All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	<reinette.chatre@intel.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<gcherian@marvell.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<peternewman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/12] arm_mpam: Fix Downstream priority mask
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:32:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230901143233.0000480e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815152712.1760046-12-amitsinght@marvell.com>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:57:11 +0530
Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com> wrote:

> MPAMF_PRI_IDR_NS[DSPRI_WD] determines the number of implemented bits in
> the downstream priority field (MPAMCFG_PRI_NS). For instance, if the value
> of DSPRI_WD is 4, then the maximum value for dspri is 0xf, and mask should
> be GENMASK(3,0).
> 
> But with current implementation, it turned out to be GENMASK(4,0) .i.e.
> 0x1f instead of 0xf.
> 
> u16 dspri = GENMASK(rprops->dspri_wd, 0);
> 
> Let's fix it, by subtracting 1 from DSPRI_WD value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>

> ---
>  drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> index c0c83c04c77c..59022e42920c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static void mpam_reprogram_ris_partid(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris, u16 partid,
>  	struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->msc;
>  	u16 bwa_fract = MPAMCFG_MBW_MAX_MAX;
>  	struct mpam_props *rprops = &ris->props;
> -	u16 dspri = GENMASK(rprops->dspri_wd, 0);
> +	u16 dspri = GENMASK((rprops->dspri_wd-1), 0);

Spaces around the -

>  	u16 intpri = GENMASK(rprops->intpri_wd, 0);

Please fix intpri as well. Argument is the same.

I'm assuming / hoping James will squash this into relevant patch in his tree.

>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&msc->lock);


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	<reinette.chatre@intel.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<gcherian@marvell.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<peternewman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/12] arm_mpam: Fix Downstream priority mask
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:32:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230901143233.0000480e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815152712.1760046-12-amitsinght@marvell.com>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:57:11 +0530
Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com> wrote:

> MPAMF_PRI_IDR_NS[DSPRI_WD] determines the number of implemented bits in
> the downstream priority field (MPAMCFG_PRI_NS). For instance, if the value
> of DSPRI_WD is 4, then the maximum value for dspri is 0xf, and mask should
> be GENMASK(3,0).
> 
> But with current implementation, it turned out to be GENMASK(4,0) .i.e.
> 0x1f instead of 0xf.
> 
> u16 dspri = GENMASK(rprops->dspri_wd, 0);
> 
> Let's fix it, by subtracting 1 from DSPRI_WD value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>

> ---
>  drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> index c0c83c04c77c..59022e42920c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static void mpam_reprogram_ris_partid(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris, u16 partid,
>  	struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->msc;
>  	u16 bwa_fract = MPAMCFG_MBW_MAX_MAX;
>  	struct mpam_props *rprops = &ris->props;
> -	u16 dspri = GENMASK(rprops->dspri_wd, 0);
> +	u16 dspri = GENMASK((rprops->dspri_wd-1), 0);

Spaces around the -

>  	u16 intpri = GENMASK(rprops->intpri_wd, 0);

Please fix intpri as well. Argument is the same.

I'm assuming / hoping James will squash this into relevant patch in his tree.

>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&msc->lock);


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-01 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-15 15:27 [RFC 00/12] ARM: MPAM: add support for priority partitioning control Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 01/12] arm_mpam: Handle resource instances mapped to different controls Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-09-01 12:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 12:39     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 02/12] arm_mpam: resctrl: Detect priority partitioning capability Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-09-01 12:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 12:30     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 03/12] arm_mpam: resctrl: Define new schemata format for priority partition Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 04/12] fs/resctrl: Obtain CPBM upon priority partition presence Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 05/12] fs/resctrl: Set-up downstream priority partition resources Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-17 17:39   ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-17 17:39     ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 06/12] fs/resctrl: Extend schemata read for priority partition control Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-17 17:42   ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-17 17:42     ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 07/12] arm_mpam: resctrl: Retrieve priority values from arch code Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 08/12] fs/resctrl: Schemata write only for intended resource Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 09/12] fs/resctrl: Extend schemata write for priority partition control Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-17 17:27   ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-17 17:27     ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-17 17:53   ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-17 17:53     ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 10/12] arm_mpam: resctrl: Facilitate writing downstream priority value Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 11/12] arm_mpam: Fix Downstream priority mask Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-09-01 13:32   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-09-01 13:32     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-15 15:27 ` [RFC 12/12] arm_mpam: Program Downstream priority value Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-15 15:27   ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-09-01 13:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 13:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-17 19:11 ` [RFC 00/12] ARM: MPAM: add support for priority partitioning control Reinette Chatre
2023-08-17 19:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-17 20:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-17 20:29     ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-22 12:44   ` [EXT] " Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-22 12:44     ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-23 19:06     ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-23 19:06       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-23 21:33       ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-23 21:33         ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-23 22:20         ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-23 22:20           ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-23 22:36           ` Luck, Tony
2023-08-23 22:36             ` Luck, Tony
2023-08-24  8:52           ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-24  8:52             ` Amit Singh Tomar
2023-08-24 15:30             ` Luck, Tony
2023-08-24 15:30               ` Luck, Tony
2023-08-24 18:00             ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-24 18:00               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-11 20:56             ` Peter Newman
2024-01-11 20:56               ` Peter Newman
2024-01-11 21:40               ` Tony Luck
2024-01-11 21:40                 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-11 22:01                 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-11 22:01                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-11 23:14                   ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-11 23:14                     ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-11 23:31                     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-11 23:31                       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-22  9:01 ` Peter Newman
2023-08-22  9:01   ` Peter Newman
2023-09-01 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 14:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-01 15:04   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230901143233.0000480e@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.