From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:58:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905085832.2103-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230905085832.2103-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will
consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation
tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first
mutex locked in a sequence.
This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked and
its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will assume that memory
is freed with a held lock in there.
For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed
object lock last.
Related lock alloc tracking warning:
[ 322.660067] =========================
[ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed!
[ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N
[ 322.660078] -------------------------
[ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there!
[ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981:
[ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660135]
stack backtrace:
[ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155
[ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 322.660152] Call Trace:
[ 322.660155] <TASK>
[ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90
[ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0
[ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160
[ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290
[ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40
[ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140
[ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm]
[ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60
[ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100
[ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit]
[ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit]
[ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit]
[ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0
[ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[ 322.660358] </TASK>
[ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 2 +-
include/drm/drm_exec.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
index ff69cf0fb42a..5d2809de4517 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void drm_exec_unlock_all(struct drm_exec *exec)
struct drm_gem_object *obj;
unsigned long index;
- drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) {
+ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse(exec, index, obj) {
dma_resv_unlock(obj->resv);
drm_gem_object_put(obj);
}
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
index e0462361adf9..55764cf7c374 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
@@ -51,6 +51,20 @@ struct drm_exec {
struct drm_gem_object *prelocked;
};
+/**
+ * drm_exec_obj() - Return the object for a give drm_exec index
+ * @exec: Pointer to the drm_exec context
+ * @index: The index.
+ *
+ * Return: Pointer to the locked object corresponding to @index if
+ * index is within the number of locked objects. NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static inline struct drm_gem_object *
+drm_exec_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, unsigned long index)
+{
+ return index < exec->num_objects ? exec->objects[index] : NULL;
+}
+
/**
* drm_exec_for_each_locked_object - iterate over all the locked objects
* @exec: drm_exec object
@@ -59,10 +73,23 @@ struct drm_exec {
*
* Iterate over all the locked GEM objects inside the drm_exec object.
*/
-#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) \
- for (index = 0, obj = (exec)->objects[0]; \
- index < (exec)->num_objects; \
- ++index, obj = (exec)->objects[index])
+#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) \
+ for ((index) = 0; ((obj) = drm_exec_obj(exec, index)); ++(index))
+
+/**
+ * drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse - iterate over all the locked
+ * objects in reverse locking order
+ * @exec: drm_exec object
+ * @index: unsigned long index for the iteration
+ * @obj: the current GEM object
+ *
+ * Iterate over all the locked GEM objects inside the drm_exec object in
+ * reverse locking order. Note that @index may go below zero and wrap,
+ * but that will be caught by drm_exec_object(), returning a NULL object.
+ */
+#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse(exec, index, obj) \
+ for ((index) = (exec)->num_objects - 1; \
+ ((obj) = drm_exec_obj(exec, index)); --(index))
/**
* drm_exec_until_all_locked - loop until all GEM objects are locked
--
2.41.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:58:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905085832.2103-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230905085832.2103-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
If *any* object of a certain WW mutex class is locked, lockdep will
consider *all* mutexes of that class as locked. Also the lock allocation
tracking code will apparently register only the address of the first
mutex locked in a sequence.
This has the odd consequence that if that first mutex is unlocked and
its memory then freed, the lock alloc tracking code will assume that memory
is freed with a held lock in there.
For now, work around that for drm_exec by releasing the first grabbed
object lock last.
Related lock alloc tracking warning:
[ 322.660067] =========================
[ 322.660070] WARNING: held lock freed!
[ 322.660074] 6.5.0-rc7+ #155 Tainted: G U N
[ 322.660078] -------------------------
[ 322.660081] kunit_try_catch/4981 is freeing memory ffff888112adc000-ffff888112adc3ff, with a lock still held there!
