From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function.
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:59:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920155923.151136-2-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920155923.151136-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Move most of code to bpf_struct_ops_init_one() that can be use to
initialize new struct_ops types registered dynamically.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index db6176fb64dc..627cf1ea840a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -110,102 +110,111 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_struct_ops_prog_ops = {
static const struct btf_type *module_type;
-void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
+static void bpf_struct_ops_init_one(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops,
+ struct btf *btf,
+ struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
{
- s32 type_id, value_id, module_id;
const struct btf_member *member;
- struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
const struct btf_type *t;
+ s32 type_id, value_id;
char value_name[128];
const char *mname;
- u32 i, j;
+ int i;
- /* Ensure BTF type is emitted for "struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name" */
-#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE(_name) BTF_TYPE_EMIT(struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name);
-#include "bpf_struct_ops_types.h"
-#undef BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE
+ if (strlen(st_ops->name) + VALUE_PREFIX_LEN >=
+ sizeof(value_name)) {
+ pr_warn("struct_ops name %s is too long\n",
+ st_ops->name);
+ return;
+ }
+ sprintf(value_name, "%s%s", VALUE_PREFIX, st_ops->name);
- module_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, "module", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
- if (module_id < 0) {
- pr_warn("Cannot find struct module in btf_vmlinux\n");
+ value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
+ BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (value_id < 0) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
+ value_name);
return;
}
- module_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, module_id);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_struct_ops); i++) {
- st_ops = bpf_struct_ops[i];
+ type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, st_ops->name,
+ BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (type_id < 0) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
+ st_ops->name);
+ return;
+ }
+ t = btf_type_by_id(btf, type_id);
+ if (btf_type_vlen(t) > BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot support #%u members in struct %s\n",
+ btf_type_vlen(t), st_ops->name);
+ return;
+ }
- if (strlen(st_ops->name) + VALUE_PREFIX_LEN >=
- sizeof(value_name)) {
- pr_warn("struct_ops name %s is too long\n",
+ for_each_member(i, t, member) {
+ const struct btf_type *func_proto;
+
+ mname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, member->name_off);
+ if (!*mname) {
+ pr_warn("anon member in struct %s is not supported\n",
st_ops->name);
- continue;
+ break;
}
- sprintf(value_name, "%s%s", VALUE_PREFIX, st_ops->name);
- value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
- BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
- if (value_id < 0) {
- pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
- value_name);
- continue;
+ if (__btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member)) {
+ pr_warn("bit field member %s in struct %s is not supported\n",
+ mname, st_ops->name);
+ break;
}
- type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, st_ops->name,
- BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
- if (type_id < 0) {
- pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in btf_vmlinux\n",
- st_ops->name);
- continue;
- }
- t = btf_type_by_id(btf, type_id);
- if (btf_type_vlen(t) > BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS) {
- pr_warn("Cannot support #%u members in struct %s\n",
- btf_type_vlen(t), st_ops->name);
- continue;
+ func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf,
+ member->type,
+ NULL);
+ if (func_proto &&
+ btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
+ func_proto, mname,
+ &st_ops->func_models[i])) {
+ pr_warn("Error in parsing func ptr %s in struct %s\n",
+ mname, st_ops->name);
+ break;
}
+ }
- for_each_member(j, t, member) {
- const struct btf_type *func_proto;
+ if (i == btf_type_vlen(t)) {
+ if (st_ops->init(btf)) {
+ pr_warn("Error in init bpf_struct_ops %s\n",
+ st_ops->name);
+ } else {
+ st_ops->type_id = type_id;
+ st_ops->type = t;
+ st_ops->value_id = value_id;
+ st_ops->value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf,
+ value_id);
+ }
+ }
+}
- mname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, member->name_off);
- if (!*mname) {
- pr_warn("anon member in struct %s is not supported\n",
- st_ops->name);
- break;
- }
+void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
+{
+ struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
+ s32 module_id;
+ u32 i;
- if (__btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member)) {
- pr_warn("bit field member %s in struct %s is not supported\n",
- mname, st_ops->name);
- break;
- }
+ /* Ensure BTF type is emitted for "struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name" */
+#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE(_name) BTF_TYPE_EMIT(struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name);
+#include "bpf_struct_ops_types.h"
+#undef BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE
- func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf,
- member->type,
- NULL);
- if (func_proto &&
- btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
- func_proto, mname,
- &st_ops->func_models[j])) {
- pr_warn("Error in parsing func ptr %s in struct %s\n",
- mname, st_ops->name);
- break;
- }
- }
+ module_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, "module", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (module_id < 0) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot find struct module in btf_vmlinux\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ module_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, module_id);
- if (j == btf_type_vlen(t)) {
- if (st_ops->init(btf)) {
- pr_warn("Error in init bpf_struct_ops %s\n",
- st_ops->name);
- } else {
- st_ops->type_id = type_id;
- st_ops->type = t;
- st_ops->value_id = value_id;
- st_ops->value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf,
- value_id);
- }
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_struct_ops); i++) {
+ st_ops = bpf_struct_ops[i];
+ bpf_struct_ops_init_one(st_ops, btf, log);
}
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 15:59 [RFC bpf-next v3 00/11] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-09-20 15:59 ` thinker.li [this message]
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-09-25 21:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 21:45 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: add register and unregister functions for struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:07 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:13 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-25 23:31 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26 0:19 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: attach a module BTF to a bpf_struct_ops thinker.li
2023-09-25 22:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:25 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-25 23:42 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-09-26 1:03 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-27 20:27 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 07/11] bpf, net: switch to storing struct_ops in btf thinker.li
2023-09-20 23:45 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-24 3:23 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-25 8:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26 0:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26 0:18 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 08/11] bpf: pass attached BTF to find correct type info of struct_ops progs thinker.li
2023-09-25 22:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-25 23:50 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-26 0:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26 0:58 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 09/11] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-09-25 23:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-26 0:12 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 10/11] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-09-20 15:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-09-26 1:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-09-26 1:33 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 00/11] Registrating struct_ops types from modules Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920155923.151136-2-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.