From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI/IORT: Remove erroneous id_count check in iort_node_get_rmr_info()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:00:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230727150042.GC19940@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMJ8jeLs69env0pL@lpieralisi>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:39:27PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:33:45PM +0800, Guanghui Feng wrote:
> > > > According to the ARM IORT specifications DEN 0049 issue E,
> > > > the "Number of IDs" field in the ID mapping format reports
> > > > the number of IDs in the mapping range minus one.
> > > >
> > > > In iort_node_get_rmr_info(), we erroneously skip ID mappings
> > > > whose "Number of IDs" equal to 0, resulting in valid mapping
> > > > nodes with a single ID to map being skipped, which is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Fix iort_node_get_rmr_info() by removing the bogus id_count
> > > > check.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 491cf4a6735a ("ACPI/IORT: Add support to retrieve IORT RMR reserved regions")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 3 ---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Catalin/Will,
> > >
> > > can you pick this up please ?
> >
> > Would you like it merged in 6.5 or 6.6 is fine?
>
> It is definitely a fix - I don't think that's super urgent
> though, bug has been there since v6.0 so the fix can probably
> wait to trickle back from v6.6.
On the flip side, it's a fix, Hanjun has tested it and we have a few
weeks in case we need to revert it.
So I'd be inclined to say Catalin should pick it up for 6.5, unless
there's a good reason to wait?
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI/IORT: Remove erroneous id_count check in iort_node_get_rmr_info()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:00:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230727150042.GC19940@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMJ8jeLs69env0pL@lpieralisi>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:39:27PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:33:45PM +0800, Guanghui Feng wrote:
> > > > According to the ARM IORT specifications DEN 0049 issue E,
> > > > the "Number of IDs" field in the ID mapping format reports
> > > > the number of IDs in the mapping range minus one.
> > > >
> > > > In iort_node_get_rmr_info(), we erroneously skip ID mappings
> > > > whose "Number of IDs" equal to 0, resulting in valid mapping
> > > > nodes with a single ID to map being skipped, which is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Fix iort_node_get_rmr_info() by removing the bogus id_count
> > > > check.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 491cf4a6735a ("ACPI/IORT: Add support to retrieve IORT RMR reserved regions")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 3 ---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Catalin/Will,
> > >
> > > can you pick this up please ?
> >
> > Would you like it merged in 6.5 or 6.6 is fine?
>
> It is definitely a fix - I don't think that's super urgent
> though, bug has been there since v6.0 so the fix can probably
> wait to trickle back from v6.6.
On the flip side, it's a fix, Hanjun has tested it and we have a few
weeks in case we need to revert it.
So I'd be inclined to say Catalin should pick it up for 6.5, unless
there's a good reason to wait?
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 11:33 [PATCH v3] ACPI/IORT: Remove erroneous id_count check in iort_node_get_rmr_info() Guanghui Feng
2023-07-17 11:33 ` Guanghui Feng
2023-07-18 7:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-18 7:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-18 8:54 ` guanghui.fgh
2023-07-18 8:54 ` guanghui.fgh
2023-07-18 9:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-18 9:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-18 8:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-07-18 8:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-07-19 9:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2023-07-19 9:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2023-07-26 9:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2023-07-27 13:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-27 13:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-27 13:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-27 13:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-27 14:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-27 14:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-27 15:00 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2023-07-27 15:00 ` Will Deacon
2023-07-27 15:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-27 15:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-07-28 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-28 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-28 13:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-28 13:55 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230727150042.GC19940@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.