From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: simplify support for transparent DRM bridges
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:17:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822141735.GA14396@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817145516.5924-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the patches.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:55:13PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Supporting DP/USB-C can result in a chain of several transparent
> bridges (PHY, redrivers, mux, etc). This results in drivers having
> similar boilerplate code for such bridges.
What do you mean by transparent bridge here ? Bridges are a DRM concept,
and as far as I can tell, a PHY isn't a bridge. Why does it need to be
handled as one, especially if it's completely transparent ?
> Next, these drivers are susceptible to -EPROBE_DEFER loops: the next
> bridge can either be probed from the bridge->attach callback, when it is
> too late to return -EPROBE_DEFER, or from the probe() callback, when the
> next bridge might not yet be available, because it depends on the
> resources provided by the probing device.
Can't device links help avoiding defer probing in those cases ?
> Last, but not least, this results in the the internal knowledge of DRM
> subsystem slowly diffusing into other subsystems, like PHY or USB/TYPEC.
Why so ? The PHY subsystem should provide a PHY, without considering
what subsystem it will be used by. This patch series seems to me to
actually create this DRM dependency in other subsystems, which I don't
think is a very good idea. Resources should be registered in their own
subsystem with the appropriate API, not in a way that is tied to a
particular consumer.
> To solve all these issues, define a separate DRM helper, which creates
> separate aux device just for the bridge. During probe such aux device
> doesn't result in the EPROBE_DEFER loops. Instead it allows the device
> drivers to probe properly, according to the actual resource
> dependencies. The bridge auxdevs are then probed when the next bridge
> becomes available, sparing drivers from drm_bridge_attach() returning
> -EPROBE_DEFER.
I'm not thrilled :-( Let's discuss the questions above first.
> Proposed merge strategy: immutable branch with the drm commit, which is
> then merged into PHY and USB subsystems together with the corresponding
> patch.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Moved bridge driver to gpu/drm/bridge (Neil Armstrong)
> - Renamed it to aux-bridge (since there is already a simple_bridge driver)
> - Made CONFIG_OF mandatory for this driver (Neil Armstrong)
> - Added missing kfree and ida_free (Dan Carpenter)
>
> Changes since v2:
> - ifdef'ed bridge->of_node access (LKP)
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL / MODULE_LICENSE / etc. to drm_simple_bridge
>
> Dmitry Baryshkov (3):
> drm/bridge: add transparent bridge helper
> phy: qcom: qmp-combo: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
> usb: typec: nb7vpq904m: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 44 +-------
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c | 44 +-------
> include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h | 19 ++++
> 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c
> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: simplify support for transparent DRM bridges
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:17:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822141735.GA14396@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817145516.5924-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the patches.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:55:13PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Supporting DP/USB-C can result in a chain of several transparent
> bridges (PHY, redrivers, mux, etc). This results in drivers having
> similar boilerplate code for such bridges.
What do you mean by transparent bridge here ? Bridges are a DRM concept,
and as far as I can tell, a PHY isn't a bridge. Why does it need to be
handled as one, especially if it's completely transparent ?
> Next, these drivers are susceptible to -EPROBE_DEFER loops: the next
> bridge can either be probed from the bridge->attach callback, when it is
> too late to return -EPROBE_DEFER, or from the probe() callback, when the
> next bridge might not yet be available, because it depends on the
> resources provided by the probing device.
Can't device links help avoiding defer probing in those cases ?
> Last, but not least, this results in the the internal knowledge of DRM
> subsystem slowly diffusing into other subsystems, like PHY or USB/TYPEC.
Why so ? The PHY subsystem should provide a PHY, without considering
what subsystem it will be used by. This patch series seems to me to
actually create this DRM dependency in other subsystems, which I don't
think is a very good idea. Resources should be registered in their own
subsystem with the appropriate API, not in a way that is tied to a
particular consumer.
> To solve all these issues, define a separate DRM helper, which creates
> separate aux device just for the bridge. During probe such aux device
> doesn't result in the EPROBE_DEFER loops. Instead it allows the device
> drivers to probe properly, according to the actual resource
> dependencies. The bridge auxdevs are then probed when the next bridge
> becomes available, sparing drivers from drm_bridge_attach() returning
> -EPROBE_DEFER.
I'm not thrilled :-( Let's discuss the questions above first.
