Re: [PATCH 11/14] scsi: ufs: host: Add support for parsing OPP

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>]

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:39:18AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-07-23, 19:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 19:34, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:15:12PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On 12/07/2023 13:32, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> 
> > > > > +static int ufshcd_opp_config_clks(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table,
> > > > > +                             struct dev_pm_opp *opp, void *data,
> > > > > +                             bool scaling_down)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +   struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > +   struct list_head *head = &hba->clk_list_head;
> > > > > +   struct ufs_clk_info *clki;
> > > > > +   unsigned long freq;
> > > > > +   u8 idx = 0;
> > > > > +   int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +   list_for_each_entry(clki, head, list) {
> > > > > +           if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clki->clk)) {
> > > > > +                   freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq_indexed(opp, idx++);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                   /* Do not set rate for clocks having frequency as 0 */
> > > > > +                   if (!freq)
> > > > > +                           continue;
> > > >
> > > > Can we omit these clocks from the opp table? I don't think they serve any
> > > > purpose.
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, we cannot. OPP requires the clocks and opp-hz to be of same length.
> 
> I am okay with having a patch for the OPP core to modify this
> behavior, as I told privately earlier.
> 
> > > And we
> > > cannot omit those clocks as well since linux needs to gate control them.
> > 
> > Hmm, I thought we push the list of "interesting" clocks through
> > config->clock_names.
> 
> Yes, another way to solve this would be keep the interesting clocks in
> the beginning in "clock-names" field and let the platform pass only
> those to the OPP core.
> 
> > >
> > > > Maybe it would even make sense to move this function to drivers/opp then, as
> > > > it will be generic enough.
> > > >
> > >
> > > There is already a generic function available in OPP core. But we cannot use it
> > > as we need to skip setting 0 freq and that's not applicable in OPP core as
> > > discussed with Viresh offline.
> > 
> > Ack.
> 
> I am okay with either of the solutions, it is for you guys to decide
> what works better for your platform.
> 

We can settle with this custom callback for now. If there are drivers in the
future trying to do the same (skipping 0 freq) then we can generalize.

- Mani

> -- 
> viresh

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்