Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] ARM: imx25: print silicon revision at startup

From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] ARM: imx25: print silicon revision at startup
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 11:23:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230806032353.GX151430@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802183849.2gzlglkskvzkgiwa@viti.kaiser.cx>

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Stephen Boyd (sboyd@kernel.org) wrote:
> 
> > You need to Cc linux-imx@nxp.com on imx clk patches. I think Abel has
> > some filter that looks for linux-clk@vger and linux-imx.
> 
> > Also, please don't send series replies to previous rounds. It buries the
> > patches deep in my MUA and my scripts don't work well to apply patches
> > when they're sent like that.
> 
> > I presume that Abel will pick the patches up? Or do you want to land
> > them through Arnd's tree? Either way feel free to add my acked-by
> 
> > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for responding, Stephen.
> 
> Ok, understood. I'll resend with Cc linux-imx@nxp.com and without the
> reply to previous versions.
> 
> Arnd, are you ok with taking these patches through your tree as
> suggested by Stephen?

I prefer to have Abel apply the patches through clk tree rather than
arm-soc tree, unless there is a good reason for them to go via the
latter.

Shawn