Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] staging: bcm2835-camera: Register bcm2835-camera with vchiq_bus_type

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stefan.wahren@i2se.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	athierry@redhat.com, error27@gmail.com,
	dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] staging: bcm2835-camera: Register bcm2835-camera with vchiq_bus_type
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 16:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023070309-flashback-droplet-a938@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f080a725-65ea-c3fe-896a-5ac711dddfc1@ideasonboard.com>

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:44:39PM +0200, Umang Jain wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 7/3/23 3:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:16:26PM +0200, Umang Jain wrote:
> > > Register the bcm2835-camera with the vchiq_bus_type instead of using
> > > platform driver/device.
> > > 
> > > Also the VCHIQ firmware doesn't support device enumeration, hence
> > > one has to maintain a list of devices to be registered in the interface.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
> > > ---
> > >   .../bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c           | 16 +++++++-------
> > >   .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
> > >   2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > > index 346d00df815a..f37b2a881d92 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > > @@ -24,8 +24,9 @@
> > >   #include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> > >   #include <media/v4l2-common.h>
> > >   #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include "../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h"
> > > +#include "../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_device.h"
> > >   #include "../vchiq-mmal/mmal-common.h"
> > >   #include "../vchiq-mmal/mmal-encodings.h"
> > >   #include "../vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.h"
> > > @@ -1841,7 +1842,7 @@ static struct v4l2_format default_v4l2_format = {
> > >   	.fmt.pix.sizeimage = 1024 * 768,
> > >   };
> > > -static int bcm2835_mmal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +static int bcm2835_mmal_probe(struct vchiq_device *device)
> > >   {
> > >   	int ret;
> > >   	struct bcm2835_mmal_dev *dev;
> > > @@ -1896,7 +1897,7 @@ static int bcm2835_mmal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   						       &camera_instance);
> > >   		ret = v4l2_device_register(NULL, &dev->v4l2_dev);
> > >   		if (ret) {
> > > -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: could not register V4L2 device: %d\n",
> > > +			dev_err(&device->dev, "%s: could not register V4L2 device: %d\n",
> > >   				__func__, ret);
> > >   			goto free_dev;
> > >   		}
> > > @@ -1976,7 +1977,7 @@ static int bcm2835_mmal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   	return ret;
> > >   }
> > > -static void bcm2835_mmal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +static void bcm2835_mmal_remove(struct vchiq_device *device)
> > >   {
> > >   	int camera;
> > >   	struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance = gdev[0]->instance;
> > > @@ -1988,17 +1989,16 @@ static void bcm2835_mmal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   	vchiq_mmal_finalise(instance);
> > >   }
> > > -static struct platform_driver bcm2835_camera_driver = {
> > > +static struct vchiq_driver bcm2835_camera_driver = {
> > >   	.probe		= bcm2835_mmal_probe,
> > > -	.remove_new	= bcm2835_mmal_remove,
> > > +	.remove		= bcm2835_mmal_remove,
> > No need to change this here, right?  That's independant of this patch
> > series.
> 
> Why not ?
> 
> Should I have "remove_new()"  in the struct vchiq_driver {..} [Patch 1/5]
> instead of "remove()"  -  match up with platform_driver virtual interface ?

Ah, sorry, my fault, I thought this was just a platform driver change.
This is fine.

greg k-h