> Proposed merge strategy: immutable branch with the drm commit, which is
> then merged into PHY and USB subsystems together with the corresponding
> patch.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Moved bridge driver to gpu/drm/bridge (Neil Armstrong)
> - Renamed it to aux-bridge (since there is already a simple_bridge driver)
> - Made CONFIG_OF mandatory for this driver (Neil Armstrong)
> - Added missing kfree and ida_free (Dan Carpenter)
>
> Changes since v2:
> - ifdef'ed bridge->of_node access (LKP)
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL / MODULE_LICENSE / etc. to drm_simple_bridge
>
> Dmitry Baryshkov (3):
> drm/bridge: add transparent bridge helper
> phy: qcom: qmp-combo: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
> usb: typec: nb7vpq904m: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 44 +-------
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c | 44 +-------
> include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h | 19 ++++
> 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c
> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: simplify support for transparent DRM bridges
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:17:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822141735.GA14396@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817145516.5924-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the patches.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:55:13PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Supporting DP/USB-C can result in a chain of several transparent
> bridges (PHY, redrivers, mux, etc). This results in drivers having
> similar boilerplate code for such bridges.
What do you mean by transparent bridge here ? Bridges are a DRM concept,
and as far as I can tell, a PHY isn't a bridge. Why does it need to be
handled as one, especially if it's completely transparent ?
> Next, these drivers are susceptible to -EPROBE_DEFER loops: the next
> bridge can either be probed from the bridge->attach callback, when it is
> too late to return -EPROBE_DEFER, or from the probe() callback, when the
> next bridge might not yet be available, because it depends on the
> resources provided by the probing device.
Can't device links help avoiding defer probing in those cases ?
> Last, but not least, this results in the the internal knowledge of DRM
> subsystem slowly diffusing into other subsystems, like PHY or USB/TYPEC.
Why so ? The PHY subsystem should provide a PHY, without considering
what subsystem it will be used by. This patch series seems to me to
actually create this DRM dependency in other subsystems, which I don't
think is a very good idea. Resources should be registered in their own
subsystem with the appropriate API, not in a way that is tied to a
particular consumer.
> To solve all these issues, define a separate DRM helper, which creates
> separate aux device just for the bridge. During probe such aux device
> doesn't result in the EPROBE_DEFER loops. Instead it allows the device
> drivers to probe properly, according to the actual resource
> dependencies. The bridge auxdevs are then probed when the next bridge
> becomes available, sparing drivers from drm_bridge_attach() returning
> -EPROBE_DEFER.
I'm not thrilled :-( Let's discuss the questions above first.
> Proposed merge strategy: immutable branch with the drm commit, which is
> then merged into PHY and USB subsystems together with the corresponding
> patch.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Moved bridge driver to gpu/drm/bridge (Neil Armstrong)
> - Renamed it to aux-bridge (since there is already a simple_bridge driver)
> - Made CONFIG_OF mandatory for this driver (Neil Armstrong)
> - Added missing kfree and ida_free (Dan Carpenter)
>
> Changes since v2:
> - ifdef'ed bridge->of_node access (LKP)
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL / MODULE_LICENSE / etc. to drm_simple_bridge
>
> Dmitry Baryshkov (3):
> drm/bridge: add transparent bridge helper
> phy: qcom: qmp-combo: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
> usb: typec: nb7vpq904m: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 44 +-------
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/nb7vpq904m.c | 44 +-------
> include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h | 19 ++++
> 8 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.c
> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/aux-bridge.h
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 14:55 [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: simplify support for transparent DRM bridges Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/bridge: add transparent bridge helper Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: switch to DRM_AUX_BRIDGE Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-22 13:51 ` Vinod Koul
2023-08-22 13:51 ` Vinod Koul
2023-08-22 13:51 ` Vinod Koul
2023-08-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] usb: typec: nb7vpq904m: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-17 14:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-22 12:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-22 12:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-22 12:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-22 14:17 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2023-08-22 14:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: simplify support for transparent DRM bridges Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 14:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 14:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-08-22 14:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-08-22 14:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-09-14 21:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 21:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 21:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 22:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-14 22:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-14 22:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-28 22:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-28 22:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-08-28 22:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-03 21:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-03 21:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-03 21:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-14 21:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 21:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 21:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-09-14 22:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-14 22:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-09-14 22:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230822141735.GA14396@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.