All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com,
	helgaas@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
	leoyang.li@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, minghuan.lian@nxp.com,
	mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, roy.zang@nxp.com,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: layerscape: Add power management support for ls1028a
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:26:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802045610.GE2370@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731194010.73016-2-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> 
> Add PME_Turn_Off/PME_TO_Ack handshake sequence, and finally
> put the PCIe controller into D3 state after the L2/L3 ready
> state transition process completion.
> 

This commit message is wrong/outdated. Please describe what _this_ patch does.

> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> - Change from v5 to v6
>   change to NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS to remove #ifdef PM_CONFIG
>   
> - Change from v3 to v5
>   none
> 
> -  change at v3
>   Basic rewrite whole patch according rob herry suggestion.
>   put common function into dwc, so more soc can share the same logic.
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index ed5fb492fe084..f235c79600277 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
>   * Author: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> @@ -27,12 +29,33 @@
>  #define PCIE_ABSERR		0x8d0 /* Bridge Slave Error Response Register */
>  #define PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING	0x9401 /* Forward error of non-posted request */
>  
> +/* PF Message Command Register */
> +#define LS_PCIE_PF_MCR		0x2c
> +#define PF_MCR_PTOMR		BIT(0)
> +#define PF_MCR_EXL2S		BIT(1)
> +
>  #define PCIE_IATU_NUM		6
>  
> +struct ls_pcie;
> +

Why do you need foward declaration?

> +struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> +	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 lut_off;
> +	bool pm_support;
> +};
> +
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> +	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *lut_base;
> +	bool big_endian;
> +	bool ep_presence;

Where is this variable used?

> +	struct regmap *scfg;
> +	int index;
>  };
>  
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -73,6 +96,57 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +{
> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +{
> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		return iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);

Return value of this function is marked as void. So you should not return
anything.

> +
> +	return iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> +	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR), 100, 10000);

As I mentioned in previous patch, if you intend to use 1ms, please change the
value to 1000.

> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(pcie->pci->dev, "poll turn off message timeout\n");

dev_err? Same below.

> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> +	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S), 100, 10000);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(pcie->pci->dev, "poll exit L2 state timeout\n");

Same as above.

> +}
> +
>  static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> @@ -91,18 +165,33 @@ static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  
>  static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops ls_pcie_host_ops = {
>  	.host_init = ls_pcie_host_init,
> +	.pme_turn_off = ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg,
> +	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1043a_drvdata = {
> +	.lut_off = 0x10000,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> +	.lut_off = 0x80000,
> +	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pm_support = true,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie", },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021a_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043a_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> @@ -121,6 +210,8 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pci)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
>  	pci->dev = dev;
>  	pci->pp.ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> @@ -131,6 +222,14 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>  
> +	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
> +
> +	if (pcie->drvdata->lut_off)
> +		pcie->lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->lut_off;

Where is lut_base being used?

> +
> +	if (pcie->drvdata->pf_off)

No need of this check. In the absence of "pf_off", pf_base is going to be 0
which is anyway wrong if used. So just use "pf_off" directly.

If you really need the check, then you should use "pm_support" as below:

	if (pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
		pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;

This makes it clear that "pf_base" is only used if pm_support is enabled.

> +		pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +
>  	if (!ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> @@ -139,12 +238,41 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
>  }
>  
> +static int ls_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +
> +	if (!pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(pci);
> +}
> +
> +static int ls_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +

Remove newline.

- Mani

> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +
> +	if (!pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return dw_pcie_resume_noirq(pci);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ls_pcie_pm_ops = {
> +	NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ls_pcie_suspend_noirq,
> +				      ls_pcie_resume_noirq)
> +};
> +
>  static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_driver = {
>  	.probe = ls_pcie_probe,
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "layerscape-pcie",
>  		.of_match_table = ls_pcie_of_match,
>  		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +		.pm = &ls_pcie_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  };
>  builtin_platform_driver(ls_pcie_driver);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com,
	helgaas@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
	leoyang.li@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, minghuan.lian@nxp.com,
	mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, roy.zang@nxp.com,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: layerscape: Add power management support for ls1028a
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:26:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802045610.GE2370@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731194010.73016-2-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> 
> Add PME_Turn_Off/PME_TO_Ack handshake sequence, and finally
> put the PCIe controller into D3 state after the L2/L3 ready
> state transition process completion.
> 

This commit message is wrong/outdated. Please describe what _this_ patch does.

> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> - Change from v5 to v6
>   change to NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS to remove #ifdef PM_CONFIG
>   
> - Change from v3 to v5
>   none
> 
> -  change at v3
>   Basic rewrite whole patch according rob herry suggestion.
>   put common function into dwc, so more soc can share the same logic.
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index ed5fb492fe084..f235c79600277 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
>   * Author: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> @@ -27,12 +29,33 @@
>  #define PCIE_ABSERR		0x8d0 /* Bridge Slave Error Response Register */
>  #define PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING	0x9401 /* Forward error of non-posted request */
>  
> +/* PF Message Command Register */
> +#define LS_PCIE_PF_MCR		0x2c
> +#define PF_MCR_PTOMR		BIT(0)
> +#define PF_MCR_EXL2S		BIT(1)
> +
>  #define PCIE_IATU_NUM		6
>  
> +struct ls_pcie;
> +

Why do you need foward declaration?

> +struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> +	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 lut_off;
> +	bool pm_support;
> +};
> +
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> +	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *lut_base;
> +	bool big_endian;
> +	bool ep_presence;

Where is this variable used?

> +	struct regmap *scfg;
> +	int index;
>  };
>  
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -73,6 +96,57 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +{
> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +{
> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		return iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);

Return value of this function is marked as void. So you should not return
anything.

> +
> +	return iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> +	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR), 100, 10000);

As I mentioned in previous patch, if you intend to use 1ms, please change the
value to 1000.

> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(pcie->pci->dev, "poll turn off message timeout\n");

dev_err? Same below.

> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> +	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S), 100, 10000);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(pcie->pci->dev, "poll exit L2 state timeout\n");

Same as above.

> +}
> +
>  static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> @@ -91,18 +165,33 @@ static int ls_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  
>  static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops ls_pcie_host_ops = {
>  	.host_init = ls_pcie_host_init,
> +	.pme_turn_off = ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg,
> +	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1043a_drvdata = {
> +	.lut_off = 0x10000,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> +	.lut_off = 0x80000,
> +	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pm_support = true,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie", },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021a_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043a_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> @@ -121,6 +210,8 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pci)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
>  	pci->dev = dev;
>  	pci->pp.ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> @@ -131,6 +222,14 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>  
> +	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
> +
> +	if (pcie->drvdata->lut_off)
> +		pcie->lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->lut_off;

Where is lut_base being used?

> +
> +	if (pcie->drvdata->pf_off)

No need of this check. In the absence of "pf_off", pf_base is going to be 0
which is anyway wrong if used. So just use "pf_off" directly.

If you really need the check, then you should use "pm_support" as below:

	if (pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
		pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;

This makes it clear that "pf_base" is only used if pm_support is enabled.

> +		pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +
>  	if (!ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> @@ -139,12 +238,41 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
>  }
>  
> +static int ls_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +
> +	if (!pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(pci);
> +}
> +
> +static int ls_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +

Remove newline.

- Mani

> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +
> +	if (!pcie->drvdata->pm_support)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return dw_pcie_resume_noirq(pci);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ls_pcie_pm_ops = {
> +	NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ls_pcie_suspend_noirq,
> +				      ls_pcie_resume_noirq)
> +};
> +
>  static struct platform_driver ls_pcie_driver = {
>  	.probe = ls_pcie_probe,
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "layerscape-pcie",
>  		.of_match_table = ls_pcie_of_match,
>  		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +		.pm = &ls_pcie_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  };
>  builtin_platform_driver(ls_pcie_driver);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31 19:40 [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: dwc: Implement general suspend/resume functionality for L2/L3 transitions Frank Li
2023-07-31 19:40 ` Frank Li
2023-07-31 19:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: layerscape: Add power management support for ls1028a Frank Li
2023-07-31 19:40   ` Frank Li
2023-08-02  4:56   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-08-02  4:56     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-02  4:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: dwc: Implement general suspend/resume functionality for L2/L3 transitions Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-02  4:27   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230802045610.GE2370@thinkpad \
    --to=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=minghuan.lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.