Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] tun: Introduce virtio-net hashing feature

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, willemb@google.com,
	gustavoars@kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	steffen.klassert@secunet.com, nogikh@google.com,
	pablo@netfilter.org, decui@microsoft.com, cai@lca.pw,
	jakub@cloudflare.com, elver@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] tun: Introduce virtio-net hashing feature
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 07:50:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231009074840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48e20be1-b658-4117-8856-89ff1df6f48f@daynix.com>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:44:20PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2023/10/09 17:13, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 12:22 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > virtio-net have two usage of hashes: one is RSS and another is hash
> > > reporting. Conventionally the hash calculation was done by the VMM.
> > > However, computing the hash after the queue was chosen defeats the
> > > purpose of RSS.
> > > 
> > > Another approach is to use eBPF steering program. This approach has
> > > another downside: it cannot report the calculated hash due to the
> > > restrictive nature of eBPF.
> > > 
> > > Introduce the code to compute hashes to the kernel in order to overcome
> > > thse challenges. An alternative solution is to extend the eBPF steering
> > > program so that it will be able to report to the userspace, but it makes
> > > little sense to allow to implement different hashing algorithms with
> > > eBPF since the hash value reported by virtio-net is strictly defined by
> > > the specification.
> > > 
> > > The hash value already stored in sk_buff is not used and computed
> > > independently since it may have been computed in a way not conformant
> > > with the specification.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> > 
> > > @@ -2116,31 +2172,49 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> > >          }
> > > 
> > >          if (vnet_hdr_sz) {
> > > -               struct virtio_net_hdr gso;
> > > +               union {
> > > +                       struct virtio_net_hdr hdr;
> > > +                       struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash v1_hash_hdr;
> > > +               } hdr;
> > > +               int ret;
> > > 
> > >                  if (iov_iter_count(iter) < vnet_hdr_sz)
> > >                          return -EINVAL;
> > > 
> > > -               if (virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb, &gso,
> > > -                                           tun_is_little_endian(tun), true,
> > > -                                           vlan_hlen)) {
> > > +               if ((READ_ONCE(tun->vnet_hash.flags) & TUN_VNET_HASH_REPORT) &&
> > > +                   vnet_hdr_sz >= sizeof(hdr.v1_hash_hdr) &&
> > > +                   skb->tun_vnet_hash) {
> > 
> > Isn't vnet_hdr_sz guaranteed to be >= hdr.v1_hash_hdr, by virtue of
> > the set hash ioctl failing otherwise?
> > 
> > Such checks should be limited to control path where possible
> 
> There is a potential race since tun->vnet_hash.flags and vnet_hdr_sz are not
> read at once.

And then it's a complete mess and you get inconsistent
behaviour with packets getting sent all over the place, right?
So maybe keep a pointer to this struct so it can be
changed atomically then. Maybe even something with rcu I donnu.

-- 
MST