From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, mcanal@igalia.com,
sarah.walker@imgtec.com, ketil.johnsen@arm.com,
lina@asahilina.net, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
boris.brezillon@collabora.com, donald.robson@imgtec.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:30:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi Matthew,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.6-rc1 next-20230913]
[cannot apply to drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/drm-sched-Add-drm_sched_submit_-helpers/20230912-102001
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm drm-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230913/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> Documentation/gpu/drm-mm:552: ./drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:52: WARNING: Enumerated list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, robdclark@chromium.org,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
sarah.walker@imgtec.com, ketil.johnsen@arm.com,
mcanal@igalia.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
lina@asahilina.net, donald.robson@imgtec.com,
boris.brezillon@collabora.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:30:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi Matthew,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.6-rc1 next-20230913]
[cannot apply to drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/drm-sched-Add-drm_sched_submit_-helpers/20230912-102001
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm drm-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230913/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> Documentation/gpu/drm-mm:552: ./drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:52: WARNING: Enumerated list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com,
mcanal@igalia.com, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
ketil.johnsen@arm.com, lina@asahilina.net,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
luben.tuikov@amd.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
donald.robson@imgtec.com, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
christian.koenig@amd.com, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 20:30:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi Matthew,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.6-rc1 next-20230913]
[cannot apply to drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/drm-sched-Add-drm_sched_submit_-helpers/20230912-102001
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm drm-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912021615.2086698-5-matthew.brost%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230913/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> Documentation/gpu/drm-mm:552: ./drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:52: WARNING: Enumerated list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 2:16 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_submit_* helpers Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 7:29 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:02 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 15:02 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 3:41 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 3:41 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 3:35 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 3:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 17:07 ` [Intel-xe] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-16 17:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler / entity Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 7:37 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 7:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 15:14 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 15:14 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:11 ` [Intel-xe] " kernel test robot
2023-09-12 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 15:17 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 15:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 15:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 4:18 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 4:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 4:23 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 4:23 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 15:48 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 15:48 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 15:49 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 15:49 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 12:30 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-09-13 12:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-13 12:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:08 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 8:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:37 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:37 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:53 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:55 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:55 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/sched: Add generic scheduler message interface Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:23 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 8:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:50 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:50 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/sched: Start run wq before TDR in drm_sched_start Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/sched: Submit job before starting TDR Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 2:56 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 2:56 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 17:48 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 17:48 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-21 3:35 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-21 3:35 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/sched: Add helper to set TDR timeout Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 2:38 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 2:38 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 17:36 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-14 17:36 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/sched: Waiting for pending jobs to complete in scheduler kill Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 8:44 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 8:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 9:57 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-12 9:57 ` Christian König
2023-09-12 14:47 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:47 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-16 17:52 ` [Intel-xe] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-16 17:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-18 11:03 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-18 11:03 ` Christian König
2023-09-18 14:57 ` [Intel-xe] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-18 14:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-19 5:55 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-19 5:55 ` Christian König
2023-09-12 10:28 ` [Intel-xe] " Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 10:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-09-12 14:54 ` [Intel-xe] " Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 14:54 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/sched/doc: Add Entity teardown documentaion Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-13 15:04 ` [Intel-xe] " Christian König
2023-09-13 15:04 ` Christian König
2023-09-14 2:06 ` [Intel-xe] " Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 2:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-09-16 18:06 ` [Intel-xe] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-16 18:06 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-09-12 2:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/sched: Update maintainers of GPU scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-09-12 2:20 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev5) Patchwork
2023-09-14 1:45 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/13] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Luben Tuikov
2023-09-14 1:45 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309132041.76l2uKon-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.