From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc: thomas@t-8ch.de, arnd@arndb.de, david.laight@aculab.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] selftests/nolibc: add mmap and munmap test cases
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 21:33:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230702193306.GK16233@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90179484b62c0bafb0fad9b03680136bd6fedee3.1687957589.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
Hi Zhangjin,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 09:51:57PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Three mmap/munmap related test cases are added:
>
> - mmap_bad: the length argument must be greater than 0, otherwise, fail
> with -EINVAL.
>
> - munmap_bad: invalid (void *)-1 address fail with -EINVAL.
>
> - mmap_munmap_good: mmap() a file with good offset and then munmap().
>
> Note, it is not easy to find a unique file for mmap() in different
> scenes, so, a file list is used to search the right one:
>
> - /proc/1/exe, for 'run' and 'run-user' target
> 'run-user' can not find '/proc/self/exe'
>
> - /proc/self/exe, for 'libc-test' target
> normal program 'libc-test' has no permission to access '/proc/1/exe'
Strictly speaking, if your executable is not readable (e.g. chmod 111
due to a restrictive umask) it will also fail that one.
> - the others, for kernel without procfs
> let it pass even with 'worst case' kernel configs
You should include /dev/zero, which is commonly used to allocate anonymous
memory and is more likely present and readable than any of the other files.
And another file of choice is obviously argv[0] ;-) In this case you don't
need any of the other extra ones. Thus I could suggest that you try in this
order:
/dev/zero, /proc/self/exe, /proc/1/exe, argv[0]
and be done with it. That doesn't prevent one from extending the list if
really needed later, but I doubt it would be needed. Also, it's already
arranged in a read-write, then read-only fallbacks mode, so if we later
need to add more complex tests involving writes, the writable /dev/zero
will have precedence.
Willy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc: thomas@t-8ch.de, arnd@arndb.de, david.laight@aculab.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] selftests/nolibc: add mmap and munmap test cases
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 21:33:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230702193306.GK16233@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90179484b62c0bafb0fad9b03680136bd6fedee3.1687957589.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
Hi Zhangjin,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 09:51:57PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Three mmap/munmap related test cases are added:
>
> - mmap_bad: the length argument must be greater than 0, otherwise, fail
> with -EINVAL.
>
> - munmap_bad: invalid (void *)-1 address fail with -EINVAL.
>
> - mmap_munmap_good: mmap() a file with good offset and then munmap().
>
> Note, it is not easy to find a unique file for mmap() in different
> scenes, so, a file list is used to search the right one:
>
> - /proc/1/exe, for 'run' and 'run-user' target
> 'run-user' can not find '/proc/self/exe'
>
> - /proc/self/exe, for 'libc-test' target
> normal program 'libc-test' has no permission to access '/proc/1/exe'
Strictly speaking, if your executable is not readable (e.g. chmod 111
due to a restrictive umask) it will also fail that one.
> - the others, for kernel without procfs
> let it pass even with 'worst case' kernel configs
You should include /dev/zero, which is commonly used to allocate anonymous
memory and is more likely present and readable than any of the other files.
And another file of choice is obviously argv[0] ;-) In this case you don't
need any of the other extra ones. Thus I could suggest that you try in this
order:
/dev/zero, /proc/self/exe, /proc/1/exe, argv[0]
and be done with it. That doesn't prevent one from extending the list if
really needed later, but I doubt it would be needed. Also, it's already
arranged in a read-write, then read-only fallbacks mode, so if we later
need to add more complex tests involving writes, the writable /dev/zero
will have precedence.
Willy
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-02 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 15:40 [PATCH v4 00/10] tools/nolibc: add a new syscall helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:40 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] tools/nolibc: sys.h: add a syscall return helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:41 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] tools/nolibc: unistd.h: apply __sysret() helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:42 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] tools/nolibc: sys.h: " Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:44 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] tools/nolibc: unistd.h: reorder the syscall macros Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:45 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] tools/nolibc: add missing my_syscall6() for mips Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:47 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] tools/nolibc: __sysret: support syscalls who return a pointer Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:48 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] tools/nolibc: clean up mmap() support Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:51 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 18:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-21 18:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-22 19:08 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-22 19:08 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] selftests/nolibc: add EXPECT_PTREQ, EXPECT_PTRNE and EXPECT_PTRER Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:52 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] selftests/nolibc: add sbrk_0 to test current brk getting Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:54 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] selftests/nolibc: add mmap and munmap test cases Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 15:55 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 16:14 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-19 16:14 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-21 18:58 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-21 18:58 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-22 19:32 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-22 19:32 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-22 19:56 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-22 19:56 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-24 7:47 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-24 7:47 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:07 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] tools/nolibc: add a new syscall helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:07 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] tools/nolibc: sys.h: add a syscall return helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:08 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] tools/nolibc: unistd.h: apply __sysret() helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:11 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] tools/nolibc: sys.h: " Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:13 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] tools/nolibc: unistd.h: reorder the syscall macros Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:14 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] tools/nolibc: string.h: clean up multiple whitespaces with tab Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:17 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:19 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] tools/nolibc: arch-*.h: clean up multiple whitespaces Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:19 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 18:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 18:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 14:02 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 14:02 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] tools/nolibc: arch-loongarch.h: shrink with SYSCALL_CLOBBERLIST Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:22 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 18:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 18:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 11:28 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 11:28 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] tools/nolibc: arch-mips.h: " Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:31 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] tools/nolibc: add missing my_syscall6() for mips Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:37 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 18:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 18:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 10:13 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 10:13 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] tools/nolibc: __sysret: support syscalls who return a pointer Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:39 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 19:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 19:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 8:36 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 8:36 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 10:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 10:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 11:15 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 11:15 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:41 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] tools/nolibc: clean up mmap() support Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:41 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 19:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 19:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 6:51 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 6:51 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:44 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] selftests/nolibc: add EXPECT_PTREQ, EXPECT_PTRNE and EXPECT_PTRER Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:44 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] selftests/nolibc: add sbrk_0 to test current brk getting Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:46 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:51 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] selftests/nolibc: add mmap and munmap test cases Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-28 13:51 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 19:33 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-07-02 19:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 6:03 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 6:03 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 7:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 7:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 8:06 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 8:06 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 8:20 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-07-03 8:20 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-07-03 9:15 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 9:15 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 9:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 9:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 11:24 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-03 11:24 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-07-02 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] tools/nolibc: add a new syscall helper Willy Tarreau
2023-07-02 19:34 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230702193306.GK16233@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.