All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, paul@paul-moore.com,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, song@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	ast@kernel.org, renauld@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 13:40:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309301339.8196ECC78@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202309302332.1mxVwb0U-lkp@intel.com>

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 12:13:06AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi KP,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
> [also build test ERROR on bpf/master pcmoore-selinux/next linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/KP-Singh/kernel-Add-helper-macros-for-loop-unrolling/20230929-042610
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928202410.3765062-4-kpsingh%40kernel.org
> patch subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls
> config: i386-randconfig-001-20230930 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309302332.1mxVwb0U-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230930/202309302332.1mxVwb0U-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309302332.1mxVwb0U-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> security/security.c:139:1: error: Only string constants are supported as initializers for randomized structures with flexible arrays
>      139 | };
>          | ^

Uuh, where is there a flexible array here?

> vim +139 security/security.c
> 
>    118	
>    119	/*
>    120	 * Initialise a table of static calls for each LSM hook.
>    121	 * DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL invocation above generates a key (STATIC_CALL_KEY)
>    122	 * and a trampoline (STATIC_CALL_TRAMP) which are used to call
>    123	 * __static_call_update when updating the static call.
>    124	 */
>    125	struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init = {
>    126	#define INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL(NUM, NAME)					\
>    127		(struct lsm_static_call) {					\
>    128			.key = &STATIC_CALL_KEY(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM)),	\
>    129			.trampoline = LSM_HOOK_TRAMP(NAME, NUM),		\
>    130			.active = &SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(NAME, NUM),		\
>    131		},
>    132	#define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...)				\
>    133		.NAME = {							\
>    134			LSM_DEFINE_UNROLL(INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL, NAME)		\
>    135		},
>    136	#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
>    137	#undef LSM_HOOK
>    138	#undef INIT_LSM_STATIC_CALL
>  > 139	};
>    140	

*confused*

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-30 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 20:24 [PATCH v5 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls KP Singh
2023-09-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling KP Singh
2023-09-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] security: Count the LSMs enabled at compile time KP Singh
2023-09-29  0:37   ` Kees Cook
2023-09-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls KP Singh
2023-09-30 16:13   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-30 20:40     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-10-04  0:09       ` KP Singh
2023-09-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] bpf: Only enable BPF LSM hooks when an LSM program is attached KP Singh
2023-10-05  8:09   ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-05 13:26     ` KP Singh
2023-10-05 13:27       ` KP Singh
2023-10-05 13:52         ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-05 16:07           ` KP Singh
2023-10-06  7:27             ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-06  9:05               ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-06 10:57                 ` KP Singh
2023-10-06 18:32                   ` KP Singh
2023-09-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] security: Add CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY KP Singh
2023-09-29  0:38   ` Kees Cook
2023-09-29  0:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls Kees Cook
2023-10-02 11:06 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-10-02 11:09   ` KP Singh
2023-10-02 13:27     ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202309301339.8196ECC78@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=renauld@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.