From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
<peter.maydell@linaro.org>, <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
<imammedo@redhat.com>, <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
<david@redhat.com>, <philmd@linaro.org>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
<oliver.upton@linux.dev>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mst@redhat.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <gshan@redhat.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<alex.bennee@linaro.org>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<darren@os.amperecomputing.com>, <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>, <karl.heubaum@oracle.com>,
<miguel.luis@oracle.com>, <salil.mehta@opnsrc.net>,
<zhukeqian1@huawei.com>, <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>,
<wangyanan55@huawei.com>, <jiakernel2@gmail.com>,
<maobibo@loongson.cn>, <lixianglai@loongson.cn>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 16:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002165322.00003a2e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230930001933.2660-2-salil.mehta@huawei.com>
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 01:19:24 +0100
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> wrote:
> KVM vCPU creation is done once during the initialization of the VM when Qemu
> threads are spawned. This is common to all the architectures.
>
> Hot-unplug of vCPU results in destruction of the vCPU objects in QOM but
> the KVM vCPU objects in the Host KVM are not destroyed and their representative
> KVM vCPU objects/context in Qemu are parked.
>
> Refactor common logic so that some APIs could be reused by vCPU Hotplug code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Hi Salil,
A few trivial things inline, plus a question about why
cpu->cpu_index can now be used but kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
was previously needed.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 14 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index ff1578bb32..b8c36ba50a 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
> #endif
>
> struct KVMParkedVcpu {
> - unsigned long vcpu_id;
> + int vcpu_id;
> int kvm_fd;
> QLIST_ENTRY(KVMParkedVcpu) node;
> };
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static QemuMutex kml_slots_lock;
> #define kvm_slots_unlock() qemu_mutex_unlock(&kml_slots_lock)
>
> static void kvm_slot_init_dirty_bitmap(KVMSlot *mem);
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id);
>
> static inline void kvm_resample_fd_remove(int gsi)
> {
> @@ -320,11 +321,49 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
> + struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> + vcpu->vcpu_id = vcpu_id;
As vcpu_id is only used here why have the local variable?
Maybe that changes in later patches, in which case ignore this.
vcpu->vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
Why is kvm_arch_vcpu_id() not necessary here any more but was
before?
> + vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
See below. I'm not sure why it's safe not to use kvm_arch_vcpu_id()
Seems a few architectures have less than trivial implementations of
that function currently.
> + KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> + int kvm_fd;
> +
> + DPRINTF("kvm_create_vcpu\n");
> +
> + /* check if the KVM vCPU already exist but is parked */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_get_vcpu(s, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + /* vCPU not parked: create a new KVM vCPU */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + error_report("KVM_CREATE_VCPU IOCTL failed for vCPU %d", vcpu_id);
> + return kvm_fd;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> + cpu->kvm_fd = kvm_fd;
> + cpu->kvm_state = s;
> + cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> + cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
Trivial but I would have maintained the order wrt to the code removed
below just to avoid a reviewer having to check the two bits of code
do the same thing after the reorder.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> {
> KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> long mmap_size;
> - struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
>
> DPRINTF("kvm_destroy_vcpu\n");
> @@ -353,10 +392,7 @@ static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> - vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> - vcpu->vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
> - vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> - QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> + kvm_park_vcpu(cpu);
> err:
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -369,7 +405,7 @@ void kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> -static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id)
> {
> struct KVMParkedVcpu *cpu;
>
> @@ -384,7 +420,7 @@ static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> }
> }
>
> - return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)vcpu_id);
> + return -1;
> }
>
> int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
> @@ -395,19 +431,14 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
>
> trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
>
> - ret = kvm_get_vcpu(s, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> + ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
The switch from kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu) to using
int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
Seems like a functional change on some arch.
> if (ret < 0) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_get_vcpu failed (%lu)",
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> + "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_create_vcpu failed (%lu)",
The rewrap of the lines above seems like an unrelated change.
> kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> goto err;
> }
>
> - cpu->kvm_fd = ret;
> - cpu->kvm_state = s;
> - cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> - cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> - cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
> -
> mmap_size = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_VCPU_MMAP_SIZE, 0);
> if (mmap_size < 0) {
> ret = mmap_size;
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index ee9025f8e9..785f3ed083 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -464,6 +464,20 @@ void kvm_set_sigmask_len(KVMState *s, unsigned int sigmask_len);
>
> int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,
> hwaddr *phys_addr);
> +/**
> + * kvm_create_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU or creates a KVM vCPU
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which KVM vCPU has to be created/fetched.
Extra space before QOM (same below)
> + *
> + * @returns: 0 when success, errno (<0) when failed.
> + */
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
Blank line here perhaps.
> +/**
> + * kvm_park_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU if it exists
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which parked KVM vCPU has to be fetched.
We aren't returning anything, so why fetch?
> + *
> + * @returns: kvm_fd (>0) when success, -1 when failed.
> + */
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
>
> #endif /* NEED_CPU_H */
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
<peter.maydell@linaro.org>, <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
<imammedo@redhat.com>, <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
<david@redhat.com>, <philmd@linaro.org>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
<oliver.upton@linux.dev>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mst@redhat.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <gshan@redhat.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<alex.bennee@linaro.org>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<darren@os.amperecomputing.com>, <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>, <karl.heubaum@oracle.com>,
<miguel.luis@oracle.com>, <salil.mehta@opnsrc.net>,
<zhukeqian1@huawei.com>, <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>,
<wangyanan55@huawei.com>, <jiakernel2@gmail.com>,
<maobibo@loongson.cn>, <lixianglai@loongson.cn>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 16:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002165322.00003a2e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230930001933.2660-2-salil.mehta@huawei.com>
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 01:19:24 +0100
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> wrote:
> KVM vCPU creation is done once during the initialization of the VM when Qemu
> threads are spawned. This is common to all the architectures.
>
> Hot-unplug of vCPU results in destruction of the vCPU objects in QOM but
> the KVM vCPU objects in the Host KVM are not destroyed and their representative
> KVM vCPU objects/context in Qemu are parked.
>
> Refactor common logic so that some APIs could be reused by vCPU Hotplug code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Hi Salil,
A few trivial things inline, plus a question about why
cpu->cpu_index can now be used but kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
was previously needed.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 14 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index ff1578bb32..b8c36ba50a 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
> #endif
>
> struct KVMParkedVcpu {
> - unsigned long vcpu_id;
> + int vcpu_id;
> int kvm_fd;
> QLIST_ENTRY(KVMParkedVcpu) node;
> };
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static QemuMutex kml_slots_lock;
> #define kvm_slots_unlock() qemu_mutex_unlock(&kml_slots_lock)
>
> static void kvm_slot_init_dirty_bitmap(KVMSlot *mem);
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id);
>
> static inline void kvm_resample_fd_remove(int gsi)
> {
> @@ -320,11 +321,49 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
> + struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> + vcpu->vcpu_id = vcpu_id;
As vcpu_id is only used here why have the local variable?
Maybe that changes in later patches, in which case ignore this.
vcpu->vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
Why is kvm_arch_vcpu_id() not necessary here any more but was
before?
> + vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> +{
> + int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
See below. I'm not sure why it's safe not to use kvm_arch_vcpu_id()
Seems a few architectures have less than trivial implementations of
that function currently.
> + KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> + int kvm_fd;
> +
> + DPRINTF("kvm_create_vcpu\n");
> +
> + /* check if the KVM vCPU already exist but is parked */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_get_vcpu(s, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + /* vCPU not parked: create a new KVM vCPU */
> + kvm_fd = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, vcpu_id);
> + if (kvm_fd < 0) {
> + error_report("KVM_CREATE_VCPU IOCTL failed for vCPU %d", vcpu_id);
> + return kvm_fd;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> + cpu->kvm_fd = kvm_fd;
> + cpu->kvm_state = s;
> + cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> + cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
Trivial but I would have maintained the order wrt to the code removed
below just to avoid a reviewer having to check the two bits of code
do the same thing after the reorder.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> {
> KVMState *s = kvm_state;
> long mmap_size;
> - struct KVMParkedVcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
>
> DPRINTF("kvm_destroy_vcpu\n");
> @@ -353,10 +392,7 @@ static int do_kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> - vcpu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*vcpu));
> - vcpu->vcpu_id = kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu);
> - vcpu->kvm_fd = cpu->kvm_fd;
> - QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_state->kvm_parked_vcpus, vcpu, node);
> + kvm_park_vcpu(cpu);
> err:
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -369,7 +405,7 @@ void kvm_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> }
>
> -static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> +static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, int vcpu_id)
> {
> struct KVMParkedVcpu *cpu;
>
> @@ -384,7 +420,7 @@ static int kvm_get_vcpu(KVMState *s, unsigned long vcpu_id)
> }
> }
>
> - return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)vcpu_id);
> + return -1;
> }
>
> int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
> @@ -395,19 +431,14 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
>
> trace_kvm_init_vcpu(cpu->cpu_index, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
>
> - ret = kvm_get_vcpu(s, kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> + ret = kvm_create_vcpu(cpu);
The switch from kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu) to using
int vcpu_id = cpu->cpu_index;
Seems like a functional change on some arch.
> if (ret < 0) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_get_vcpu failed (%lu)",
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> + "kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_create_vcpu failed (%lu)",
The rewrap of the lines above seems like an unrelated change.
> kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cpu));
> goto err;
> }
>
> - cpu->kvm_fd = ret;
> - cpu->kvm_state = s;
> - cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
> - cpu->dirty_pages = 0;
> - cpu->throttle_us_per_full = 0;
> -
> mmap_size = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_VCPU_MMAP_SIZE, 0);
> if (mmap_size < 0) {
> ret = mmap_size;
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index ee9025f8e9..785f3ed083 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -464,6 +464,20 @@ void kvm_set_sigmask_len(KVMState *s, unsigned int sigmask_len);
>
> int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,
> hwaddr *phys_addr);
> +/**
> + * kvm_create_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU or creates a KVM vCPU
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which KVM vCPU has to be created/fetched.
Extra space before QOM (same below)
> + *
> + * @returns: 0 when success, errno (<0) when failed.
> + */
> +int kvm_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
Blank line here perhaps.
> +/**
> + * kvm_park_vcpu - Gets a parked KVM vCPU if it exists
> + * @cpu: QOM CPUState object for which parked KVM vCPU has to be fetched.
We aren't returning anything, so why fetch?
> + *
> + * @returns: kvm_fd (>0) when success, -1 when failed.
> + */
> +void kvm_park_vcpu(CPUState *cpu);
>
> #endif /* NEED_CPU_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-30 0:19 [PATCH V2 00/10] Add architecture agnostic code to support vCPU Hotplug Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation, parking} code Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 15:53 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-10-02 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] accel/kvm: Extract common KVM vCPU {creation,parking} code Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:05 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:05 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:51 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 12:27 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 12:27 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 23:17 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:22 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:22 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] hw/acpi: Move CPU ctrl-dev MMIO region len macro to common header file Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 15:54 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 23:19 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:24 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] hw/acpi: Add ACPI CPU hotplug init stub Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:27 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:27 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 23:25 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:28 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:28 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] hw/acpi: Init GED framework with cpu hotplug events Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:29 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:29 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 23:28 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:30 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:30 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] hw/acpi: Update CPUs AML with cpu-(ctrl)dev change Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:31 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:31 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 0:09 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:33 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:33 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with cpu scan Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-03 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 12:13 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 12:13 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 0:10 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:43 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] hw/acpi: Update ACPI GED framework to support vCPU Hotplug Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:44 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:44 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 0:11 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:45 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:45 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] physmem: Add helper function to destroy CPU AddressSpace Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-02 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:20 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 11:46 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:46 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 1:36 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:54 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:54 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-04 10:48 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-04 10:48 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] gdbstub: Add helper function to unregister GDB register space Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 3:16 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-03 11:56 ` Salil Mehta
2023-10-03 11:56 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-09-30 0:19 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] target/arm/kvm: Write CPU state back to KVM on reset Salil Mehta
2023-09-30 0:19 ` Salil Mehta via
2023-10-03 3:54 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231002165322.00003a2e@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jiakernel2@gmail.com \
--cc=karl.heubaum@oracle.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lixianglai@loongson.cn \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@opnsrc.net \
--cc=vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.