All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:11:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822191143.119c3d72@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822230037.809114-6-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:33 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> static int
>  dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -340,6 +352,7 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>  
>  	ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_first(&pin->dpll_refs);
>  	ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref);
> +
>  	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Chunk out of place

> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> index 2202310c10cd..9b612038b538 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
>  	struct dpll_pin_frequency *freq_supported;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
> +
> +size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif

The only empty line between #if and #endif that's needed is the one
between the two static inline helpers

>  struct dpll_device *
>  dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 0896aaa91dd7..36a872774173 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h>
> +#include <linux/dpll.h>

Please no includes in netdevice.h, it's included in way too many places.

All you need is a forward declaration of struct dpll_pin, AFAICT.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index ce3117df9cec..2e7df321f345 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_GSO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  	IFLA_GRO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  
> +	IFLA_DPLL_PIN,
> +

No empty lines, no idea who started this trend but let's stop it.

>  	__IFLA_MAX
>  };
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
	mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:11:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822191143.119c3d72@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822230037.809114-6-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:33 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> static int
>  dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -340,6 +352,7 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>  
>  	ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_first(&pin->dpll_refs);
>  	ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref);
> +
>  	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Chunk out of place

> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> index 2202310c10cd..9b612038b538 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
>  	struct dpll_pin_frequency *freq_supported;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
> +
> +size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif

The only empty line between #if and #endif that's needed is the one
between the two static inline helpers

>  struct dpll_device *
>  dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 0896aaa91dd7..36a872774173 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h>
> +#include <linux/dpll.h>

Please no includes in netdevice.h, it's included in way too many places.

All you need is a forward declaration of struct dpll_pin, AFAICT.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index ce3117df9cec..2e7df321f345 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_GSO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  	IFLA_GRO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  
> +	IFLA_DPLL_PIN,
> +

No empty lines, no idea who started this trend but let's stop it.

>  	__IFLA_MAX
>  };

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@intel.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
	mschmidt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:11:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822191143.119c3d72@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822230037.809114-6-vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:33 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> static int
>  dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -340,6 +352,7 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>  
>  	ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_first(&pin->dpll_refs);
>  	ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ref);
> +
>  	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Chunk out of place

> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
> index 2202310c10cd..9b612038b538 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dpll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,26 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
>  	struct dpll_pin_frequency *freq_supported;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
> +
> +size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif

The only empty line between #if and #endif that's needed is the one
between the two static inline helpers

>  struct dpll_device *
>  dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 0896aaa91dd7..36a872774173 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h>
> +#include <linux/dpll.h>

Please no includes in netdevice.h, it's included in way too many places.

All you need is a forward declaration of struct dpll_pin, AFAICT.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index ce3117df9cec..2e7df321f345 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_GSO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  	IFLA_GRO_IPV4_MAX_SIZE,
>  
> +	IFLA_DPLL_PIN,
> +

No empty lines, no idea who started this trend but let's stop it.

>  	__IFLA_MAX
>  };

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-23  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-22 23:00 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 1/9] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 2/9] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-23  2:21   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23  2:21     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23  2:21     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23 23:46     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-23 23:46       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-23 23:46       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 3/9] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 4/9] dpll: netlink: " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-23  2:11   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-23  2:11     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23  2:11     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 6/9] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 7/9] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 8/9] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 9/9] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-22 23:00   ` Vadim Fedorenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230822191143.119c3d72@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.