* [PATCH][master-next] qemu: fix segfault in MMU emulation
@ 2023-08-30 14:39 ross.burton
2023-08-31 7:30 ` [OE-core] " Alexandre Belloni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ross.burton @ 2023-08-30 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: nd
From: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Backport a patch that has been submitted to the qemu list that resolves
a crash in the softmmu code.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc | 1 +
meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
index 131162dd62f..ccde87d1901 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ SRC_URI = "https://download.qemu.org/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
file://0010-hw-pvrdma-Protect-against-buggy-or-malicious-guest-d.patch \
file://0002-linux-user-Replace-use-of-lfs64-related-functions-an.patch \
file://fixedmeson.patch \
+ file://softmmu.patch \
file://qemu-guest-agent.init \
file://qemu-guest-agent.udev \
"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bd28335b142
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+From 1960291925029e92dd340c64186f4bdb709805b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:13 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH 1/3] softmmu: Assert data in bounds in iotlb_to_section
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+Suggested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230826232415.80233-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org/]
+Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
+---
+ softmmu/physmem.c | 10 ++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
+index 3df73542e1..7597dc1c39 100644
+--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
++++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
+@@ -2413,9 +2413,15 @@ MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
+ int asidx = cpu_asidx_from_attrs(cpu, attrs);
+ CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
+ AddressSpaceDispatch *d = qatomic_rcu_read(&cpuas->memory_dispatch);
+- MemoryRegionSection *sections = d->map.sections;
++ int section_index = index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
++ MemoryRegionSection *ret;
++
++ assert(section_index < d->map.sections_nb);
++ ret = d->map.sections + section_index;
++ assert(ret->mr);
++ assert(ret->mr->ops);
+
+- return §ions[index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK];
++ return ret;
+ }
+
+ static void io_mem_init(void)
+--
+2.34.1
+
+
+From 94d2d2c85c04aab738daf56ec73915218fa05d82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:14 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH 2/3] softmmu: Use async_run_on_cpu in tcg_commit
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+After system startup, run the update to memory_dispatch
+and the tlb_flush on the cpu. This eliminates a race,
+wherein a running cpu sees the memory_dispatch change
+but has not yet seen the tlb_flush.
+
+Since the update now happens on the cpu, we need not use
+qatomic_rcu_read to protect the read of memory_dispatch.
+
+Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1826
+Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1834
+Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1846
+Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
+Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
+Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
+---
+ softmmu/physmem.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
+ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
+index 7597dc1c39..18277ddd67 100644
+--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
++++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
+@@ -680,8 +680,7 @@ address_space_translate_for_iotlb(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, hwaddr orig_addr,
+ IOMMUTLBEntry iotlb;
+ int iommu_idx;
+ hwaddr addr = orig_addr;
+- AddressSpaceDispatch *d =
+- qatomic_rcu_read(&cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch);
++ AddressSpaceDispatch *d = cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ section = address_space_translate_internal(d, addr, &addr, plen, false);
+@@ -2412,7 +2411,7 @@ MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
+ {
+ int asidx = cpu_asidx_from_attrs(cpu, attrs);
+ CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
+- AddressSpaceDispatch *d = qatomic_rcu_read(&cpuas->memory_dispatch);
++ AddressSpaceDispatch *d = cpuas->memory_dispatch;
+ int section_index = index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
+ MemoryRegionSection *ret;
+
+@@ -2487,23 +2486,42 @@ static void tcg_log_global_after_sync(MemoryListener *listener)
+ }
+ }
+
++static void tcg_commit_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_data data)
++{
++ CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = data.host_ptr;
++
++ cpuas->memory_dispatch = address_space_to_dispatch(cpuas->as);
++ tlb_flush(cpu);
++}
++
+ static void tcg_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
+ {
+ CPUAddressSpace *cpuas;
+- AddressSpaceDispatch *d;
++ CPUState *cpu;
+
+ assert(tcg_enabled());
+ /* since each CPU stores ram addresses in its TLB cache, we must
+ reset the modified entries */
+ cpuas = container_of(listener, CPUAddressSpace, tcg_as_listener);
+- cpu_reloading_memory_map();
+- /* The CPU and TLB are protected by the iothread lock.
+- * We reload the dispatch pointer now because cpu_reloading_memory_map()
+- * may have split the RCU critical section.
++ cpu = cpuas->cpu;
++
++ /*
++ * Defer changes to as->memory_dispatch until the cpu is quiescent.
