From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Cc: kilian.zinnecker@mail.de, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the configuration for the rockchip rk3399 built by firefly.
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 23:06:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808230609.0eaa80e8@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710212151.574040-2-robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Hello Roberto,
Thanks, this looks mostly good, but I have a few comments/questions.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:21:47 +0200
Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Uses a more recent version of TF-A which solves the building issue for
> this board.
> * Bump on U-Boot version that was used for this configuration.
> * Some minor fixes in the post-build.sh script using `shellcheck`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Kilian Zinnecker <kilian.zinnecker@mail.de>
> ---
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/extlinux.conf | 4 +++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/genimage.cfg | 22 +++++++++++++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/post-build.sh | 5 +++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/readme.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
Could you add an entry in the DEVELOPERS file referencing you as the
developer/maintainer for configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig and
board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/ ?
> diff --git a/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig b/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..91574f1d61
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +BR2_aarch64=y
> +BR2_cortex_a72_a53=y
> +BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_40_X=y
Why are you forcing binutils 2.40 here? Any reason? This is why I
didn't apply, because I don't understand if there's a solid reason for
you to do that.
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_HOSTNAME="roc-rk3399-pc"
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_ISSUE="Welcome to ROC-RK3399-PC!"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_BUILD_SCRIPT="board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/post-build.sh"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_IMAGE_SCRIPT="support/scripts/genimage.sh"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_SCRIPT_ARGS="-c board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/genimage.cfg"
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
You need to set a fixed version of the Linux kernel.
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_USE_ARCH_DEFAULT_CONFIG=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_DTS_SUPPORT=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INTREE_DTS_NAME="rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc"
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INSTALL_TARGET=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_NEEDS_HOST_OPENSSL=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_4=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_SIZE="240M"
Why this custom size rather than leaving the default?
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_GIT=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_REPO_URL="https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git"
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_REPO_VERSION="v2.9.0"
Could you use v2.9 instead? It's pointing to the same commit, but it
will make sure that our patch
boot/arm-trusted-firmware/v2.9/0001-build-tools-avoid-unnecessary-link.patch
gets applied.
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_PLATFORM="rk3399"
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_IMAGES=""
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_NEEDS_ARM32_TOOLCHAIN=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT=y
You need to set a fixed version of U-Boot.
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_BOARD_DEFCONFIG="roc-pc-rk3399"
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_DTC=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_PYTHON3=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_ATF_BL31=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_ATF_BL31_ELF=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_FORMAT_CUSTOM=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_FORMAT_CUSTOM_NAME="u-boot.itb"
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_SPL=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_SPL_NAME="idbloader.img"
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_DOSFSTOOLS=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GENIMAGE=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_MTOOLS=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS=y
Not sure here why BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS=y is needed?
Could you rework your patch to address those small aspects and send an
updated version?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas Petazzoni
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 21:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the Roberto Medina
2023-07-10 21:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the configuration for the rockchip rk3399 built by firefly Roberto Medina
2023-07-14 18:08 ` Kilian Zinnecker via buildroot
2023-07-24 11:01 ` Roberto Medina
2023-07-25 8:21 ` Da Xue
2023-08-08 21:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2023-08-11 16:28 ` Roberto Medina
2023-08-11 22:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808230609.0eaa80e8@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=kilian.zinnecker@mail.de \
--cc=robertoxmed@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.