From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
heiko@sntech.de, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] iommu: Improve map/unmap sanity checks
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:28:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922172831.GA145934@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fef0b304-5a19-b2a3-c399-7f21c05623bf@arm.com>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 01:18:31PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > This is not a theoretical question - does any in-kernel code actually
> > do that and expect it to work? I didn't notice any..
>
> I was hoping to have to say I'd only seen it in unmerged (e.g. [1]) and
> downstream code, but then I found drivers/net/ipa/ :(
Aiiie, what is that doing? Mapping something into the dma-api owned
domain!?!
See this is why I think stronger invarients are a good idea, we can't
police the entire kernel but we can make the entry points explode if
someone is doing something WRONG.
> All that said, I don't mind if you want to propose a separate patch to turn
> certain external caller conditions into noisy warnings, but I wouldn't want
> to tie it up with any other changes which would risk getting caught in the
> crossfire if someone does then hit a newly-introduced warning and start
> arguing to revert it. And I'm not going to do so in any of my patches since
> as above I don't personally believe it's a valuable thing to do.
Ok, that make sense
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
heiko@sntech.de, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] iommu: Improve map/unmap sanity checks
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:28:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922172831.GA145934@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fef0b304-5a19-b2a3-c399-7f21c05623bf@arm.com>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 01:18:31PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > This is not a theoretical question - does any in-kernel code actually
> > do that and expect it to work? I didn't notice any..
>
> I was hoping to have to say I'd only seen it in unmerged (e.g. [1]) and
> downstream code, but then I found drivers/net/ipa/ :(
Aiiie, what is that doing? Mapping something into the dma-api owned
domain!?!
See this is why I think stronger invarients are a good idea, we can't
police the entire kernel but we can make the entry points explode if
someone is doing something WRONG.
> All that said, I don't mind if you want to propose a separate patch to turn
> certain external caller conditions into noisy warnings, but I wouldn't want
> to tie it up with any other changes which would risk getting caught in the
> crossfire if someone does then hit a newly-introduced warning and start
> arguing to revert it. And I'm not going to do so in any of my patches since
> as above I don't personally believe it's a valuable thing to do.
Ok, that make sense
Jason
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 16:18 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: Clean up map/unmap ops Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu/exynos: Update to {map,unmap}_pages Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu/omap: " Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/rockchip: " Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/sun50i: " Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/tegra-gart: " Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/tegra-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu: Retire map/unmap ops Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-13 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu: Improve map/unmap sanity checks Robin Murphy
2023-09-12 16:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-13 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 18:46 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-13 18:46 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-14 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-14 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-14 14:23 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-14 14:23 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-14 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-14 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-19 12:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-19 12:18 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-22 17:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-09-22 17:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-25 10:05 ` [PATCH 0/8] iommu: Clean up map/unmap ops Joerg Roedel
2023-09-25 10:05 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-09-25 15:33 ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-09-25 15:33 ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-09-26 9:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-09-26 9:23 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-09-26 12:01 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-26 12:01 ` Robin Murphy
2023-09-26 14:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-09-26 14:57 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230922172831.GA145934@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.