From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:35:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKMi78OUCL2N5OQB@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202307031217.95B8803@keescook>
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:26:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I still think this version of the sentence is more readable:
>
> However under no circumstances will patch publication be delayed for
> CVE identifier assignment.
>
> "patch inclusion" is less clear to me that "publication", and "be
> delayed to wait for" is redundant: a delay is a wait, and "to arrive"
> is just the assignment, which is the subject of the paragraph, so better
> to keep the language for that consistent.
I agree, I find it better as well :-)
Thanks,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 7:14 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 18:18 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-02 12:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 4:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 18:35 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-03 19:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 19:26 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-03 19:35 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-06-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Kees Cook
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 15:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKMi78OUCL2N5OQB@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.