From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
fam.zheng@bytedance.com, liangma@liangbit.com,
punit.agrawal@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [v3 4/4] mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:04:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230828210418.GD3290@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486CFF93-3BB1-44CD-B0A0-A47F560F2CAE@linux.dev>
On 08/28/23 19:33, Muchun Song wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 25, 2023, at 19:18, Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > The new boot flow when it comes to initialization of gigantic pages
> > is as follows:
> > - At boot time, for a gigantic page during __alloc_bootmem_hugepage,
> > the region after the first struct page is marked as noinit.
> > - This results in only the first struct page to be
> > initialized in reserve_bootmem_region. As the tail struct pages are
> > not initialized at this point, there can be a significant saving
> > in boot time if HVO succeeds later on.
> > - Later on in the boot, HVO is attempted. If its successful, only the first
> > HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page) - 1 tail struct pages
> > after the head struct page are initialized. If it is not successful,
> > then all of the tail struct pages are initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
>
> This edition is simpler than before ever, thanks for your work.
>
> There is premise that other subsystems do not access vmemmap pages
> before the initialization of vmemmap pages associated withe HugeTLB
> pages allocated from bootmem for your optimization. However, IIUC, the
> compacting path could access arbitrary struct page when memory fails
> to be allocated via buddy allocator. So we should make sure that
> those struct pages are not referenced in this routine. And I know
> if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, it will encounter
> the same issue, but I don't find any code to prevent this from
> happening. I need more time to confirm this, if someone already knows,
> please let me know, thanks. So I think HugeTLB should adopt the similar
> way to prevent this.
In this patch, the call to hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize() is moved BEFORE
__prep_new_hugetlb_folio or prep_new_hugetlb_folio in all code paths.
The prep_new_hugetlb_folio routine(s) are what set the destructor (soon
to be a flag) that identifies the set of pages as a hugetlb page. So,
there is now a window where a set of pages not identified as hugetlb
will not have vmemmap pages.
Recently, I closed the same window in the hugetlb freeing code paths with
commit 32c877191e02 'hugetlb: do not clear hugetlb dtor until allocating'.
This patch needs to be reworked so that this window is not opened in the
allocation paths.
--
Mike Kravetz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 11:18 [v3 0/4] mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO Usama Arif
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 1/4] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: Use nid of the head page to reallocate it Usama Arif
2023-08-28 7:15 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 18:25 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 2/4] memblock: pass memblock_type to memblock_setclr_flag Usama Arif
2023-08-28 7:16 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 7:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28 18:39 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 3/4] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT_VMEMMAP flag Usama Arif
2023-08-28 7:26 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 7:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28 8:52 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28 9:18 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 4/4] mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO Usama Arif
2023-08-28 11:33 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 21:04 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2023-08-29 3:33 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-29 3:47 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-30 10:27 ` [External] " Usama Arif
2023-08-31 6:21 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2023-08-31 9:58 ` Mel Gorman
2023-08-31 10:01 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-31 10:28 ` Mel Gorman
2023-08-31 7:33 ` [External] " Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230828210418.GD3290@monkey \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
--cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.