All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* + selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-09-05 16:02 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-09-05 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, vbabka, torvalds, surenb, shuah, paulmck, mhocko,
	lstoakes, lokeshgidra, Liam.Howlett, kirill, kaleshsingh, joel,
	akpm


The patch titled
     Subject: selftests: mm: add a test for remapping within a range
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: selftests: mm: add a test for remapping within a range
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 15:13:27 +0000

Move a block of memory within a memory range.  Any alignment optimization
on the source address may cause corruption.  Verify using kselftest that
it works.  I have also verified with tracing that such optimization does
not happen due to this check in can_align_down():

if (!for_stack && vma->vm_start != addr_to_align)
	return false;

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230903151328.2981432-7-joel@joelfernandes.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c~selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #define VALIDATION_NO_THRESHOLD 0	/* Verify the entire region */
 
 #define MIN(X, Y) ((X) < (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
+#define SIZE_MB(m) ((size_t)m * (1024 * 1024))
 
 struct config {
 	unsigned long long src_alignment;
@@ -227,6 +228,79 @@ out:
 }
 
 /*
+ * Verify that an mremap within a range does not cause corruption
+ * of unrelated part of range.
+ *
+ * Consider the following range which is 2MB aligned and is
+ * a part of a larger 20MB range which is not shown. Each
+ * character is 256KB below making the source and destination
+ * 2MB each. The lower case letters are moved (s to d) and the
+ * upper case letters are not moved. The below test verifies
+ * that the upper case S letters are not corrupted by the
+ * adjacent mremap.
+ *
+ * |DDDDddddSSSSssss|
+ */
+static void mremap_move_within_range(char pattern_seed)
+{
+	char *test_name = "mremap mremap move within range";
+	void *src, *dest;
+	int i, success = 1;
+
+	size_t size = SIZE_MB(20);
+	void *ptr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+			 MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+	if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
+		perror("mmap");
+		success = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	memset(ptr, 0, size);
+
+	src = ptr + SIZE_MB(6);
+	src = (void *)((unsigned long)src & ~(SIZE_MB(2) - 1));
+
+	/* Set byte pattern for source block. */
+	srand(pattern_seed);
+	for (i = 0; i < SIZE_MB(2); i++) {
+		((char *)src)[i] = (char) rand();
+	}
+
+	dest = src - SIZE_MB(2);
+
+	void *new_ptr = mremap(src + SIZE_MB(1), SIZE_MB(1), SIZE_MB(1),
+						   MREMAP_MAYMOVE | MREMAP_FIXED, dest + SIZE_MB(1));
+	if (new_ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
+		perror("mremap");
+		success = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Verify byte pattern after remapping */
+	srand(pattern_seed);
+	for (i = 0; i < SIZE_MB(1); i++) {
+		char c = (char) rand();
+
+		if (((char *)src)[i] != c) {
+			ksft_print_msg("Data at src at %d got corrupted due to unrelated mremap\n",
+				       i);
+			ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", c & 0xff,
+					((char *) src)[i] & 0xff);
+			success = 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+out:
+	if (munmap(ptr, size) == -1)
+		perror("munmap");
+
+	if (success)
+		ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", test_name);
+	else
+		ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", test_name);
+}
+
+/*
  * Returns the start address of the mapping on success, else returns
  * NULL on failure.
  */
@@ -491,6 +565,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	unsigned int threshold_mb = VALIDATION_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD;
 	unsigned int pattern_seed;
 	int num_expand_tests = 2;
+	int num_misc_tests = 1;
 	struct test test_cases[MAX_TEST] = {};
 	struct test perf_test_cases[MAX_PERF_TEST];
 	int page_size;
@@ -572,7 +647,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 				(threshold_mb * _1MB >= _1GB);
 
 	ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases) + (run_perf_tests ?
-		      ARRAY_SIZE(perf_test_cases) : 0) + num_expand_tests);
+		      ARRAY_SIZE(perf_test_cases) : 0) + num_expand_tests + num_misc_tests);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); i++)
 		run_mremap_test_case(test_cases[i], &failures, threshold_mb,
@@ -590,6 +665,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	fclose(maps_fp);
 
+	mremap_move_within_range(pattern_seed);
+
 	if (run_perf_tests) {
 		ksft_print_msg("\n%s\n",
 		 "mremap HAVE_MOVE_PMD/PUD optimization time comparison for 1GB region:");
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from joel@joelfernandes.org are

mm-vmalloc-add-a-safer-version-of-find_vm_area-for-debug.patch
mm-mremap-optimize-the-start-addresses-in-move_page_tables.patch
mm-mremap-allow-moves-within-the-same-vma-for-stack-moves.patch
selftests-mm-fix-failure-case-when-new-remap-region-was-not-found.patch
selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-mutually-aligned-moves-pmd-size.patch
selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-to-area-immediately-after-existing-mapping.patch
selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range.patch
selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-moving-from-an-offset-from-start-of-mapping.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-05 16:02 + selftests-mm-add-a-test-for-remapping-within-a-range.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.