[PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Remove Ian Jackson as a team member

[PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Remove Ian Jackson as a team member

[George Dunlap]

Ian Jackson is no longer involved with the Xen Project.

Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
---
 source/code-of-conduct.rst | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/source/code-of-conduct.rst b/source/code-of-conduct.rst
index 963d605..c6003bb 100644
--- a/source/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/source/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ Conduct Team members are project leadership team members from any
 sub-project. The current list of Conduct Team members is:
 
 * George Dunlap <george dot dunlap at citrix dot com>
-* Ian Jackson <ian dot jackson at citrix dot com>
 * Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini at kernel dot org>
 
 Conduct Team members are changed by proposing a change to this document,
-- 
2.40.0

[PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Update George Dunlap's email address

[George Dunlap]

Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
---
 source/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/source/code-of-conduct.rst b/source/code-of-conduct.rst
index c6003bb..6ef11c8 100644
--- a/source/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/source/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Conduct Team members
 Conduct Team members are project leadership team members from any
 sub-project. The current list of Conduct Team members is:
 
-* George Dunlap <george dot dunlap at citrix dot com>
+* George Dunlap <george dot dunlap at cloud dot com>
 * Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini at kernel dot org>
 
 Conduct Team members are changed by proposing a change to this document,
-- 
2.40.0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Remove Ian Jackson as a team member

[George Dunlap]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:32 AM George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
wrote:

> Ian Jackson is no longer involved with the Xen Project.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
>

NB that I don't consider these changes as needing a full vote; I'll check
them in on Monday unless someone wants to argue otherwise.

Thanks,
 -George

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 800 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Remove Ian Jackson as a team member

[Andrew Cooper]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]

On 18/08/2023 11:33 am, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:32 AM George Dunlap
> <george.dunlap@cloud.com> wrote:
>
>     Ian Jackson is no longer involved with the Xen Project.
>
>     Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
>
>
> NB that I don't consider these changes as needing a full vote; I'll
> check them in on Monday unless someone wants to argue otherwise.

FWIW, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

I don't see any reason to delay these at all.  No amount of community
voting is going to get Ian back, or change the email address your
employer has given you...

~Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1761 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct.rst: Remove Ian Jackson as a team member

[George Dunlap]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:45 AM Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
wrote:

> On 18/08/2023 11:33 am, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:32 AM George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ian Jackson is no longer involved with the Xen Project.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
>>
>
> NB that I don't consider these changes as needing a full vote; I'll check
> them in on Monday unless someone wants to argue otherwise.
>
>
> FWIW, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>

Thanks.


> I don't see any reason to delay these at all.  No amount of community
> voting is going to get Ian back, or change the email address your employer
> has given you...
>

Bitter experience has taught me that just because I can't *think* of any
objection doesn't mean there aren't any.  My low estimation of probability
is why I'm only giving one business day to object. :-)

 -George

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2299 bytes --]