From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Janne Grunau via B4 Relay <devnull+j.jannau.net@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
asahi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:33:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-v1-1-f8718aefc685@jannau.net>
Hi Janne,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 15d30b46573d75f5cb58cfacded8ebab9c76a2b0]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janne-Grunau-via-B4-Relay/drm-simpledrm-Add-support-for-multiple-power-domains/20230911-004026
base: 15d30b46573d75f5cb58cfacded8ebab9c76a2b0
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-v1-1-f8718aefc685%40jannau.net
patch subject: [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"
config: arm64-randconfig-r003-20230912 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c:506:24: warning: flag ' ' results in undefined behavior with 'p' conversion specifier [-Wformat]
506 | drm_err(&sdev->dev, "% power-domains count:%d\n", __func__, sdev->pwr_dom_count);
| ~^~
include/drm/drm_print.h:469:39: note: expanded from macro 'drm_err'
469 | __drm_printk((drm), err,, "*ERROR* " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/drm/drm_print.h:456:41: note: expanded from macro '__drm_printk'
456 | dev_##level##type((drm)->dev, "[drm] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:144:57: note: expanded from macro 'dev_err'
144 | dev_printk_index_wrap(_dev_err, KERN_ERR, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:19:22: note: expanded from macro 'dev_fmt'
19 | #define dev_fmt(fmt) fmt
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:16: note: expanded from macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
1 warning generated.
vim +506 drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
477
478 #if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
479 /*
480 * Generic power domain handling code.
481 *
482 * Here we handle the power-domains properties of our "simple-framebuffer"
483 * dt node. This is only necessary if there is more than one power-domain.
484 * A single power-domains is handled automatically by the driver core. Multiple
485 * power-domains have to be handled by drivers since the driver core can't know
486 * the correct power sequencing. Power sequencing is not an issue for simpledrm
487 * since the bootloader has put the power domains already in the correct state.
488 * simpledrm has only to ensure they remain active for its lifetime.
489 *
490 * When the driver unloads, we detach from the power-domains.
491 *
492 * We only complain about errors here, no action is taken as the most likely
493 * error can only happen due to a mismatch between the bootloader which set
494 * up the "simple-framebuffer" dt node, and the PM domain providers in the
495 * device tree. Chances are that there are no adverse effects, and if there are,
496 * a clean teardown of the fb probe will not help us much either. So just
497 * complain and carry on, and hope that the user actually gets a working fb at
498 * the end of things.
499 */
500 static void simpledrm_device_detach_genpd(void *res)
501 {
502 int i;
503 struct simpledrm_device *sdev = /*(struct simpledrm_device *)*/res;
504
505
> 506 drm_err(&sdev->dev, "% power-domains count:%d\n", __func__, sdev->pwr_dom_count);
507 if (sdev->pwr_dom_count <= 1)
508 return;
509
510 for (i = sdev->pwr_dom_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
511 if (!sdev->pwr_dom_links[i])
512 device_link_del(sdev->pwr_dom_links[i]);
513 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i]))
514 dev_pm_domain_detach(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i], true);
515 }
516 }
517
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Janne Grunau via B4 Relay <devnull+j.jannau.net@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: asahi@lists.linux.dev, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:33:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-v1-1-f8718aefc685@jannau.net>
Hi Janne,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 15d30b46573d75f5cb58cfacded8ebab9c76a2b0]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Janne-Grunau-via-B4-Relay/drm-simpledrm-Add-support-for-multiple-power-domains/20230911-004026
base: 15d30b46573d75f5cb58cfacded8ebab9c76a2b0
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910-simpledrm-multiple-power-domains-v1-1-f8718aefc685%40jannau.net
patch subject: [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains"
config: arm64-randconfig-r003-20230912 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230912/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c:506:24: warning: flag ' ' results in undefined behavior with 'p' conversion specifier [-Wformat]
506 | drm_err(&sdev->dev, "% power-domains count:%d\n", __func__, sdev->pwr_dom_count);
| ~^~
include/drm/drm_print.h:469:39: note: expanded from macro 'drm_err'
469 | __drm_printk((drm), err,, "*ERROR* " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/drm/drm_print.h:456:41: note: expanded from macro '__drm_printk'
456 | dev_##level##type((drm)->dev, "[drm] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:144:57: note: expanded from macro 'dev_err'
144 | dev_printk_index_wrap(_dev_err, KERN_ERR, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:19:22: note: expanded from macro 'dev_fmt'
19 | #define dev_fmt(fmt) fmt
| ^~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:16: note: expanded from macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
1 warning generated.
vim +506 drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
477
478 #if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
479 /*
480 * Generic power domain handling code.
481 *
482 * Here we handle the power-domains properties of our "simple-framebuffer"
483 * dt node. This is only necessary if there is more than one power-domain.
484 * A single power-domains is handled automatically by the driver core. Multiple
485 * power-domains have to be handled by drivers since the driver core can't know
486 * the correct power sequencing. Power sequencing is not an issue for simpledrm
487 * since the bootloader has put the power domains already in the correct state.
488 * simpledrm has only to ensure they remain active for its lifetime.
489 *
490 * When the driver unloads, we detach from the power-domains.
491 *
492 * We only complain about errors here, no action is taken as the most likely
493 * error can only happen due to a mismatch between the bootloader which set
494 * up the "simple-framebuffer" dt node, and the PM domain providers in the
495 * device tree. Chances are that there are no adverse effects, and if there are,
496 * a clean teardown of the fb probe will not help us much either. So just
497 * complain and carry on, and hope that the user actually gets a working fb at
498 * the end of things.
499 */
500 static void simpledrm_device_detach_genpd(void *res)
501 {
502 int i;
503 struct simpledrm_device *sdev = /*(struct simpledrm_device *)*/res;
504
505
> 506 drm_err(&sdev->dev, "% power-domains count:%d\n", __func__, sdev->pwr_dom_count);
507 if (sdev->pwr_dom_count <= 1)
508 return;
509
510 for (i = sdev->pwr_dom_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
511 if (!sdev->pwr_dom_links[i])
512 device_link_del(sdev->pwr_dom_links[i]);
513 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i]))
514 dev_pm_domain_detach(sdev->pwr_dom_devs[i], true);
515 }
516 }
517
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-10 16:39 [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Add support for multiple "power-domains" Janne Grunau via B4 Relay
2023-09-10 16:39 ` Janne Grunau via B4 Relay
2023-09-10 16:39 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-10 18:28 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-10 18:28 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-10 18:58 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-10 18:58 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-10 20:16 ` Christophe JAILLET
2023-09-10 20:16 ` Christophe JAILLET
2023-09-12 6:44 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-12 6:44 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-11 12:26 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-09-11 14:43 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-12 6:47 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-12 6:47 ` Janne Grunau
2023-09-12 14:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-09-12 14:33 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309122212.MetCn4UK-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devnull+j.jannau.net@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.