++ * Otherwise we race between (1) other cpu threads and (2) ongoing
++ * i/o for the current cpu thread, with data cached by mmu_lookup().
++ *
++ * In addition, queueing the work function will kick the cpu back to
++ * the main loop, which will end the RCU critical section and reclaim
++ * the memory data structures.
++ *
++ * That said, the listener is also called during realize, before
++ * all of the tcg machinery for run-on is initialized: thus halt_cond.
+ */
+- d = address_space_to_dispatch(cpuas->as);
+- qatomic_rcu_set(&cpuas->memory_dispatch, d);
+- tlb_flush(cpuas->cpu);
++ if (cpu->halt_cond) {
++ async_run_on_cpu(cpu, tcg_commit_cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(cpuas));
++ } else {
++ tcg_commit_cpu(cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(cpuas));
++ }
+ }
+
+ static void memory_map_init(void)
+--
+2.34.1
+
+
+From 7f7cccdf465cb84acbe69f2f3d7cc8e6c3ebcfaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:15 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH 3/3] softmmu: Remove cpu_reloading_memory_map as unused
+
+Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
+---
+ accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c | 30 ------------------------------
+ include/exec/cpu-common.h | 1 -
+ 2 files changed, 31 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
+index 9a5fabf625..7e35d7f4b5 100644
+--- a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
++++ b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
+@@ -33,36 +33,6 @@ void cpu_loop_exit_noexc(CPUState *cpu)
+ cpu_loop_exit(cpu);
+ }
+
+-#if defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU)
+-void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void)
+-{
+- if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread() && current_cpu->running) {
+- /* The guest can in theory prolong the RCU critical section as long
+- * as it feels like. The major problem with this is that because it
+- * can do multiple reconfigurations of the memory map within the
+- * critical section, we could potentially accumulate an unbounded
+- * collection of memory data structures awaiting reclamation.
+- *
+- * Because the only thing we're currently protecting with RCU is the
+- * memory data structures, it's sufficient to break the critical section
+- * in this callback, which we know will get called every time the
+- * memory map is rearranged.
+- *
+- * (If we add anything else in the system that uses RCU to protect
+- * its data structures, we will need to implement some other mechanism
+- * to force TCG CPUs to exit the critical section, at which point this
+- * part of this callback might become unnecessary.)
+- *
+- * This pair matches cpu_exec's rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock(), which
+- * only protects cpu->as->dispatch. Since we know our caller is about
+- * to reload it, it's safe to split the critical section.
+- */
+- rcu_read_unlock();
+- rcu_read_lock();
+- }
+-}
+-#endif
+-
+ void cpu_loop_exit(CPUState *cpu)
+ {
+ /* Undo the setting in cpu_tb_exec. */
+diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
+index 87dc9a752c..41788c0bdd 100644
+--- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
++++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
+@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_write(hwaddr addr,
+ {
+ cpu_physical_memory_rw(addr, (void *)buf, len, true);
+ }
+-void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void);
+ void *cpu_physical_memory_map(hwaddr addr,
+ hwaddr *plen,
+ bool is_write);
+--
+2.34.1
+
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][master-next] qemu: fix segfault in MMU emulation
2023-08-30 14:39 [PATCH][master-next] qemu: fix segfault in MMU emulation ross.burton
@ 2023-08-31 7:30 ` Alexandre Belloni
2023-08-31 8:09 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2023-08-31 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ross Burton; +Cc: openembedded-core, nd
On 30/08/2023 15:39:56+0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> From: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
>
> Backport a patch that has been submitted to the qemu list that resolves
> a crash in the softmmu code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc | 1 +
> meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> index 131162dd62f..ccde87d1901 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ SRC_URI = "https://download.qemu.org/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
> file://0010-hw-pvrdma-Protect-against-buggy-or-malicious-guest-d.patch \
> file://0002-linux-user-Replace-use-of-lfs64-related-functions-an.patch \
> file://fixedmeson.patch \
> + file://softmmu.patch \
This doesn't apply cleanly on master, can you rebase?
