From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbandi <kushal.bandi@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [intel-lts:4.14/yocto/base 5042/28962] drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c:758:4: warning: no previous declaration for 'get_output_link_order'
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:11:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308111828.Rosp39bL-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hi kbandi,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts.git 4.14/yocto/base
head: 65b8aaa4ae7a568d08d64eeee7b09f26f711c78f
commit: 9cef7f9b88549f0e9b46631edd29e5f619afa928 [5042/28962] media: intel-ipu: Merge IPU kernel driver into 4.14 kernel
config: i386-randconfig-i011-20230811 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230811/202308111828.Rosp39bL-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230811/202308111828.Rosp39bL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308111828.Rosp39bL-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c: In function 'max96705_write_register':
drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c:115:11: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]
if (val < 0)
^
drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c:108:6: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int ret;
^~~
drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c: At top level:
>> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c:758:4: warning: no previous declaration for 'get_output_link_order' [-Wmissing-declarations]
u8 get_output_link_order(struct max9286 *max)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/get_output_link_order +758 drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
749
750 /*
751 * Get the output link order
752 * By default:
753 * bits[7:6] 11: Link 3 is 4th in the CSI-2 output order
754 * bits[5:4] 10: Link 2 is 3rd in the CSI-2 output order
755 * bits[3:2] 01: Link 1 is 2nd in the CSI-2 output order
756 * bits[1:0] 00: Link 0 is 1st in the CSI-2 output order
757 */
> 758 u8 get_output_link_order(struct max9286 *max)
759 {
760 u8 val = 0xE4, i;
761 u8 order_config[14][3] = {
762 {1, 8, 0x27},
763 {1, 4, 0xC6},
764 {1, 2, 0xE1},
765 {1, 1, 0xE4},
766 {2, 0xC, 0x4E},
767 {2, 0xA, 0x72},
768 {2, 0x9, 0x78},
769 {2, 0x6, 0xD2},
770 {2, 0x5, 0xD8},
771 {2, 0x3, 0xE4},
772 {3, 0xE, 0x93},
773 {3, 0xD, 0x9C},
774 {3, 0xB, 0xB4},
775 {3, 0x7, 0xE4},
776 };
777
778 if (max->total_sensor_num < 4) {
779 for (i = 0; i < 14; i++) {
780 if ((max->total_sensor_num == order_config[i][0])
781 && (max->sensor_present == order_config[i][1]))
782 return order_config[i][2];
783 }
784 }
785
786 /* sensor_num = 4 will return 0xE4 */
787 return val;
788 }
789
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202308111828.Rosp39bL-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kushal.bandi@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.