All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>, <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	<linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org>, <ngompa13@gmail.com>
Cc: <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 09:15:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e405fffae735ea6a250c58bd7ad199281f111f9a.1695750478.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>

Hi Josef,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on kdave/for-next]
[cannot apply to axboe-block/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc4 next-20231004]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Josef-Bacik/fscrypt-rename-fscrypt_info-fscrypt_inode_info/20230927-020531
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/e405fffae735ea6a250c58bd7ad199281f111f9a.1695750478.git.josef%40toxicpanda.com
patch subject: [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com/

includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c: ioctl.h is included more than once.

vim +8 fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c

     2	
     3	#include <linux/iversion.h>
     4	#include "ctree.h"
     5	#include "accessors.h"
     6	#include "btrfs_inode.h"
     7	#include "disk-io.h"
   > 8	#include "ioctl.h"
     9	#include "fs.h"
    10	#include "fscrypt.h"
  > 11	#include "ioctl.h"
    12	#include "messages.h"
    13	#include "root-tree.h"
    14	#include "transaction.h"
    15	#include "xattr.h"
    16	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 04:57:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
:::::: 

BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
In-Reply-To: <e405fffae735ea6a250c58bd7ad199281f111f9a.1695750478.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
References: <e405fffae735ea6a250c58bd7ad199281f111f9a.1695750478.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
TO: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
TO: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
TO: kernel-team@fb.com
TO: ebiggers@kernel.org
TO: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
TO: ngompa13@gmail.com
CC: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
CC: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

Hi Josef,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on kdave/for-next]
[cannot apply to axboe-block/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc4 next-20231004]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Josef-Bacik/fscrypt-rename-fscrypt_info-fscrypt_inode_info/20230927-020531
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/e405fffae735ea6a250c58bd7ad199281f111f9a.1695750478.git.josef%40toxicpanda.com
patch subject: [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names
:::::: branch date: 8 days ago
:::::: commit date: 8 days ago
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231005/202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com/

includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c: ioctl.h is included more than once.

vim +8 fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c

     2	
     3	#include <linux/iversion.h>
     4	#include "ctree.h"
     5	#include "accessors.h"
     6	#include "btrfs_inode.h"
     7	#include "disk-io.h"
   > 8	#include "ioctl.h"
     9	#include "fs.h"
    10	#include "fscrypt.h"
  > 11	#include "ioctl.h"
    12	#include "messages.h"
    13	#include "root-tree.h"
    14	#include "transaction.h"
    15	#include "xattr.h"
    16	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

       reply	other threads:[~2023-10-07  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 20:57 kernel test robot [this message]
2023-10-07  1:15 ` [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-03  6:31 kernel test robot
2023-12-04  2:24 ` Liu, Yujie
2023-09-26 18:01 [PATCH 00/35] btrfs: add fscrypt support Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 01/35] fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info => fscrypt_inode_info Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 02/35] fscrypt: add per-extent encryption support Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 03/35] fscrypt: disable all but standard v2 policies for extent encryption Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 04/35] blk-crypto: add a process bio callback Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 05/35] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 06/35] fscrypt: add documentation about extent encryption Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 07/35] btrfs: add infrastructure for safe em freeing Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 08/35] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 09/35] btrfs: disable verity " Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 10/35] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 11/35] btrfs: add inode encryption contexts Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 12/35] btrfs: add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT flag Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 13/35] btrfs: adapt readdir for encrypted and nokey names Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 14/35] btrfs: handle " Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 15/35] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 16/35] btrfs: add encryption to CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 17/35] btrfs: add get_devices hook for fscrypt Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 18/35] btrfs: turn on inlinecrypt mount option for encrypt Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 19/35] btrfs: set file extent encryption excplicitly Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 20/35] btrfs: add fscrypt_info and encryption_type to extent_map Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 21/35] btrfs: add fscrypt_info and encryption_type to ordered_extent Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 22/35] btrfs: plumb through setting the fscrypt_info for ordered extents Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 23/35] btrfs: populate the ordered_extent with the fscrypt context Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 24/35] btrfs: keep track of fscrypt info and orig_start for dio reads Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 25/35] btrfs: add an optional encryption context to the end of file extents Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 26/35] btrfs: explicitly track file extent length for replace and drop Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 27/35] btrfs: pass through fscrypt_extent_info to the file extent helpers Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 28/35] btrfs: pass the fscrypt_info through the replace extent infrastructure Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 29/35] btrfs: implement the fscrypt extent encryption hooks Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 30/35] btrfs: setup fscrypt_extent_info for new extents Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 31/35] btrfs: populate ordered_extent with the orig offset Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 32/35] btrfs: set the bio fscrypt context when applicable Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:01 ` [PATCH 33/35] btrfs: add a bio argument to btrfs_csum_one_bio Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:02 ` [PATCH 34/35] btrfs: add orig_logical to btrfs_bio Josef Bacik
2023-09-26 18:02 ` [PATCH 35/35] btrfs: implement process_bio cb for fscrypt Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202310050449.35KiNskt-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=yujie.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngompa13@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.