> file://qemu-guest-agent.init \
> file://qemu-guest-agent.udev \
> "
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..bd28335b142
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
> +From 1960291925029e92dd340c64186f4bdb709805b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:13 -0700
> +Subject: [PATCH 1/3] softmmu: Assert data in bounds in iotlb_to_section
> +MIME-Version: 1.0
> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> +
> +Suggested-by: Alex Benn�e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> +Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +Acked-by: Alex Benn�e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230826232415.80233-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org/]
> +Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
> +---
> + softmmu/physmem.c | 10 ++++++++--
> + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> +index 3df73542e1..7597dc1c39 100644
> +--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> ++++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> +@@ -2413,9 +2413,15 @@ MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
> + int asidx = cpu_asidx_from_attrs(cpu, attrs);
> + CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
> + AddressSpaceDispatch *d = qatomic_rcu_read(&cpuas->memory_dispatch);
> +- MemoryRegionSection *sections = d->map.sections;
> ++ int section_index = index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
> ++ MemoryRegionSection *ret;
> ++
> ++ assert(section_index < d->map.sections_nb);
> ++ ret = d->map.sections + section_index;
> ++ assert(ret->mr);
> ++ assert(ret->mr->ops);
> +
> +- return §ions[index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK];
> ++ return ret;
> + }
> +
> + static void io_mem_init(void)
> +--
> +2.34.1
> +
> +
> +From 94d2d2c85c04aab738daf56ec73915218fa05d82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:14 -0700
> +Subject: [PATCH 2/3] softmmu: Use async_run_on_cpu in tcg_commit
> +MIME-Version: 1.0
> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> +
> +After system startup, run the update to memory_dispatch
> +and the tlb_flush on the cpu. This eliminates a race,
> +wherein a running cpu sees the memory_dispatch change
> +but has not yet seen the tlb_flush.
> +
> +Since the update now happens on the cpu, we need not use
> +qatomic_rcu_read to protect the read of memory_dispatch.
> +
> +Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1826
> +Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1834
> +Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1846
> +Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +Reviewed-by: Alex Benn�e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> +Tested-by: Alex Benn�e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> +Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> +---
> + softmmu/physmem.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> +index 7597dc1c39..18277ddd67 100644
> +--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> ++++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> +@@ -680,8 +680,7 @@ address_space_translate_for_iotlb(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, hwaddr orig_addr,
> + IOMMUTLBEntry iotlb;
> + int iommu_idx;
> + hwaddr addr = orig_addr;
> +- AddressSpaceDispatch *d =
> +- qatomic_rcu_read(&cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch);
> ++ AddressSpaceDispatch *d = cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + section = address_space_translate_internal(d, addr, &addr, plen, false);
> +@@ -2412,7 +2411,7 @@ MemoryRegionSection *iotlb_to_section(CPUState *cpu,
> + {
> + int asidx = cpu_asidx_from_attrs(cpu, attrs);
> + CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
> +- AddressSpaceDispatch *d = qatomic_rcu_read(&cpuas->memory_dispatch);
> ++ AddressSpaceDispatch *d = cpuas->memory_dispatch;
> + int section_index = index & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
> + MemoryRegionSection *ret;
> +
> +@@ -2487,23 +2486,42 @@ static void tcg_log_global_after_sync(MemoryListener *listener)
> + }
> + }
> +
> ++static void tcg_commit_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_data data)
> ++{
> ++ CPUAddressSpace *cpuas = data.host_ptr;
> ++
> ++ cpuas->memory_dispatch = address_space_to_dispatch(cpuas->as);
> ++ tlb_flush(cpu);
> ++}
> ++
> + static void tcg_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> + {
> + CPUAddressSpace *cpuas;
> +- AddressSpaceDispatch *d;
> ++ CPUState *cpu;
> +
> + assert(tcg_enabled());
> + /* since each CPU stores ram addresses in its TLB cache, we must
> + reset the modified entries */
> + cpuas = container_of(listener, CPUAddressSpace, tcg_as_listener);
> +- cpu_reloading_memory_map();
> +- /* The CPU and TLB are protected by the iothread lock.
> +- * We reload the dispatch pointer now because cpu_reloading_memory_map()
> +- * may have split the RCU critical section.
> ++ cpu = cpuas->cpu;
> ++
> ++ /*
> ++ * Defer changes to as->memory_dispatch until the cpu is quiescent.
> ++ * Otherwise we race between (1) other cpu threads and (2) ongoing
> ++ * i/o for the current cpu thread, with data cached by mmu_lookup().
> ++ *
> ++ * In addition, queueing the work function will kick the cpu back to
> ++ * the main loop, which will end the RCU critical section and reclaim
> ++ * the memory data structures.
