From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:35:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307031131.51907BC65@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023070335-groggily-catfish-9ad5@gregkh>
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:00:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:08:00AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for
> > reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may
> > delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier
> > assigned, they should find one by themselves, for example by contacting
> > MITRE directly. However under no circumstances will a patch inclusion
> > be delayed to wait for a CVE identifier to arrive.
> >
> > This puts the responsibility for finding one in time on the reporter
> > depending on what they expect, and if they want it in the commit
> > message, they'd rather have one before reporting the problem.
>
> Oh, nice wording, let me steal that! :)
Yeah, this is good. The last sentence is a little hard to parse, so how
about this, with a little more rationale expansion:
However under no circumstances will patch publication be delayed for
CVE identifier assignment. Getting fixes landed takes precedence; the
CVE database entry will already reference the commit, so there is no loss
of information if the CVE is assigned later.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 7:14 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 18:18 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-02 12:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 4:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 18:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-07-03 19:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 19:26 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-03 19:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Kees Cook
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 15:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202307031131.51907BC65@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.