All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Cc: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: Error 'netif_napi_add_weight() called with weight 256'
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:37:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807093727.5249f517@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fcbab1aa2e14262bea79222bf7a4976@realtek.com>

On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:57:15 +0000 Hayes Wang wrote:
> > Perhaps Hayes Wang can comment on this (as the author of 195aae321c82).  
> 
> I test our devices on an Embedded system.
> We find the throughput is low.
> And it is caused by the weight.
> Our NAPI function often uses the whole budget.
> Finally, we increase the weight, and the throughput is good.

Could it possibly be related to handling of aggregation?
Problem must lay somewhere in USB specifics, since as I said
there are 100Gbps devices running fine with budget of 64.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31 16:02 Error 'netif_napi_add_weight() called with weight 256' Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 18:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-31 18:23   ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 20:47     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-07  9:57     ` Hayes Wang
2023-08-07 16:37       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-09 13:11         ` Hayes Wang
2023-08-09 18:37           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-14  7:07             ` Hayes Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230807093727.5249f517@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.