> ++ *
> ++ * That said, the listener is also called during realize, before
> ++ * all of the tcg machinery for run-on is initialized: thus halt_cond.
> + */
> +- d = address_space_to_dispatch(cpuas->as);
> +- qatomic_rcu_set(&cpuas->memory_dispatch, d);
> +- tlb_flush(cpuas->cpu);
> ++ if (cpu->halt_cond) {
> ++ async_run_on_cpu(cpu, tcg_commit_cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(cpuas));
> ++ } else {
> ++ tcg_commit_cpu(cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(cpuas));
> ++ }
> + }
> +
> + static void memory_map_init(void)
> +--
> +2.34.1
> +
> +
> +From 7f7cccdf465cb84acbe69f2f3d7cc8e6c3ebcfaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:24:15 -0700
> +Subject: [PATCH 3/3] softmmu: Remove cpu_reloading_memory_map as unused
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> +---
> + accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c | 30 ------------------------------
> + include/exec/cpu-common.h | 1 -
> + 2 files changed, 31 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
> +index 9a5fabf625..7e35d7f4b5 100644
> +--- a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
> ++++ b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec-common.c
> +@@ -33,36 +33,6 @@ void cpu_loop_exit_noexc(CPUState *cpu)
> + cpu_loop_exit(cpu);
> + }
> +
> +-#if defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU)
> +-void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void)
> +-{
> +- if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread() && current_cpu->running) {
> +- /* The guest can in theory prolong the RCU critical section as long
> +- * as it feels like. The major problem with this is that because it
> +- * can do multiple reconfigurations of the memory map within the
> +- * critical section, we could potentially accumulate an unbounded
> +- * collection of memory data structures awaiting reclamation.
> +- *
> +- * Because the only thing we're currently protecting with RCU is the
> +- * memory data structures, it's sufficient to break the critical section
> +- * in this callback, which we know will get called every time the
> +- * memory map is rearranged.
> +- *
> +- * (If we add anything else in the system that uses RCU to protect
> +- * its data structures, we will need to implement some other mechanism
> +- * to force TCG CPUs to exit the critical section, at which point this
> +- * part of this callback might become unnecessary.)
> +- *
> +- * This pair matches cpu_exec's rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock(), which
> +- * only protects cpu->as->dispatch. Since we know our caller is about
> +- * to reload it, it's safe to split the critical section.
> +- */
> +- rcu_read_unlock();
> +- rcu_read_lock();
> +- }
> +-}
> +-#endif
> +-
> + void cpu_loop_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> + {
> + /* Undo the setting in cpu_tb_exec. */
> +diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> +index 87dc9a752c..41788c0bdd 100644
> +--- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> ++++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
> +@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_write(hwaddr addr,
> + {
> + cpu_physical_memory_rw(addr, (void *)buf, len, true);
> + }
> +-void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void);
> + void *cpu_physical_memory_map(hwaddr addr,
> + hwaddr *plen,
> + bool is_write);
> +--
> +2.34.1
> +
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#186894): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/186894
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101053465/3617179
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][master-next] qemu: fix segfault in MMU emulation
2023-08-31 7:30 ` [OE-core] " Alexandre Belloni
@ 2023-08-31 8:09 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2023-08-31 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alexandre.belloni, Ross Burton; +Cc: openembedded-core, nd
On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 09:30 +0200, Alexandre Belloni via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On 30/08/2023 15:39:56+0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > From: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
> >
> > Backport a patch that has been submitted to the qemu list that resolves
> > a crash in the softmmu code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc | 1 +
> > meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch | 216 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/softmmu.patch
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> > index 131162dd62f..ccde87d1901 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ SRC_URI = "https://download.qemu.org/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \
> > file://0010-hw-pvrdma-Protect-against-buggy-or-malicious-guest-d.patch \
> > file://0002-linux-user-Replace-use-of-lfs64-related-functions-an.patch \
> > file://fixedmeson.patch \
> > + file://softmmu.patch \
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly on master, can you rebase?
It applies against qemu 8.1.0 which is in master-next and whilst it
fixes the x86 issues 8.1.0 has, it breaks qemumips and qemumips64 :(
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-31 8:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-30 14:39 [PATCH][master-next] qemu: fix segfault in MMU emulation ross.burton
2023-08-31 7:30 ` [OE-core] " Alexandre Belloni
2023-08-31 8:09 ` Richard Purdie
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.