locked);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_send_sock_locked);
/* Send skb data on a socket. Socket must be unlocked. */
int skb_send_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len)
{
- return __skb_send_sock(sk, skb, offset, len, sendmsg_unlocked,
- sendpage_unlocked);
+ return __skb_send_sock(sk, skb, offset, len, sendmsg_unlocked);
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-23 22:54 [PATCH net-next v5 00/16] splice, net: Switch over users of sendpage() and remove it David Howells
2023-06-23 22:54 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/16] tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp, siw: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage David Howells
2023-06-23 22:54 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/16] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-25 12:20 ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-06-26 14:00 ` David Howells
2023-06-26 15:41 ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-06-26 16:44 ` David Howells
2023-06-26 15:12 ` David Howells
2023-06-26 15:52 ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/16] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-25 12:34 ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-06-26 15:30 ` David Howells
2023-06-26 16:07 ` Ilya Dryomov
2023-06-26 17:01 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/16] rds: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH net-next v5 06/16] dlm: " David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/16] nvme-tcp: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/16] nvmet-tcp: " David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/16] smc: Drop smc_sendpage() in favour of smc_sendmsg() + MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/16] drbd: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [Drbd-dev] " David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/16] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage David Howells
2023-06-27 19:02 ` Chris Leech
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/16] scsi: target: iscsi: " David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH net-next v5 13/16] ocfs2: Fix use of slab data with sendpage David Howells via Ocfs2-devel
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH net-next v5 14/16] ocfs2: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage() David Howells via Ocfs2-devel
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 15/16] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 16/16] net: Kill MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-23 22:55 ` David Howells
2023-06-24 23:00 ` [PATCH net-next v5 00/16] splice, net: Switch over users of sendpage() and remove it patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230623225513.2732256-3-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.