[ 322.660089] ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660104] 2 locks held by kunit_try_catch/4981:
[ 322.660108] #0: ffffc9000343fe18 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: test_early_put+0x22f/0x490 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660123] #1: ffff888112adc1a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x11a/0x600 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660135]
stack backtrace:
[ 322.660139] CPU: 7 PID: 4981 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.5.0-rc7+ #155
[ 322.660146] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
[ 322.660152] Call Trace:
[ 322.660155] <TASK>
[ 322.660158] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90
[ 322.660164] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x20b/0x2b0
[ 322.660172] slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa1/0x160
[ 322.660179] ? drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660186] __kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x290
[ 322.660192] drm_exec_unlock_all+0x168/0x2a0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660200] drm_exec_fini+0xf/0x1c0 [drm_exec]
[ 322.660206] test_early_put+0x289/0x490 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660215] ? __pfx_test_early_put+0x10/0x10 [drm_exec_test]
[ 322.660222] ? __kasan_check_byte+0xf/0x40
[ 322.660227] ? __ksize+0x63/0x140
[ 322.660233] ? drmm_add_final_kfree+0x3e/0xa0 [drm]
[ 322.660289] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60
[ 322.660294] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100
[ 322.660301] ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 [kunit]
[ 322.660310] ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 [kunit]
[ 322.660319] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [kunit]
[ 322.660328] kthread+0x2e7/0x3c0
[ 322.660334] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 322.660339] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[ 322.660345] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 322.660349] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[ 322.660358] </TASK>
[ 322.660818] ok 8 test_early_put
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 2 +-
include/drm/drm_exec.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
index ff69cf0fb42a..5d2809de4517 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void drm_exec_unlock_all(struct drm_exec *exec)
struct drm_gem_object *obj;
unsigned long index;
- drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) {
+ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse(exec, index, obj) {
dma_resv_unlock(obj->resv);
drm_gem_object_put(obj);
}
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
index e0462361adf9..55764cf7c374 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
@@ -51,6 +51,20 @@ struct drm_exec {
struct drm_gem_object *prelocked;
};
+/**
+ * drm_exec_obj() - Return the object for a give drm_exec index
+ * @exec: Pointer to the drm_exec context
+ * @index: The index.
+ *
+ * Return: Pointer to the locked object corresponding to @index if
+ * index is within the number of locked objects. NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static inline struct drm_gem_object *
+drm_exec_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, unsigned long index)
+{
+ return index < exec->num_objects ? exec->objects[index] : NULL;
+}
+
/**
* drm_exec_for_each_locked_object - iterate over all the locked objects
* @exec: drm_exec object
@@ -59,10 +73,23 @@ struct drm_exec {
*
* Iterate over all the locked GEM objects inside the drm_exec object.
*/
-#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) \
- for (index = 0, obj = (exec)->objects[0]; \
- index < (exec)->num_objects; \
- ++index, obj = (exec)->objects[index])
+#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) \
+ for ((index) = 0; ((obj) = drm_exec_obj(exec, index)); ++(index))
+
+/**
+ * drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse - iterate over all the locked
+ * objects in reverse locking order
+ * @exec: drm_exec object
+ * @index: unsigned long index for the iteration
+ * @obj: the current GEM object
+ *
+ * Iterate over all the locked GEM objects inside the drm_exec object in
+ * reverse locking order. Note that @index may go below zero and wrap,
+ * but that will be caught by drm_exec_object(), returning a NULL object.
+ */
+#define drm_exec_for_each_locked_object_reverse(exec, index, obj) \
+ for ((index) = (exec)->num_objects - 1; \
+ ((obj) = drm_exec_obj(exec, index)); --(index))
/**
* drm_exec_until_all_locked - loop until all GEM objects are locked
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-05 8:58 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/drm_exec, drm/drm_kunit: Fix / WA for uaf and lock alloc tracking Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 8:58 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 8:58 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/kunit: Avoid a driver uaf Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 8:58 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 12:06 ` [Intel-xe] " Maxime Ripard
2023-09-05 12:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-05 12:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 12:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-06 10:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-06 10:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-07 10:32 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-07 10:32 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 8:58 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/tests/drm_exec: Add a test for object freeing within drm_exec_fini() Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 8:58 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 12:05 ` [Intel-xe] " Maxime Ripard
2023-09-05 12:32 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 13:16 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-05 13:42 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-06 10:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-06 10:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-05 8:58 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2023-09-05 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/drm_exec: Work around a WW mutex lockdep oddity Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 9:22 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-05 9:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-05 10:59 ` [Intel-xe] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-05 10:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-05 13:14 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-05 13:14 ` Christian König
2023-09-05 14:29 ` [Intel-xe] " Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 14:29 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-06 8:34 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-06 8:34 ` Christian König
2023-09-07 8:59 ` [Intel-xe] " Thomas Hellström
2023-09-07 8:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-09-05 9:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/drm_exec, drm/drm_kunit: Fix / WA for uaf and lock alloc tracking Patchwork
2023-09-05 9:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-05 9:03 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-09-05 9:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-05 9:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-05 9:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-07 14:52 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/drm_exec, drm/drm_kunit: Fix / WA for uaf and lock alloc tracking. (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230905085832.2103-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.